IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p6994-d664248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic Optimization of Polymeric Heat Exchangers for Geothermal Direct Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Carotenuto

    (Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Francesca Ceglia

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Elisa Marrasso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Maurizio Sasso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Laura Vanoli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, 80143 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The highest economic costs of a geothermal plant are basically related to well drilling and heat exchanger maintenance cost due to the chemical aggressiveness of geothermal fluid. The possibility to reduce these costs represents an opportunity to push toward geothermal plants development. Such challenges are even more important in the sites with a low-medium temperature geothermal fluids (90–120 °C) availability, where the use of these fluids for direct thermal uses can be very advantageous. For this reason, in this study, a direct geothermal heating system for a building will be investigated by considering a plastic plate heat exchanger. The choice of a polymeric heat exchanger for this application is upheld by its lower purchase cost and its higher fouling resistance than the common metal heat exchangers, overcoming the economic issues related to conventional geothermal plant. Thus, the plastic plate heat exchanger was, firstly, geometrical and thermodynamical modeled and, after, exergoeconomic optimized. In particular, an exergoeconomic analysis was assessed on the heat exchanger system by using a MATLAB and REFPROP environment, that allows for determination of the exergoeconomic costs of the geothermal fluid extraction, the heat exchanger, and the heating production. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of main design variable (number of plates/channels) and thermodynamic variable (inlet temperature of geothermal fluid) on yearly exergoeconomic product cost. Then, the proposed methodology was applied to a case study in South of Italy, where a low-medium enthalpy geothermal potential exists. The plate-heat exchanger was used to meet the space heating requests of a single building by the exploitation of low-medium temperature geothermal fluids availability in the selected area. The results show that the inlet temperature of geothermal fluid influences the exergoeconomic cost more than the geometrical parameter. The variation of the exergoeconomic cost of heat exchanger with the inlet geothermal fluid temperature is higher than the change of the exergoeconomic costs associated to wells drilling and pumping with respect to the same variable. This is due the fact that, in the selected zone of South of Italy, it is possible to find geothermal fluid in the temperature range of 90–120 °C, at shallow depth. The product exergoeconomic cost is the lowest when the temperature is higher than 105 °C; thus, the smallest heat exchange area is required. The exergoeconomic optimization determines an optimum solution with a total product cost of 922 €/y for a temperature of geothermal fluid equal to 117 °C and with a number of plates equal to 15.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Carotenuto & Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Maurizio Sasso & Laura Vanoli, 2021. "Exergoeconomic Optimization of Polymeric Heat Exchangers for Geothermal Direct Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6994-:d:664248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/6994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/6994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. d'Accadia, M.Dentice & Sasso, M, 1998. "Exergetic cost and exergoeconomic evaluation of vapour-compression heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 937-942.
    2. Dentice d'Accadia, M. & Fichera, A. & Sasso, M. & Vidiri, M., 2002. "Determining the optimal configuration of a heat exchanger (with a two-phase refrigerant) using exergoeconomics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 191-203, March.
    3. Carlino, S. & Somma, R. & Troiano, A. & Di Giuseppe, M.G. & Troise, C. & De Natale, G., 2014. "The geothermal system of Ischia Island (southern Italy): Critical review and sustainability analysis of geothermal resource for electricity generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 177-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany & Ibrahim M. Al-Helal & Abdullah Alsadon & Abdullah Ibrahim & Mohamed Shady, 2022. "Measuring and Predicting the In-Ground Temperature Profile for Geothermal Energy Systems in the Desert of Arid Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Seppo Sierla & Heikki Ihasalo & Valeriy Vyatkin, 2022. "A Review of Reinforcement Learning Applications to Control of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Xinpeng Diao & Quanshuai Sun & Jing Yang & Kan Wu & Xin Lu, 2022. "A Novel Deformation Extraction Approach for Sub-Band InSAR and Its Application in Large-Scale Surface Mining Subsidence Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Bobo & Xu, Jiuping & Ni, Ting & Li, Meihui, 2015. "Geothermal energy utilization trends from a technological paradigm perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 430-441.
    2. Calise, Francesco & Cipollina, Andrea & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Piacentino, Antonio, 2014. "A novel renewable polygeneration system for a small Mediterranean volcanic island for the combined production of energy and water: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 675-693.
    3. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Peng, Lan & Liu, Chao, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a condenser for a binary mixture of vapors in organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 341-347.
    4. Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2009. "Advanced exergetic evaluation of refrigeration machines using different working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2248-2258.
    5. Ucar, Aynur, 2010. "Thermoeconomic analysis method for optimization of insulation thickness for the four different climatic regions of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1854-1864.
    6. Carotenuto, Alberto & Ciccolella, Michela & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro, 2016. "Models for thermo-fluid dynamic phenomena in low enthalpy geothermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 330-355.
    7. Carlino, Stefano & Troiano, Antonio & Di Giuseppe, Maria Giulia & Tramelli, Anna & Troise, Claudia & Somma, Renato & De Natale, Giuseppe, 2016. "Exploitation of geothermal energy in active volcanic areas: A numerical modelling applied to high temperature Mofete geothermal field, at Campi Flegrei caldera (Southern Italy)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 54-66.
    8. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Togun, Hussein & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2021. "Feasibility investigation of a novel geothermal-based integrated energy conversion system: Modified specific exergy costing (M-SPECO) method and optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1124-1147.
    9. Angelo Algieri, 2018. "Energy Exploitation of High-Temperature Geothermal Sources in Volcanic Areas—a Possible ORC Application in Phlegraean Fields (Southern Italy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Manjunath, K. & Kaushik, S.C., 2014. "Second law thermodynamic study of heat exchangers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 348-374.
    11. Spittler, Nathalie & Shafiei, Ehsan & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Juliusson, Egill, 2020. "Modelling geothermal resource utilization by incorporating resource dynamics, capacity expansion, and development costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Spittler, Nathalie & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Shafiei, Ehsan & Leaver, Jonathan & Asgeirsson, Eyjolfur Ingi & Stefansson, Hlynur, 2020. "The role of geothermal resources in sustainable power system planning in Iceland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1081-1090.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6994-:d:664248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.