IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p4943-d613333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power Maximization and Turbulence Intensity Management through Axial Induction-Based Optimization and Efficient Static Turbine Deployment

Author

Listed:
  • Mfon Charles

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • David T. O. Oyedokun

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • Mqhele Dlodlo

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
    Vice-Chancellor’s Department, National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Corner, Gwanda Road and Cecil Avenue, Bulawayo P.O. Box AC939, Zimbabwe)

Abstract

Layout optimization is capable of increasing turbine density and reducing wake effects in wind plants. However, such optimized layouts do not guarantee fixed T-2-T distances in any direction and would be disadvantageous if reduction in computational costs due to turbine set-point updates is also a priority. Regular turbine layouts are considered basic because turbine coordinates can be determined intuitively without the application of any optimization algorithms. However, such layouts can be used to intentionally create directions of large T-2-T distances, hence, achieve the gains of standard/non-optimized operations in these directions, while also having close T-2-T distances in other directions from which the gains of optimized operations can be enjoyed. In this study, a regular hexagonal turbine layout is used to deploy turbines within a fixed area dimension, and a turbulence intensity-constrained axial induction-based plant-wide optimization is carried out using particle swarm, artificial bee colony, and differential evolution optimization techniques. Optimized plant power for three close turbine deployments (4 D , 5 D , and 6 D ) are compared to a non-optimized 7 D deployment using three mean wind inflows. Results suggest that a plant power increase of up to 37% is possible with a 4 D deployment, with this increment decreasing as deployment distance increases and as mean wind inflow increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Mfon Charles & David T. O. Oyedokun & Mqhele Dlodlo, 2021. "Power Maximization and Turbulence Intensity Management through Axial Induction-Based Optimization and Efficient Static Turbine Deployment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4943-:d:613333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4943/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4943/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chowdhury, Souma & Zhang, Jie & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2013. "Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 273-282.
    2. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Ritter & Simone Pieralli & Martin Odening, 2017. "Neighborhood Effects in Wind Farm Performance: A Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Pollini, Nicolò, 2022. "Topology optimization of wind farm layouts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1015-1027.
    5. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    6. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    7. Kuo, Jim Y.J. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2015. "A mechanistic semi-empirical wake interaction model for wind farm layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2157-2165.
    8. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    9. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    10. Souma Chowdhury & Ali Mehmani & Jie Zhang & Achille Messac, 2016. "Market Suitability and Performance Tradeoffs Offered by Commercial Wind Turbines across Differing Wind Regimes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-31, May.
    11. Zilong, Ti & Xiao Wei, Deng, 2022. "Layout optimization of offshore wind farm considering spatially inhomogeneous wave loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    12. Souaiby, Marwa & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2024. "An improved analytical framework for flow prediction inside and downstream of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Piotr Kułyk & Łukasz Augustowski, 2021. "Economic Profitability of a Hybrid Approach to Powering Residual Households from Natural Sources in Two Wind Zones of the Lubuskie Voivodeship in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Yin, Peng-Yeng & Wu, Tsai-Hung & Hsu, Ping-Yi, 2017. "Simulation based risk management for multi-objective optimal wind turbine placement using MOEA/D," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 579-597.
    15. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Rasheed, Nadia, 2016. "Wind farm layout optimization using area dimensions and definite point selection techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 154-163.
    16. Yuanhang Qi & Peng Hou & Guisong Liu & Rongsen Jin & Zhile Yang & Guangya Yang & Zhaoyang Dong, 2021. "Cable Connection Optimization for Heterogeneous Offshore Wind Farms via a Voronoi Diagram Based Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with Local Search," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Park, Jinkyoo & Law, Kincho H., 2015. "Layout optimization for maximizing wind farm power production using sequential convex programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 320-334.
    18. Han, Qinkai & Chu, Fulei, 2021. "Directional wind energy assessment of China based on nonparametric copula models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1334-1349.
    19. Dhunny, A.Z. & Allam, Z. & Lobine, D. & Lollchund, M.R., 2019. "Sustainable renewable energy planning and wind farming optimization from a biodiversity perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1282-1297.
    20. Win Naung, Shine & Nakhchi, Mahdi Erfanian & Rahmati, Mohammad, 2021. "High-fidelity CFD simulations of two wind turbines in arrays using nonlinear frequency domain solution method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 984-1005.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4943-:d:613333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.