IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4642-d847302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Study of Methyl Orange Removal Using Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Factorial Experimental Design Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abdollah Karami

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates
    Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Reem Shomal

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Rana Sabouni

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mohammad H. Al-Sayah

    (Department of Chemistry, Biology and Environmental Sciences, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ahmed Aidan

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are one of the most energy-intensive industries. Every stage of wastewater treatment consumes energy, which is the primary contributor to WWTP costs. Adsorbents and process optimization are critical for energy savings. The removal of dyes from industrial wastewater by adsorption using commercially available adsorbents is inefficient. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have outstanding properties that can improve separation performance over current commercial adsorbents, and thus, these materials represent a milestone in improving dye removal in water treatment methods. In this work, three types of metal–organic frameworks (Fe-BTC, Cu-BTC, and ZIF-8) have been investigated as prospective adsorbents for methyl orange removal from water in batch setups. The results showed that at 15 mg/L MO initial concentration and 100 mg dosage, Fe-BTC had the highest removal efficiency of 91%, followed by ZIF-8 (63%), and finally Cu-BTC (35%), which exhibited structural damage due to its instability in water. Fe-BTC maintained consistent adsorption capacity over a wide range of pH values. Furthermore, a 2 3 full factorial design analysis was implemented to evaluate the conditions for maximum MO-removal efficiency. The main effects, interaction effects, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Pareto chart were reported. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the MOF type was the most significant factor, followed by dosage and initial concentration. The analysis indicated that the type of MOF and dosage had a positive effect on the removal efficiency, while the initial concentration had a negative effect. The two-way and three-way interactions were also found to be significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdollah Karami & Reem Shomal & Rana Sabouni & Mohammad H. Al-Sayah & Ahmed Aidan, 2022. "Parametric Study of Methyl Orange Removal Using Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Factorial Experimental Design Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4642-:d:847302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4642/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4642/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wakeel, Muhammad & Chen, Bin & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2016. "Energy consumption for water use cycles in different countries: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 868-885.
    2. Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2022. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plants: The influence of the technology and aging factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Can & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Gao, Xue & Berrill, Peter, 2017. "Unexpected water impacts of energy-saving measures in the iron and steel sector: Tradeoffs or synergies?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1119-1127.
    2. Wang, Xipan & Song, Junnian & Xing, Jiahao & Duan, Haiyan & Wang, Xian'en, 2022. "System nexus consolidates coupling of regional water and energy efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Ahmad, Shakeel & Jia, Haifeng & Chen, Zhengxia & Li, Qian & Xu, Changqing, 2020. "Water-energy nexus and energy efficiency: A systematic analysis of urban water systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Molinos-Senante, María & Sala-Garrido, Ramón, 2018. "Evaluation of energy performance of drinking water treatment plants: Use of energy intensity and energy efficiency metrics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1095-1102.
    5. Rosa M. Llácer-Iglesias & P. Amparo López-Jiménez & Modesto Pérez-Sánchez, 2021. "Energy Self-Sufficiency Aiming for Sustainable Wastewater Systems: Are All Options Being Explored?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Lam, Chor-Man & Leng, Ling & Chen, Pi-Cheng & Lee, Po-Heng & Hsu, Shu-Chien, 2017. "Eco-efficiency analysis of non-potable water systems in domestic buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 293-307.
    7. Sooyeon Yi & G. Mathias Kondolf & Samuel Sandoval-Solis & Larry Dale, 2022. "Application of Machine Learning-based Energy Use Forecasting for Inter-basin Water Transfer Project," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5675-5694, November.
    8. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Driving factors of water-energy nexus in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Michela Gallo & Desara Malluta & Adriana Del Borghi & Erica Gagliano, 2024. "A Critical Review on Methodologies for the Energy Benchmarking of Wastewater Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Leandro Alves Evangelista & Gustavo Meirelles & Bruno Brentan, 2023. "Computational Model of Water Distribution Network Life Cycle Deterioration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Molinos-Senante, María & Guzmán, Catalina, 2018. "Reducing CO2 emissions from drinking water treatment plants: A shadow price approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 623-631.
    12. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Vanoli, Raffaele & Vicidomini, Maria, 2019. "Economic assessment of renewable energy systems integrating photovoltaic panels, seawater desalination and water storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Liu, Gengyuan & Hu, Junmei & Chen, Caocao & Xu, Linyu & Wang, Ning & Meng, Fanxin & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecília M.V. B. & Casazza, Marco, 2021. "LEAP-WEAP analysis of urban energy-water dynamic nexus in Beijing (China)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Juan C. González Palencia & Yuta Itoi & Mikiya Araki, 2022. "Design of a Hydrogen Production System Considering Energy Consumption, Water Consumption, CO 2 Emissions and Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Gu, Yifan & Li, Yue & Li, Xuyao & Luo, Pengzhou & Wang, Hongtao & Robinson, Zoe P. & Wang, Xin & Wu, Jiang & Li, Fengting, 2017. "The feasibility and challenges of energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1463-1475.
    16. Chen, Chen & Zhang, Xiaodong & Zhang, Huayong & Cai, Yanpeng & Wang, Shuguang, 2022. "Managing water-energy-carbon nexus in integrated regional water network planning through graph theory-based bi-level programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Lee, Uisung & Han, Jeongwoo & Elgowainy, Amgad & Wang, Michael, 2018. "Regional water consumption for hydro and thermal electricity generation in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 661-672.
    18. Francisco Esteves & José Carlos Cardoso & Sérgio Leitão & Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires, 2025. "Energy Audit in Wastewater Treatment Plant According to ISO 50001: Opportunities and Challenges for Improving Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Chen, Pi-Cheng & Alvarado, Valeria & Hsu, Shu-Chien, 2018. "Water energy nexus in city and hinterlands: Multi-regional physical input-output analysis for Hong Kong and South China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 986-997.
    20. Huang, Runyao & Shen, Ziheng & Wang, Hongtao & Xu, Jin & Ai, Zisheng & Zheng, Hongyuan & Liu, Runxi, 2021. "Evaluating the energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in the Yangtze River Delta: Perspectives on regional discrepancies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4642-:d:847302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.