IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8400-d701315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Limit State of a Six-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Elbow in Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Wan Kim

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Da-Woon Yun

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Bub-Gyu Jeon

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Dae-Gi Hahm

    (Smart Structural Safety & Prognosis Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 111 Daedeok-daero, 989 beon-gil, Yusung-gu, Daejon 34057, Korea)

  • Min-Kyu Kim

    (Smart Structural Safety & Prognosis Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 111 Daedeok-daero, 989 beon-gil, Yusung-gu, Daejon 34057, Korea)

Abstract

The installation of base isolation systems in nuclear power plants can improve their safety from seismic loads. However, nuclear power plants with base isolation systems experience greater displacement as they handle seismic loads. The increase in relative displacement is caused by the installed base isolation systems, which increase the seismic risk of the interface piping system. It was found that the failure mode of the interface piping system was low-cycle fatigue failure accompanied by ratcheting, and the fittings (elbows and tees) failed due to the concentration of nonlinear behavior. Therefore, in this study, the limit state was defined as leakage, and an in-plane cyclic loading test was conducted in order to quantitatively express the failure criteria for the SCH40 6-inch carbon steel pipe elbow due to low-cycle fatigue failure. The leakage line and low-cycle fatigue curves of the SCH40 6-inch carbon steel pipe elbow were presented based on the test results. In addition, the limit state was quantitatively expressed using the damage index, based on the combination of ductility and energy dissipation. The average values of the damage index for the 6-inch pipe elbow calculated using the force−displacement (P–D) and moment−relative deformation angle (M–R) relationships were found to be 10.91 and 11.27, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Bub-Gyu Jeon & Dae-Gi Hahm & Min-Kyu Kim, 2021. "Evaluation of the Limit State of a Six-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Elbow in Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8400-:d:701315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Sung-Jin Chang & Dong-Uk Park & Bub-Gyu Jeon, 2020. "Quantitative Limit State Assessment of a 3-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Tee in a Nuclear Power Plant Using a Damage Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Yi-chong, Xu, 2013. "Accident like the Fukushima unlikely in a country with effective nuclear regulation: Literature review and proposed guidelines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 126-146.
    3. Zhiguang Zhou & Xiaorong Hu & Jenna Wong, 2018. "Special Issues in the Application of Seismic Isolation to Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lam, J. & Cheung, L. & Han, Y. & Wang, S., 2018. "China’s Response to Nuclear Safety Post-Fukushima: Genuine or Rhetoric?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1866, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Goebel, Jan & Krekel, Christian & Tiefenbach, Tim & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2013. "Natural Disaster, Policy Action, and Mental Well-Being: The Case of Fukushima," IZA Discussion Papers 7691, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Wang, Qiang & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Chen, Xi & Dong, Jie-fang & Wang, Xing-min, 2015. "The future of nuclear safety: vital role of geoscientists?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 239-243.
    4. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong & He, Gang, 2018. "Research status of nuclear power: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 90-96.
    5. Contu, Davide & Strazzera, Elisabetta, 2022. "Testing for saliency-led choice behavior in discrete choice modeling: An application in the context of preferences towards nuclear energy in Italy," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Contu, Davide & Strazzera, Elisabetta & Mourato, Susana, 2016. "Modeling individual preferences for energy sources: The case of IV generation nuclear energy in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 37-58.
    7. Xue-ting Jiang & Min Su & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Investigating the Factors Influencing the Decoupling of Transport-Related Carbon Emissions from Turnover Volume in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Liu, Dehai & Xiao, Xingzhi & Li, Hongyi & Wang, Weiguo, 2015. "Historical evolution and benefit–cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 974-984.
    9. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2015. "Global zero-carbon energy pathways using viable mixes of nuclear and renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 451-459.
    10. Rui Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decomposition and Decoupling Analysis of Life-Cycle Carbon Emission in China’s Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Jan Goebel & Christian Krekel & Tim Tiefenbach & Nicholas R. Ziebarth, 2014. "Natural Disaster, Environmental Concerns, Well-Being and Policy Action," CINCH Working Paper Series 1405, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    12. Shuyu Li & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Evaluating Energy Sustainability Using the Pressure-State-Response and Improved Matter-Element Extension Models: Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Gyeonghee An & Minkyu Kim & Jae-Wook Jung & Gilberto Mosqueda & Joaquin Fabian Marquez, 2020. "Evaluation of Clearance to Stop Requirements in A Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Tzu-Husan Lin & Der-Cherng Liaw, 2015. "Development of an intelligent disaster information-integrated platform for radiation monitoring," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1711-1725, April.
    15. Kiran Kaur & Kwan Hoong Ng & Ray Kemp & Yin Yee Ong & Zaharah Ramly & Ai Peng Koh, 2019. "Knowledge generation in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 149-169, April.
    16. Lam, Jacqueline C.K. & Cheung, Lawrence Y.L. & Han, Yang & Wang, Shanshan, 2022. "China's response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima: An interdisciplinary analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Ridoan Karim & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Mohammad Ershadul Karim & Abu Bakar Munir & Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat & Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar & Nurul Aini Bani & Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin, 2018. "Legal and Regulatory Development of Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Jan Goebel & Christian Krekel & Tim Tiefenbach & Nicolas Ziebarth, 2015. "How natural disasters can affect environmental concerns, risk aversion, and even politics: evidence from Fukushima and three European countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 1137-1180, October.
    19. Yuan, Xueliang & Wang, Xujiang & Zuo, Jian, 2013. "Renewable energy in buildings in China—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-8.
    20. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Rogers, Howard, 2014. "Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8400-:d:701315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.