IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i3p687-d489129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey and Comparison of Optimization-Based Aggregation Methods for the Determination of the Flexibility Potentials at Vertical System Interconnections

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Sarstedt

    (Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany)

  • Leonard Kluß

    (Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany)

  • Johannes Gerster

    (Department of Computing Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Tobias Meldau

    (Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany)

  • Lutz Hofmann

    (Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany)

Abstract

The aggregation of operational active and reactive power flexibilities as the feasible operation region (FOR) is a main component of a hierarchical multi-voltage-level grid control as well as the cooperation of transmission and distribution system operators at vertical system interconnections. This article presents a new optimization-based aggregation approach, based on a modified particle swarm optimization (PSO) and compares it to non-linear and linear programming. The approach is to combine the advantages of stochastic and optimization-based methods to achieve an appropriate aggregation of flexibilities while obtaining additional meta information during the iterative solution process. The general principles for sampling an FOR are introduced in a survey of aggregation methods from the literature and the adaptation of the classic optimal power flow problem. The investigations are based on simulations of the Cigré medium voltage test system and are divided into three parts. The improvement of the classic PSO algorithm regarding the determination of the FOR are presented. The most suitable of four sampling strategies from the literature is identified and selected for the comparison of the optimization methods. The analysis of the results reveals a better performance of the modified PSO in sampling the FOR compared to the other optimization methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Sarstedt & Leonard Kluß & Johannes Gerster & Tobias Meldau & Lutz Hofmann, 2021. "Survey and Comparison of Optimization-Based Aggregation Methods for the Determination of the Flexibility Potentials at Vertical System Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:687-:d:489129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parizad, Ali & Hatziadoniu, Konstadinos, 2020. "Security/stability-based Pareto optimal solution for distribution networks planning implementing NSGAII/FDMT," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Stephen Frank & Steffen Rebennack, 2016. "An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation, and examples," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1172-1197, December.
    3. David Sebastian Stock & Francesco Sala & Alberto Berizzi & Lutz Hofmann, 2018. "Optimal Control of Wind Farms for Coordinated TSO-DSO Reactive Power Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Đorđe Lazović & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Advanced Flexibility Support through DSO-Coordinated Participation of DER Aggregators in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Aguado, José A. & Paredes, Ángel, 2023. "Coordinated and decentralized trading of flexibility products in Inter-DSO Local Electricity Markets via ADMM," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    3. Georgios Papazoglou & Pandelis Biskas, 2022. "Review of Methodologies for the Assessment of Feasible Operating Regions at the TSO–DSO Interface," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Georgios Papazoglou & Pandelis Biskas, 2023. "Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sander Claeys & Marta Vanin & Frederik Geth & Geert Deconinck, 2021. "Applications of optimization models for electricity distribution networks," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    2. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Nouha Dkhili & David Salas & Julien Eynard & Stéphane Thil & Stéphane Grieu, 2021. "Innovative Application of Model-Based Predictive Control for Low-Voltage Power Distribution Grids with Significant Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Konstantinos Kotsalos & Ismael Miranda & Nuno Silva & Helder Leite, 2019. "A Horizon Optimization Control Framework for the Coordinated Operation of Multiple Distributed Energy Resources in Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Abdullah Khan & Hashim Hizam & Noor Izzri bin Abdul Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2020. "Optimal power flow using hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Diego Larrahondo & Ricardo Moreno & Harold R. Chamorro & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt, 2021. "Comparative Performance of Multi-Period ACOPF and Multi-Period DCOPF under High Integration of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    8. Ottenburger, Sadeeb Simon & Çakmak, Hüseyin Kemal & Jakob, Wilfried & Blattmann, Andreas & Trybushnyi, Dmytro & Raskob, Wolfgang & Kühnapfel, Uwe & Hagenmeyer, Veit, 2020. "A novel optimization method for urban resilient and fair power distribution preventing critical network states," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    9. Pranjal Pragya Verma & Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh & Steffen Rebennack & Derek Bunn & K. Shanti Swarup & Dipti Srinivasan, 2024. "Optimal investment by large consumers in an electricity market with generator market power," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-56, June.
    10. Zhongyang Zhao & Caisheng Wang & Masoud H. Nazari, 2024. "Revenue Analysis of Stationary and Transportable Battery Storage for Power Systems: A Market Participant Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Nouha Dkhili & Julien Eynard & Stéphane Thil & Stéphane Grieu, 2021. "Resilient Predictive Control Coupled with a Worst-Case Scenario Approach for a Distributed-Generation-Rich Power Distribution Grid," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Tianyu Cui & Francesco Caravelli & Cozmin Ududec, 2017. "Correlations and Clustering in Wholesale Electricity Markets," Papers 1710.11184, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    13. Zhao, Xian & Fan, Yu & Qiu, Qingan & Chen, Ke, 2021. "Multi-criteria mission abort policy for systems subject to two-stage degradation process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 233-245.
    14. Jérôme Buire & Frédéric Colas & Jean-Yves Dieulot & Xavier Guillaud, 2019. "Stochastic Optimization of PQ Powers at the Interface between Distribution and Transmission Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Seyed Arash Alavi & Valentin Ilea & Alireza Saffarian & Cristian Bovo & Alberto Berizzi & Seyed Ghodratollah Seifossadat, 2019. "Feasible Islanding Operation of Electric Networks with Large Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources considering Security Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Yan, Xiangbin & Qiu, Hui & Peng, Rui & Wu, Shaomin, 2020. "Optimal configuration of a power grid system with a dynamic performance sharing mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    18. Timo Lohmann & Michael R. Bussieck & Lutz Westermann & Steffen Rebennack, 2021. "High-Performance Prototyping of Decomposition Methods in GAMS," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 34-50, January.
    19. Zhang, Jingrui & Zhu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Tengpeng & Yu, Yanlin & Xue, Wendong, 2020. "Improved MOEA/D approach to many-objective day-ahead scheduling with consideration of adjustable outputs of renewable units and load reduction in active distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Raheli, Enrica & Wu, Qiuwei & Zhang, Menglin & Wen, Changyun, 2021. "Optimal coordinated operation of integrated natural gas and electric power systems: A review of modeling and solution methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:687-:d:489129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.