IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i10p2860-d555452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical, Economic, Social and Regulatory Feasibility Evaluation of Dynamic Distribution Tariff Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Kristoffer Christensen

    (Center for Energy Informatics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Zheng Ma

    (Center for Health Informatics and Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen

    (Center for Energy Informatics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

The increasing number of distributed energy resources in the distribution grids creates the risk of grid congestion and the high cost of grid expansion. The implementation of the dynamic distribution grid tariffs can potentially avoid grid congestion. Meanwhile, the design and implementation of any distribution tariff need to consider and match the regional/national requirements. However, there is no sufficient evaluation method available to review and evaluate the feasibility of the dynamic distribution tariffs. Therefore, this paper introduces a feasibility evaluation method with four dimensions of technical, economic, social, and regulatory to review dynamic distribution tariffs. The literature on dynamic distribution tariffs is collected, and 29 dynamic distribution tariffs are selected and further categorized into five attributes of rationale, cost drivers, dynamics, events, and active demand. The evaluation results show that the time-of-use tariff is the most feasible dynamic distribution tariff, and the review of a proposed future distribution tariff model in Denmark verifies the evaluation method and results. The developed feasibility evaluation method for dynamic distribution tariffs can ensure the design and implementation of a dynamic distribution tariff to be feasible and applicable in a region.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristoffer Christensen & Zheng Ma & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, 2021. "Technical, Economic, Social and Regulatory Feasibility Evaluation of Dynamic Distribution Tariff Designs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2860-:d:555452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Athila Quaresma Santos & Zheng Ma & Casper Gellert Olsen & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, 2018. "Framework for Microgrid Design Using Social, Economic, and Technical Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Zheng Ma & Mette Jessen Schultz & Kristoffer Christensen & Magnus Værbak & Yves Demazeau & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, 2019. "The Application of Ontologies in Multi-Agent Systems in the Energy Sector: A Scoping Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Mlecnik, Erwin & Parker, James & Ma, Zheng & Corchero, Cristina & Knotzer, Armin & Pernetti, Roberta, 2020. "Policy challenges for the development of energy flexibility services," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simeone, Christina E. & Gagnon, Pieter & Cappers, Peter & Satchwell, Andrew, 2023. "The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilaria Vigna & Jessica Balest & Wilmer Pasut & Roberta Pernetti, 2020. "Office Occupants’ Perspective Dealing with Energy Flexibility: A Large-Scale Survey in the Province of Bolzano," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Alexander Fishov & Anatoly Osintsev & Anvari Ghulomzoda & Andrey Marchenko & Sergey Kokin & Murodbek Safaraliev & Stepan Dmitriev & Inga Zicmane, 2023. "Decentralized Emergency Control of AC Power Grid Modes with Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Cundeva, Snezana & Georghiou, George E., 2021. "Social arrangements, technical designs and impacts of energy communities: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1138-1156.
    4. Mainali, Brijesh & Mahapatra, Krushna & Pardalis, Georgios, 2021. "Strategies for deep renovation market of detached houses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Hak-Ju Lee & Ba Hau Vu & Rehman Zafar & Sung-Wook Hwang & Il-Yop Chung, 2021. "Design Framework of a Stand-Alone Microgrid Considering Power System Performance and Economic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Eunji Kim & Yoonhee Ha, 2021. "Vitalization Strategies for the Building Energy Management System (BEMS) Industry Ecosystem Based on AHP Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Naimeh Mohammadi & Hamid Mostofi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2023. "Policy Chain of Energy Transition from Economic and Innovative Perspectives: Conceptual Framework and Consistency Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Edward Smith & Duane Robinson & Ashish Agalgaonkar, 2021. "Cooperative Control of Microgrids: A Review of Theoretical Frameworks, Applications and Recent Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-34, December.
    9. Monaco, Roberto & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Leiva Vilaplana, Jose Angel & Ackom, Emmanuel & Nielsen, Per Sieverts, 2024. "Digitalization of power distribution grids: Barrier analysis, ranking and policy recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Duan, Hongbo & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "A systematic review of electricity market liberalisation and its alignment with industrial consumer participation: A comparison between the Nordics and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Adina Cretan & Cristina Nica & Carlos Coutinho & Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves & Ben Bratu, 2021. "An Intelligent System to Ensure Interoperability for the Dairy Farm Business Model," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Heinrich, Carsten & Ziras, Charalampos & Jensen, Tue V. & Bindner, Henrik W. & Kazempour, Jalal, 2021. "A local flexibility market mechanism with capacity limitation services," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Sæle, Hanne & Sperstad, Iver Bakken & Wang Hoiem, Kristian & Mathiesen, Vivi, 2023. "Understanding barriers to utilising flexibility in operation and planning of the electricity distribution system – Classification frameworks with applications to Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    16. Yin, Linfei & Qiu, Yao, 2022. "Long-term price guidance mechanism of flexible energy service providers based on stochastic differential methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    17. Kotarela, F. & Kyritsis, A. & Papanikolaou, N. & Kalogirou, S.A., 2021. "Enhanced nZEB concept incorporating a sustainable Grid Support Scheme," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 714-725.
    18. Josh Eichman & Marc Torrecillas Castelló & Cristina Corchero, 2022. "Reviewing and Exploring the Qualitative Impacts That Different Market and Regulatory Measures Can Have on Encouraging Energy Communities Based on Their Organizational Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Morteza Zare Oskouei & Ayşe Aybike Şeker & Süleyman Tunçel & Emin Demirbaş & Tuba Gözel & Mehmet Hakan Hocaoğlu & Mehdi Abapour & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo, 2022. "A Critical Review on the Impacts of Energy Storage Systems and Demand-Side Management Strategies in the Economic Operation of Renewable-Based Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, February.
    20. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2860-:d:555452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.