IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6024-d640487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Protection Technology for Acoustic–Magnetic Device in a Geothermal Water Anti-Scaling System

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Korzhakov

    (Engineering Physics Faculty, Adyghe State University, 385000 Maykop, Russia)

  • Sergei Oskin

    (Faculty of Energy, Kuban State Agrarian University, 350044 Krasnodar, Russia)

Abstract

This article presents the results of the design of acoustic–magnetic device thermal protection technology based on simulation. The acoustic–magnetic device (AMD) was installed in the heat supply system of a greenhouse complex with a geothermal heat source, developed and patented by the authors of this paper. Simulation was performed to investigate the possibility of maintaining the acoustic transmitter temperature of the acoustic–magnetic device in its operating range. The QuickField Student Edition v 6.4 simulation environment was used for this purpose. Based on the results of the simulation, the optimum thermal mode of the acoustic–magnetic device was developed and implemented. The optimum temporal operating mode of the acoustic–magnetic device is necessary for the optimization of the non-reagent treatment of geothermal water in a heat supply system of a greenhouse complex. It allows for a considerable reduction in the intensity of scale formation in the heat exchanger and equipment of a geothermal heating system. As demonstrated by the simulation thermal modes, the acoustic–magnetic device provides conditions for the work maintenance of the AMD acoustic transmitter at the resonance frequency, reduces the power expenses, and increases the efficiency of the acoustic influence on the scale formed in the heat supply system of a greenhouse complex. The results of the simulation were implemented in the greenhouse complex of JSC “Raduga”. The thermal protection technology was realized by installing two acoustic–magnetic devices and automation systems in the geothermal heating system a greenhouse complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Korzhakov & Sergei Oskin, 2021. "Thermal Protection Technology for Acoustic–Magnetic Device in a Geothermal Water Anti-Scaling System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6024-:d:640487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalla Longa, Francesco & Nogueira, Larissa P. & Limberger, Jon & Wees, Jan-Diederik van & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2020. "Scenarios for geothermal energy deployment in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Carson Kinney & Alireza Dehghani-Sanij & SeyedBijan Mahbaz & Maurice B. Dusseault & Jatin S. Nathwani & Roydon A. Fraser, 2019. "Geothermal Energy for Sustainable Food Production in Canada’s Remote Northern Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Yuchao & Tang, Liansheng & Wu, Nengyou & Cao, Yifei, 2017. "Analysis of influencing factors of production performance of enhanced geothermal system: A case study at Yangbajing geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 218-235.
    2. Martina Gizzi & Federico Vagnon & Glenda Taddia & Stefano Lo Russo, 2023. "A Review of Groundwater Heat Pump Systems in the Italian Framework: Technological Potential and Environmental Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Luka Perković & Domagoj Leko & Amalia Lekić Brettschneider & Hrvoje Mikulčić & Petar S. Varbanov, 2021. "Integration of Photovoltaic Electricity with Shallow Geothermal Systems for Residential Microgrids: Proof of Concept and Techno-Economic Analysis with RES2GEO Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Mohd Alsaleh & Xiaohui Wang, 2023. "How Does Information and Communication Technology Affect Geothermal Energy Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Sayed, Enas Taha & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Alawadhi, Hussain & Elsaid, Khaled & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Olabi, A.G., 2021. "Graphitic carbon nitride/carbon brush composite as a novel anode for yeast-based microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Maria Milousi & Athanasios Pappas & Andreas P. Vouros & Giouli Mihalakakou & Manolis Souliotis & Spiros Papaefthimiou, 2022. "Evaluating the Technical and Environmental Capabilities of Geothermal Systems through Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Zeng, Yu-Chao & Su, Zheng & Wu, Neng-You, 2013. "Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 92-107.
    8. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2018. "Siting enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): Heat benefits versus induced seismicity risks from an investor and societal perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1311-1325.
    10. Dimitrova, Zlatina & Maréchal, François, 2014. "Environomic design of vehicle energy systems for optimal mobility service," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1019-1028.
    11. Xu, Da & Yuan, Zhe-Li & Bai, Ziyi & Wu, Zhibin & Chen, Shuangyin & Zhou, Ming, 2022. "Optimal operation of geothermal-solar-wind renewables for community multi-energy supplies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    12. Karayel, G. Kubilay & Javani, Nader & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2022. "Effective use of geothermal energy for hydrogen production: A comprehensive application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    13. Dimitrova, Zlatina & Lourdais, Pierre & Maréchal, François, 2015. "Performance and economic optimization of an organic rankine cycle for a gasoline hybrid pneumatic powertrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 574-588.
    14. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2013. "Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 123-132.
    15. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin, 2016. "A numerical analysis of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant for power generation from low-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 834-848.
    16. Honglei Shi & Guiling Wang & Wei Zhang & Feng Ma & Wenjing Lin & Menglei Ji, 2023. "Predicting the Potential of China’s Geothermal Energy in Industrial Development and Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Alsaleh, Mohd & Yang, Zhengyong & Chen, Tinggui & Wang, Xiaohui & Abdul-Rahim, Abdul Samad & Mahmood, Haider, 2023. "Moving toward environmental sustainability: Assessing the influence of geothermal power on carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 880-893.
    18. Menberg, Kathrin & Heberle, Florian & Bott, Christoph & Brüggemann, Dieter & Bayer, Peter, 2021. "Environmental performance of a geothermal power plant using a hydrothermal resource in the Southern German Molasse Basin," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 20-31.
    19. Chen, Ben & Liu, Qi & Zhang, Cheng & Liu, Yang & Shen, Jun & Tu, Zhengkai, 2022. "Numerical study on water transfer characteristics under joint effect of placement orientation and flow channel size for PEMFC with dead-ended anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    20. Xia, Zhenhua & Qin, Siyu & Tao, Zeyu & Jia, Guosheng & Cheng, Chonghua & Jin, Liwen, 2023. "Multi-factor optimization of thermo-economic performance of coaxial borehole heat exchanger geothermal system based on Levelized Cost of Energy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6024-:d:640487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.