IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i10p2868-d555524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effective Increase of Photovoltaic Electricity Feed-In on Congested Transmission Lines: A Case Study of The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Maaike Braat

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3564 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Customers & Markets, TenneT TSO, Utrechtseweg 310, 6812 AR Arnhem, The Netherlands)

  • Odysseas Tsafarakis

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3564 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Ioannis Lampropoulos

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3564 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Joris Besseling

    (Department of Customers & Markets, TenneT TSO, Utrechtseweg 310, 6812 AR Arnhem, The Netherlands)

  • Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3564 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In many areas in the world, the high voltage (HV) electricity grid is saturated, which makes it difficult to accommodate additional solar photovoltaic (PV) systems connection requests. In this paper, different scenarios to increase the installed PV capacity in a saturated grid are assessed on the basis of the net present value (NPV). The developed scenarios compare an increase of grid capacity, PV system azimuth variation, curtailment, and battery storage. For each scenario the net present value (NPV) is assessed using an optimization model as a function of the overbuild capacity factor, which is defined as the relative amount of PV capacity added beyond the available capacity. The scenarios are applied on a case study of the Netherlands, and the analysis shows that, by optimising curtailment, a PV system’s capacity can be increased to 120% overbuild capacity. For larger overbuild capacity investments in the electricity-grid are preferred when these costs are taken into account. However, the optimum NPV lies at 40% overbuild, thus the societal and NPV optimum are not always aligned. Furthermore, the use of a battery system as an alternative to an infrastructure upgrade was not found to be a cost-effective solution. Thus, applying curtailment could be cost-efficient to a certain extent to allow for additional PV capacity to be connected to a saturated grid. Furthermore, the inverter size compared to the installed PV capacity should be significantly reduced. For a connection request that exceeds 120% overbuild increasing network capacity should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Maaike Braat & Odysseas Tsafarakis & Ioannis Lampropoulos & Joris Besseling & Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark, 2021. "Cost-Effective Increase of Photovoltaic Electricity Feed-In on Congested Transmission Lines: A Case Study of The Netherlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2868-:d:555524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atse Louwen & Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark & André P. C. Faaij & Ruud E. I. Schropp, 2016. "Re-assessment of net energy production and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40 years of photovoltaics development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Klinge Jacobsen, Henrik & Schröder, Sascha Thorsten, 2012. "Curtailment of renewable generation: Economic optimality and incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 663-675.
    3. Conlon, Terence & Waite, Michael & Modi, Vijay, 2019. "Assessing new transmission and energy storage in achieving increasing renewable generation targets in a regional grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1085-1098.
    4. Litjens, G.B.M.A. & Worrell, E. & van Sark, W.G.J.H.M., 2018. "Economic benefits of combining self-consumption enhancement with frequency restoration reserves provision by photovoltaic-battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 172-187.
    5. Parra, David & Patel, Martin K., 2016. "Effect of tariffs on the performance and economic benefits of PV-coupled battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 175-187.
    6. Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van den Broek, Machteld & van der Hoofd, Erik & Hommes, Klaas & van Sark, Wilfried, 2018. "A system perspective to the deployment of flexibility through aggregator companies in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 534-551.
    7. Schram, Wouter L. & Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 69-81.
    8. van der Stelt, Sander & AlSkaif, Tarek & van Sark, Wilfried, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of household and community energy storage for residential prosumers with smart appliances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 266-276.
    9. Graham Palmer & Joshua Floyd, 2017. "An Exploration of Divergence in EPBT and EROI for Solar Photovoltaics," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Laura N. Haar and Lawrence Haar, 2017. "An Option Analysis of the European Union Renewable Energy Support Mechanisms," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    11. Deetjen, Thomas A. & Garrison, Jared B. & Rhodes, Joshua D. & Webber, Michael E., 2016. "Solar PV integration cost variation due to array orientation and geographic location in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 607-616.
    12. Rajitha Udawalpola & Taisuke Masuta & Taisei Yoshioka & Kohei Takahashi & Hideaki Ohtake, 2021. "Reduction of Power Imbalances Using Battery Energy Storage System in a Bulk Power System with Extremely Large Photovoltaics Interactions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Liu, Luyao & Zhao, Yi & Chang, Dongliang & Xie, Jiyang & Ma, Zhanyu & Sun, Qie & Yin, Hongyi & Wennersten, Ronald, 2018. "Prediction of short-term PV power output and uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 700-711.
    14. Aadil Latif & Wolfgang Gawlik & Peter Palensky, 2016. "Quantification and Mitigation of Unfairness in Active Power Curtailment of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems Using Sensitivity Based Coordinated Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dariusz Kurz & Agata Nowak, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of the Level of Self-Consumption of Electricity from a Prosumer Photovoltaic Installation on Its Profitability under Different Energy Billing Scenarios in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-40, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberts, Mike B. & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2019. "Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 78-95.
    2. Litjens, G.B.M.A. & Worrell, E. & van Sark, W.G.J.H.M., 2018. "Economic benefits of combining self-consumption enhancement with frequency restoration reserves provision by photovoltaic-battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 172-187.
    3. Parra, David & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "The nature of combining energy storage applications for residential battery technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1343-1355.
    4. Kang, Hyuna & Jung, Seunghoon & Kim, Hakpyeong & Jeoung, Jaewon & Hong, Taehoon, 2024. "Reinforcement learning-based optimal scheduling model of battery energy storage system at the building level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    5. Carlos de Castro & Iñigo Capellán-Pérez, 2020. "Standard, Point of Use, and Extended Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) from Comprehensive Material Requirements of Present Global Wind, Solar, and Hydro Power Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-43, June.
    6. Azuatalam, Donald & Paridari, Kaveh & Ma, Yiju & Förstl, Markus & Chapman, Archie C. & Verbič, Gregor, 2019. "Energy management of small-scale PV-battery systems: A systematic review considering practical implementation, computational requirements, quality of input data and battery degradation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 555-570.
    7. Juha Koskela & Antti Mutanen & Pertti Järventausta, 2020. "Using Load Forecasting to Control Domestic Battery Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Aljoša Slameršak & Giorgos Kallis & Daniel W. O’Neill, 2022. "Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Grid-connected photovoltaic battery systems: A comprehensive review and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    10. Lucas Deotti & Wanessa Guedes & Bruno Dias & Tiago Soares, 2020. "Technical and Economic Analysis of Battery Storage for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the Brazilian Regulatory Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios & Benekos, Georgios & Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos & Karellas, Sotirios & Grammelis, Panagiotis & Kakaras, Emmanouel, 2018. "A review of key environmental and energy performance indicators for the case of renewable energy systems when integrated with storage solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 380-398.
    12. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "Feasibility of a 100% Global Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Marion R. Dam & Marten D. van der Laan, 2024. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Battery Systems for PV-Equipped Households with Dynamic Contracts: A Case Study of The Netherlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Aniello, Gianmarco & Bertsch, Valentin, 2023. "Shaping the energy transition in the residential sector: Regulatory incentives for aligning household and system perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    15. Muñoz-Rodríguez, Francisco José & Jiménez-Castillo, Gabino & de la Casa Hernández, Jesús & Aguilar Peña, Juan Domingo, 2021. "A new tool to analysing photovoltaic self-consumption systems with batteries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1327-1343.
    16. Fabian Rücker & Michael Merten & Jingyu Gong & Roberto Villafáfila-Robles & Ilka Schoeneberger & Dirk Uwe Sauer, 2020. "Evaluation of the Effects of Smart Charging Strategies and Frequency Restoration Reserves Market Participation of an Electric Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Soheil Mohseni & Jay Rutovitz & Heather Smith & Scott Dwyer & Farzan Tahir, 2023. "Economic Viability Assessment of Neighbourhood versus Residential Batteries: Insights from an Australian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.
    19. Okur, Özge & Heijnen, Petra & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Aggregator’s business models in residential and service sectors: A review of operational and financial aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Schram, Wouter L. & Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 69-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2868-:d:555524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.