IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i14p4179-d592111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical Indicators for the Comparison of Power Network Development in Scenario Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Dicorato

    (Politecnico di Bari—Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Via E. Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Gioacchino Tricarico

    (Politecnico di Bari—Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Via E. Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Forte

    (Politecnico di Bari—Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Via E. Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesca Marasciuolo

    (Politecnico di Bari—Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Via E. Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

The problem of electric network expansion has different implications concerning the definition of criteria for the comparison of different candidate projects. Transmission expansion planning usually involves a set of economic and technical influences on market framework and on network operation over defined scenario evolutions, or even combining generation and transmission planning, although the application to real-sized networks usually implies cost-benefit analysis. In this paper, a methodology for performance analysis of a set of network development projects is proposed, including zonal market framework and load flow analysis, in order to individuate possible candidate projects and their influence on active power losses, admissible load increase and admissible renewable generation increase. Those merit indicators are compared among candidate projects by means of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, aiming at determining the most promising solution under different weights of criteria. Moreover, the influence of network development investment cost on project selection is assessed by means of an extension of AHP. The procedure is applied to yearly operation of NREL-118 test system.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Dicorato & Gioacchino Tricarico & Giuseppe Forte & Francesca Marasciuolo, 2021. "Technical Indicators for the Comparison of Power Network Development in Scenario Evaluations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4179-:d:592111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huppmann, Daniel & Egerer, Jonas, 2015. "National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 191-203.
    2. Kemfert, Claudia & Kunz, Friedrich & Rosellón, Juan, 2016. "A welfare analysis of electricity transmission planning in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 446-452.
    3. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Jaehnert, Stefan & Wolfgang, Ove & Farahmand, Hossein & Völler, Steve & Huertas-Hernando, Daniel, 2013. "Transmission expansion planning in Northern Europe in 2030—Methodology and analyses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 125-139.
    5. Papaemmanouil, A. & Bertling Tjernberg, L. & Tuan, L.A. & Andersson, G., 2013. "Improved cost–benefit analysis for market-based transmission planning, a European perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 215-223.
    6. Ghaddar, Bissan & Jabr, Rabih A., 2019. "Power transmission network expansion planning: A semidefinite programming branch-and-bound approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 837-844.
    7. Sharan, Ishan & Balasubramanian, R., 2012. "Integrated generation and transmission expansion planning including power and fuel transportation constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 275-284.
    8. Gorenstein Dedecca, João & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2017. "Transmission expansion simulation for the European Northern Seas offshore grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 805-824.
    9. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    10. Sun, M. & Teng, F. & Konstantelos, I. & Strbac, G., 2018. "An objective-based scenario selection method for transmission network expansion planning with multivariate stochasticity in load and renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 871-885.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianfranco Chicco & Andrea Mazza & Salvatore Musumeci & Enrico Pons & Angela Russo, 2022. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Verifying the Targets—Selected Papers from the 55th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC 2020)”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Enrico Maria Carlini & Alfonso De Cesare & Corrado Gadaleta & Chiara Giordano & Michela Migliori & Giuseppe Forte, 2022. "Assessment of Renewable Acceptance by Electric Network Development Exploiting Operation Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. La Fata, Alice & Brignone, Massimo & Procopio, Renato & Bracco, Stefano & Delfino, Federico & Barilli, Riccardo & Ravasi, Martina & Zanellini, Fabio, 2022. "An efficient Energy Management System for long term planning and real time scheduling of flexible polygeneration systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1180-1201.
    4. Rahman, Jubeyer & Jacob, Roshni Anna & Zhang, Jie, 2025. "Multi-timescale power system operations for electrolytic hydrogen generation in integrated nuclear-renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunila, Kanerva & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Martin, Bénédicte & Ekroos, Ari, 2019. "A supra-national TSO to enhance offshore wind power development in the Baltic Sea? A legal and regulatory analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 775-782.
    2. Felipe Romero-Perdomo & Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo, 2023. "Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Lüth, Alexandra & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Risks, strategies, and benefits of offshore energy hubs: A literature-based survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Kułakowski, Konrad & Mazurek, Jiří & Ramík, Jaroslav & Soltys, Michael, 2019. "When is the condition of order preservation met?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 248-254.
    5. Zygmunt Korban & Maja Taraszkiewicz-Łyda, 2022. "The Impact of Time Pressure on the Results of Psychotechnical Tests Based on the Findings of Pilot Studies Conducted on a Group of Students of the Silesian University of Technology—A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Martínez-Gordón, R. & Morales-España, G. & Sijm, J. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "A review of the role of spatial resolution in energy systems modelling: Lessons learned and applicability to the North Sea region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Qu, Chunzi & Bang, Rasmus Noss, 2024. "European Grid Development Modeling and Analysis: Established Frameworks, Research Trends, and Future Opportunities," Discussion Papers 2024/11, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    8. Enrico Maria Carlini & Alfonso De Cesare & Corrado Gadaleta & Chiara Giordano & Michela Migliori & Giuseppe Forte, 2022. "Assessment of Renewable Acceptance by Electric Network Development Exploiting Operation Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    10. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    11. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Solbrekke, Ida Marie, 2018. "A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 440-459.
    12. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Grimm, Veronika & Kleinert, Thomas & Liers, Frauke & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Endogenous price zones and investment incentives in electricity markets: An application of multilevel optimization with graph partitioning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Napat Harnpornchai & Wiriyaporn Wonggattaleekam, 2021. "An Application of Neutrosophic Set to Relative Importance Assignment in AHP," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    15. repec:hur:ijaraf:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:42-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    18. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    19. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    20. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    21. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4179-:d:592111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.