IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5891-d637511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microwave Assisted Alkaline Pretreatment of Algae Waste in the Production of Cellulosic Bioethanol

Author

Listed:
  • Rocío Maceiras

    (Centro Universitario de la Defensa, Escuela Naval Militar, Plaza de España s/n, 36920 Marín, Spain)

  • Víctor Alfonsín

    (Centro Universitario de la Defensa, Escuela Naval Militar, Plaza de España s/n, 36920 Marín, Spain)

  • Luis Seguí

    (Escuela Naval Militar, Plaza de España s/n, 36920 Marín, Spain)

  • Juan F. González

    (Department of Applied Physics, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

Abstract

Biomass pretreatment has an important role in the production of cellulosic bioethanol. In this study, the effectiveness of microwave assisted alkaline pretreatment of algae waste was analysed. After pretreatment, the product was hydrolysed using sulphuric acid. The effects of microwave power, irradiating time, solid–liquid ratio and NaOH concentration were examined. Under the best conditions, the fermentable sugars were converted to cellulosic bioethanol using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae with a bioethanol yield of 1.93 ± 0.01 g/g and a fermentation efficiency of 40.4%. The reducing sugars concentration was 30% higher than that obtained from conventional hydrolysis without pretreatment. The obtained results suggest that microwave assisted alkaline pretreatment is effective in improving the production of cellulosic bioethanol of algae waste compared to that without microwave effect. Considering energy consumption, low microwave power and short microwave irradiation time are favourable for this pretreatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocío Maceiras & Víctor Alfonsín & Luis Seguí & Juan F. González, 2021. "Microwave Assisted Alkaline Pretreatment of Algae Waste in the Production of Cellulosic Bioethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5891-:d:637511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mata, Teresa M. & Martins, António A. & Caetano, Nidia. S., 2010. "Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 217-232, January.
    2. Sudhakar, K. & Mamat, R. & Samykano, M. & Azmi, W.H. & Ishak, W.F.W. & Yusaf, Talal, 2018. "An overview of marine macroalgae as bioresource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 165-179.
    3. Lior, Noam, 2008. "Energy resources and use: The present situation and possible paths to the future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 842-857.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. de Jesus, Sérgio S. & Ferreira, Gabriela F. & Moreira, Larissa S. & Filho, Rubens Maciel, 2020. "Biodiesel production from microalgae by direct transesterification using green solvents," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1283-1294.
    3. Behnam Tabatabai & Afua Adusei & Alok Kumar Shrivastava & Prashant Kumar Singh & Viji Sitther, 2020. "Nitrogen Deprivation in Fremyella diplosiphon Augments Lipid Production without Affecting Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Zheng, Bobo & Xu, Jiuping & Ni, Ting & Li, Meihui, 2015. "Geothermal energy utilization trends from a technological paradigm perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 430-441.
    5. Bumann, A.A. & Papadokonstantakis, S. & Sugiyama, H. & Fischer, U. & Hungerbühler, K., 2010. "Evaluation and analysis of a proxy indicator for the estimation of gate-to-gate energy consumption in the early process design phases: The case of organic solvent production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2407-2418.
    6. Islam, Aminul & Chan, Eng-Seng & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin & Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain & Moniruzzaman, M. & Mridha, Moniruzzaman, 2014. "Energy security in Bangladesh perspective—An assessment and implication," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 154-171.
    7. Peralta-Ruiz, Y. & González-Delgado, A.-D. & Kafarov, V., 2013. "Evaluation of alternatives for microalgae oil extraction based on exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 226-236.
    8. Behroozeh, Samira & Hayati, Dariush & Karami, Ezatollah, 2022. "Determining and validating criteria to measure energy consumption sustainability in agricultural greenhouses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Terigar, Beatrice G. & Theegala, Chandra S., 2014. "Investigating the interdependence between cell density, biomass productivity, and lipid productivity to maximize biofuel feedstock production from outdoor microalgal cultures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 238-243.
    10. Rahman, Syed Masiur & Khondaker, A.N., 2012. "Mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon capture and storage in Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2446-2460.
    11. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    12. Maity, Jyoti Prakash & Hou, Chia-Peng & Majumder, Dip & Bundschuh, Jochen & Kulp, Thomas R. & Chen, Chien-Yen & Chuang, Lu-Te & Nathan Chen, Ching-Nen & Jean, Jiin-Shuh & Yang, Tsui-Chu & Chen, Chien-, 2014. "The production of biofuel and bioelectricity associated with wastewater treatment by green algae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 94-103.
    13. Patel, Akash & Gami, Bharat & Patel, Pankaj & Patel, Beena, 2017. "Microalgae: Antiquity to era of integrated technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 535-547.
    14. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    15. Dutta, Rohan & Ghosh, Parthasarathi & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2011. "Customization and validation of a commercial process simulator for dynamic simulation of Helium liquefier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3204-3214.
    16. Kumar, Ravi Ranjan & Sarkar, Debasis & Sen, Ramkrishna, 2024. "Simultaneously maximizing microalgal biomass and lipid productivities by machine learning driven modeling, global sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization for sustainable biodiesel produc," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    17. Dębowski, Marcin & Zieliński, Marcin & Grala, Anna & Dudek, Magda, 2013. "Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 596-604.
    18. Thi Dong Phuong Nguyen & Duc Huy Nguyen & Jun Wei Lim & Chih-Kai Chang & Hui Yi Leong & Thi Ngoc Thu Tran & Thi Bich Hau Vu & Thi Trung Chinh Nguyen & Pau Loke Show, 2019. "Investigation of the Relationship between Bacteria Growth and Lipid Production Cultivating of Microalgae Chlorella Vulgaris in Seafood Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    20. Kleijn, René & van der Voet, Ester & Kramer, Gert Jan & van Oers, Lauran & van der Giesen, Coen, 2011. "Metal requirements of low-carbon power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5640-5648.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5891-:d:637511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.