IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5425-d872925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Investigation of Interaction Mechanism between Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Karst Cave Based on Seepage-Stress-Damage Coupled Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Jianye Mou

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Shicheng Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Xinfang Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Cong Xiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Haoqing Fang

    (Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi 830011, China)

Abstract

Oil/gas is mainly distributed in caves for fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs, it is therefore of significance to effectively connect caves for successful carbonate reservoir development. However, the mechanism and controlling factors that influence the connection between fractures and caves still remain unknown. To investigate how hydraulic fracture interacts with natural karst cave, a coupled seepage-stress-damage model for a vuggy carbonate reservoir is established based on statistical damage mechanics theory and finite element method. The accuracy of the proposed model is validated in comparison with experimental results. Some influencing factors, including fluid pressure in the cave, formation parameters, and construction parameters, are fully taken into account. The study results show that, when the fracture deflection degree is small, a hydraulic fracture can indirectly connect with the cave through high permeable damage units. The matrix heterogeneity that influences hydraulic fracture morphology almost does not affect the interactions between fracture and cave. The higher permeability can lead to insufficient net pressure in the fracture, which is detrimental to the connection between fracture and cave. The ability of the cave to repel fracture is proportional to the in-situ stress magnitude. The higher in-situ stress difference can cause hydraulic fracture extends along with its original path, hindering hydraulic fracture deflection. The compressive stress concentration effect around the cave weakens as the fluid pressure in the cave rises, causing the cave wall to gradually transform from a compressed to a tensioned state. The hydraulic fracture can propagate along its initial trajectory because of the high injection rate’s ability to lessen the impact of the cave. These findings achieve deep insights into interaction patterns between fracture and cave, as well as provide useful guidance for hydraulic fracturing treatment design in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Li & Jianye Mou & Shicheng Zhang & Xinfang Ma & Cong Xiao & Haoqing Fang, 2022. "Numerical Investigation of Interaction Mechanism between Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Karst Cave Based on Seepage-Stress-Damage Coupled Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5425-:d:872925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Wang & Xiao Li & Bo Zhang, 2016. "Numerical Modeling of Variable Fluid Injection-Rate Modes on Fracturing Network Evolution in Naturally Fractured Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Lianchong Li & Yingjie Xia & Bo Huang & Liaoyuan Zhang & Ming Li & Aishan Li, 2016. "The Behaviour of Fracture Growth in Sedimentary Rocks: A Numerical Study Based on Hydraulic Fracturing Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Yu Wang & Xiao Li & Ruilin Hu & Chaofeng Ma & Zhiheng Zhao & Bo Zhang, 2016. "Numerical Evaluation and Optimization of Multiple Hydraulically Fractured Parameters Using a Flow-Stress-Damage Coupled Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shikuo Chen & Chenhui Wei & Tianhong Yang & Wancheng Zhu & Honglei Liu & Pathegama Gamage Ranjith, 2018. "Three-Dimensional Numerical Investigation of Coupled Flow-Stress-Damage Failure Process in Heterogeneous Poroelastic Rocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. José Reinoso & Percy Durand & Pattabhi Ramaiah Budarapu & Marco Paggi, 2019. "Crack Patterns in Heterogenous Rocks Using a Combined Phase Field-Cohesive Interface Modeling Approach: A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Tianjiao Li & Chun’an Tang & Jonny Rutqvist & Mengsu Hu & Lianchong Li & Liaoyuan Zhang & Bo Huang, 2020. "The Influence of an Interlayer on Dual Hydraulic Fractures Propagation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Haiyang Wang & Binwei Xia & Yiyu Lu & Tao Gong & Rui Zhang, 2017. "Study on the Propagation Laws of Hydrofractures Meeting a Faulted Structure in the Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Yingjie Xia & Chuanqing Zhang & Hui Zhou & Chunsheng Zhang & Wangbing Hong, 2019. "Mechanical Anisotropy and Failure Characteristics of Columnar Jointed Rock Masses (CJRM) in Baihetan Hydropower Station: Structural Considerations Based on Digital Image Processing Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Xin Chang & Yintong Guo & Jun Zhou & Xuehang Song & Chunhe Yang, 2018. "Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Interactions between Hydraulic and Natural Fractures in Shale Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Kun Ai & Longchen Duan & Hui Gao & Guangliang Jia, 2018. "Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Optimization for Low Permeability Reservoirs Based on Unified Fracture Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Yiyu Lu & Yugang Cheng & Zhaolong Ge & Liang Cheng & Shaojie Zuo & Jianyu Zhong, 2016. "Determination of Fracture Initiation Locations during Cross-Measure Drilling for Hydraulic Fracturing of Coal Seams," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Jia Liu & Jianguo Wang & Chunfai Leung & Feng Gao, 2018. "A Multi-Parameter Optimization Model for the Evaluation of Shale Gas Recovery Enhancement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Lianchong Li & Mingyang Zhai & Liaoyuan Zhang & Zilin Zhang & Bo Huang & Aishan Li & Jiaqiang Zuo & Quansheng Zhang, 2019. "Brittleness Evaluation of Glutenite Based On Energy Balance and Damage Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Zhiheng Zhao & Xiao Li & Yu Wang & Bo Zheng & Bo Zhang, 2016. "A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Interbeds on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5425-:d:872925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.