IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4838-d853836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross Entropy Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Solving the Bi-Level Bidding Optimization Problem in Local Energy Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Dharmesh Dabhi

    (M & V Patel Department of Electrical Engineering, CSPIT, Charusat University, Changa 388421, India)

  • Kartik Pandya

    (M & V Patel Department of Electrical Engineering, CSPIT, Charusat University, Changa 388421, India)

  • Joao Soares

    (GECAD, School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Fernando Lezama

    (GECAD, School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Zita Vale

    (GECAD, School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The increased penetration of renewables in power distribution networks has motivated significant interest in local energy systems. One of the main goals of local energy markets is to promote the participation of small consumers in energy transactions. Such transactions in local energy markets can be modeled as a bi-level optimization problem in which players (e.g., consumers, prosumers, or producers) at the upper level try to maximize their profits, whereas a market mechanism at the lower level maximizes the energy transacted. However, the strategic bidding in local energy markets is a complex NP-hard problem, due to its inherently nonlinear and discontinued characteristics. Thus, this article proposes the application of a hybridized Cross Entropy Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CE-CMAES) to tackle such a complex bi-level problem. The proposed CE-CMAES uses cross entropy for global exploration of search space and covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy for local exploitation. The CE-CMAES prevents premature convergence while efficiently exploring the search space, thanks to its adaptive step-size mechanism. The performance of the algorithm is tested through simulation in a practical distribution system with renewable energy penetration. The comparative analysis shows that CE-CMAES achieves superior results concerning overall cost, mean fitness, and Ranking Index (i.e., a metric used in the competition for evaluation) compared with state-of-the-art algorithms. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Statistical test is also applied, demonstrating that CE-CMAES results are statistically different and superior from the other tested algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Dharmesh Dabhi & Kartik Pandya & Joao Soares & Fernando Lezama & Zita Vale, 2022. "Cross Entropy Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Solving the Bi-Level Bidding Optimization Problem in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4838-:d:853836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. João Soares & Tiago Pinto & Fernando Lezama & Hugo Morais, 2018. "Survey on Complex Optimization and Simulation for the New Power Systems Paradigm," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-32, August.
    2. Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2016. "On Variable Reverse Power Flow-Part II: An Electricity Market Model Considering Wind Station Size and Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2016. "On Variable Reverse Power Flow-Part I: Active-Reactive Optimal Power Flow with Reactive Power of Wind Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Xiaolin Ayón & María Ángeles Moreno & Julio Usaola, 2017. "Aggregators’ Optimal Bidding Strategy in Sequential Day-Ahead and Intraday Electricity Spot Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Sebastian Stock & Francesco Sala & Alberto Berizzi & Lutz Hofmann, 2018. "Optimal Control of Wind Farms for Coordinated TSO-DSO Reactive Power Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Xinshuo Zhang & Guangwen Ma & Weibin Huang & Shijun Chen & Shuai Zhang, 2018. "Short-Term Optimal Operation of a Wind-PV-Hydro Complementary Installation: Yalong River, Sichuan Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Sudhanshu Ranjan & Smriti Jaiswal & Abdul Latif & Dulal Chandra Das & Nidul Sinha & S. M. Suhail Hussain & Taha Selim Ustun, 2021. "Isolated and Interconnected Multi-Area Hybrid Power Systems: A Review on Control Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Alfonso Risso & Alexandre Beluco & Rita De Cássia Marques Alves, 2018. "Complementarity Roses Evaluating Spatial Complementarity in Time between Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Impact of the Complementarity between Variable Generation Resources and Load on the Flexibility of the Korean Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Mahmood Hosseini Imani & Shaghayegh Zalzar & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Retailers for Risk Reduction and Profit Increment via Distributed Generators and Demand Response Programs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Luís F. N. Lourenço & Renato M. Monaro & Maurício B. C. Salles & José R. Cardoso & Loïc Quéval, 2018. "Evaluation of the Reactive Power Support Capability and Associated Technical Costs of Photovoltaic Farms’ Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Mohagheghi, Erfan & Gabash, Aouss & Alramlawi, Mansour & Li, Pu, 2018. "Real-time optimal power flow with reactive power dispatch of wind stations using a reconciliation algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 509-523.
    9. Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2016. "On Variable Reverse Power Flow-Part II: An Electricity Market Model Considering Wind Station Size and Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Finhold, E. & Gärtner, C. & Grindel, R. & Heller, T. & Leithäuser, N. & Röger, E. & Schirra, F., 2023. "Optimizing the marketing of flexibility for a virtual battery in day-ahead and balancing markets: A rolling horizon case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    11. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Bo Wang & Yanjing Li & Fei Yang & Xiaohua Xia, 2019. "A Competitive Swarm Optimizer-Based Technoeconomic Optimization with Appliance Scheduling in Domestic PV-Battery Hybrid Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, October.
    13. Ayman Esmat & Julio Usaola & Mª Ángeles Moreno, 2018. "A Decentralized Local Flexibility Market Considering the Uncertainty of Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Biggins, F.A.V. & Travers, D. & Ejeh, J.O. & Lee, R. & Buckley, A. & Brown, S., 2023. "The economic impact of location on a solar farm co-located with energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    15. Narajewski, Michał & Ziel, Florian, 2020. "Ensemble forecasting for intraday electricity prices: Simulating trajectories," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Erfan Mohagheghi & Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2017. "A Framework for Real-Time Optimal Power Flow under Wind Energy Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Narajewski, Michał & Ziel, Florian, 2022. "Optimal bidding in hourly and quarter-hourly electricity price auctions: Trading large volumes of power with market impact and transaction costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Pedro Faria, 2019. "Distributed Energy Resources Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-3, February.
    19. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.
    20. Morteza Vahid-Ghavidel & Mohammad Sadegh Javadi & Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P.S. Catalão, 2020. "Demand Response Programs in Multi-Energy Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4838-:d:853836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.