IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i6p2407-2418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and analysis of a proxy indicator for the estimation of gate-to-gate energy consumption in the early process design phases: The case of organic solvent production

Author

Listed:
  • Bumann, A.A.
  • Papadokonstantakis, S.
  • Sugiyama, H.
  • Fischer, U.
  • Hungerbühler, K.

Abstract

Gate-to-gate process energy consumption is an important metric for sustainability as it affects both costs and environmental impact. As only little process information is available in early phases of chemical process design, a detailed energy consumption calculation is substantially restrained. Therefore, a reliable estimation of energy consumption in early phases of process design is an important alternative. In this work, an index representing process energy consumption was evaluated and tested for 14 organic solvent case studies. By using simplified process models the indices were calculated and compared to literature values for gate-to-gate energy consumption. The predictability of the process energy consumption on the basis of this indicator, including possible modifications in its original definition, was evaluated with the Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients. The results further validated the use of the EI (energy index) in its original form as a proxy indicator of the process energy consumption for decision making in early stages of process design. For assessing the production of new classes of chemicals the EI should be evaluated as shown in this paper in order to establish its practicability. In certain cases an adjustment of the indicator categories may be necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Bumann, A.A. & Papadokonstantakis, S. & Sugiyama, H. & Fischer, U. & Hungerbühler, K., 2010. "Evaluation and analysis of a proxy indicator for the estimation of gate-to-gate energy consumption in the early process design phases: The case of organic solvent production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2407-2418.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:6:p:2407-2418
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210000770
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lior, Noam, 2008. "Energy resources and use: The present situation and possible paths to the future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 842-857.
    2. Szargut, Jan T., 2004. "Optimization of the design parameters aiming at the minimization of the depletion of non-renewable resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2161-2169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Strijov, Vadim & Granić, Goran & Jurić, Željko & Jelavić, Branka & Antešević Maričić, Sandra, 2011. "Integral indicator of ecological impact of the Croatian thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4144-4149.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost – Szargut's proposal on exergy and ecology connection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1050-1059.
    2. Behroozeh, Samira & Hayati, Dariush & Karami, Ezatollah, 2022. "Determining and validating criteria to measure energy consumption sustainability in agricultural greenhouses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Dutta, Rohan & Ghosh, Parthasarathi & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2011. "Customization and validation of a commercial process simulator for dynamic simulation of Helium liquefier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3204-3214.
    4. Rocío Maceiras & Víctor Alfonsín & Luis Seguí & Juan F. González, 2021. "Microwave Assisted Alkaline Pretreatment of Algae Waste in the Production of Cellulosic Bioethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    6. Ridoan Karim & Mohammad Ershadul Karim & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar & Nurul Aini Bani & Abu Bakar Munir & Ahmed Imran Kabir & Jorge Alfredo Ardila-Rey & Abdullahi Abubakar Mas’ud, 2018. "Nuclear Energy Development in Bangladesh: A Study of Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Roshan, Gh.R. & Orosa, J.A & Nasrabadi, T., 2012. "Simulation of climate change impact on energy consumption in buildings, case study of Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 731-739.
    8. Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Kumar, Naveen & Pal, Shyam Sunder & Du Jun, Yong, 2011. "Experimental studies on fumigation of ethanol in a small capacity Diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1030-1038.
    9. Marc A. Rosen, 2012. "Engineering Sustainability: A Technical Approach to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    11. Paniagua, S. & Escudero, L. & Escapa, C. & Coimbra, R.N. & Otero, M. & Calvo, L.F., 2016. "Effect of waste organic amendments on Populus sp biomass production and thermal characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 166-174.
    12. Shuit, S.H. & Tan, K.T. & Lee, K.T. & Kamaruddin, A.H., 2009. "Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: A Malaysian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1225-1235.
    13. Gryboś, Dominik & Leszczyński, Jacek, 2023. "Exergy analysis of pressure reduction, back pressure and intermittent air supply configuration of utilization/expansion stage in compressed air systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Whiting, Kai & Carmona, Luis Gabriel & Sousa, Tânia, 2017. "A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 202-211.
    15. Ukidwe, Nandan U. & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2007. "Industrial and ecological cumulative exergy consumption of the United States via the 1997 input–output benchmark model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1560-1592.
    16. Johnson, Neil & Kang, Jian & Hathway, Elizabeth Abigail, 2014. "Acoustics of weirs: Potential implications for micro-hydropower noise," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 351-360.
    17. Valero, Antonio & Usón, Sergio & Torres, César & Valero, Alicia & Agudelo, Andrés & Costa, Jorge, 2013. "Thermoeconomic tools for the analysis of eco-industrial parks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-72.
    18. Khojasteh, Danial & Khojasteh, Davood & Kamali, Reza & Beyene, Asfaw & Iglesias, Gregorio, 2018. "Assessment of renewable energy resources in Iran; with a focus on wave and tidal energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2992-3005.
    19. Xu, Gang & Li, Le & Yang, Yongping & Tian, Longhu & Liu, Tong & Zhang, Kai, 2012. "A novel CO2 cryogenic liquefaction and separation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 522-529.
    20. Ziębik, Andrzej & Gładysz, Paweł, 2018. "Systems approach to energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 396-407.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:6:p:2407-2418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.