IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i8p2039-d347657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of Electricity Theft Behavior Based on Improved Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and Random Forest Classifier

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengwei Qu

    (Key Laboratory of Power Electronics for Energy Conservation and Drive Control, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Hongwen Li

    (Key Laboratory of Power Electronics for Energy Conservation and Drive Control, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Yunjing Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Power Electronics for Energy Conservation and Drive Control, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Jiaxi Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Power Electronics for Energy Conservation and Drive Control, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Ahmed Abu-Siada

    (School of Electrical Engineering Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth WA 6102, Australia)

  • Yunxiao Yao

    (State Grid Hubei DC Operation and Maintenance Company, Yichang 443008, China)

Abstract

Effective detection of electricity theft is essential to maintain power system reliability. With the development of smart grids, traditional electricity theft detection technologies have become ineffective to deal with the increasingly complex data on the users’ side. To improve the auditing efficiency of grid enterprises, a new electricity theft detection method based on improved synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and improve random forest (RF) method is proposed in this paper. The data of normal and electricity theft users were classified as positive data (PD) and negative data (ND), respectively. In practice, the number of ND was far less than PD, which made the dataset composed of these two types of data become unbalanced. An improved SOMTE based on K-means clustering algorithm (K-SMOTE) was firstly presented to balance the dataset. The cluster center of ND was determined by K-means method. Then, the ND were interpolated by SMOTE on the basis of the cluster center to balance the entire data. Finally, the RF classifier was trained with the balanced dataset, and the optimal number of decision trees in RF was decided according to the convergence of out-of-bag data error (OOB error). Electricity theft behaviors on the user side were detected by the trained RF classifier.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengwei Qu & Hongwen Li & Yunjing Wang & Jiaxi Zhang & Ahmed Abu-Siada & Yunxiao Yao, 2020. "Detection of Electricity Theft Behavior Based on Improved Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and Random Forest Classifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:2039-:d:347657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernat Coma-Puig & Josep Carmona, 2019. "Bridging the Gap between Energy Consumption and Distribution through Non-Technical Loss Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Xiaoquan Lu & Yu Zhou & Zhongdong Wang & Yongxian Yi & Longji Feng & Fei Wang, 2019. "Knowledge Embedded Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Detecting Non-Technical Losses in the Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Smith, Thomas B., 2004. "Electricity theft: a comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(18), pages 2067-2076, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gokturk Poyrazoglu, 2021. "Determination of Price Zones during Transition from Uniform to Zonal Electricity Market: A Case Study for Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Andreas Reinhardt & Lucas Pereira, 2021. "Special Issue: “Energy Data Analytics for Smart Meter Data”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-3, August.
    3. Pamir & Nadeem Javaid & Saher Javaid & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Umar Javed & Adamu Sani Yahaya & Sheraz Aslam, 2022. "Synthetic Theft Attacks and Long Short Term Memory-Based Preprocessing for Electricity Theft Detection Using Gated Recurrent Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Xuesong Tian & Yuping Zou & Xin Wang & Minglang Tseng & Hua Li & Huijuan Zhang, 2022. "Improving the Efficiency and Sustainability of Intelligent Electricity Inspection: IMFO-ELM Algorithm for Load Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Benish Kabir & Umar Qasim & Nadeem Javaid & Abdulaziz Aldegheishem & Nabil Alrajeh & Emad A. Mohammed, 2022. "Detecting Nontechnical Losses in Smart Meters Using a MLP-GRU Deep Model and Augmenting Data via Theft Attacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savian, Fernando de Souza & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Garlet, Taís Bisognin & do Nascimento, Felipe Moraes & Pinheiro, José Renes & Vale, Zita, 2021. "Non-technical losses: A systematic contemporary article review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Md. Nazmul Hasan & Rafia Nishat Toma & Abdullah-Al Nahid & M M Manjurul Islam & Jong-Myon Kim, 2019. "Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grid Systems: A CNN-LSTM Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Hugo Brise o & Omar Rojas, 2020. "Factors Associated with Electricity Losses: A Panel Data Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 281-286.
    4. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Daví-Arderius, Daniel & Sanin, María-Eugenia & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2017. "CO2 content of electricity losses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 439-445.
    6. Netzah Calamaro & Yuval Beck & Ran Ben Melech & Doron Shmilovitz, 2021. "An Energy-Fraud Detection-System Capable of Distinguishing Frauds from Other Energy Flow Anomalies in an Urban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-38, September.
    7. Min, Brian & Golden, Miriam, 2014. "Electoral cycles in electricity losses in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 619-625.
    8. Rains, Emily & Abraham, Ronald J., 2018. "Rethinking barriers to electrification: Does government collection failure stunt public service provision?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 288-300.
    9. Ejaz Gul & Imran Sharif Chaudhry, 2016. "Socio-Economic Analysis of Household Energy Security: Evidence from 3D Energy Losses Surface Maps (ELSMs)of a Town Using Conjuncture of Factors Matrix, Digital and Mathematical Analysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 1019-1041.
    10. Jamasb, Tooraj, 2006. "Between the state and market: Electricity sector reform in developing countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 14-30, March.
    11. Jamil, Faisal & Ahmad, Eatzaz, 2019. "Policy considerations for limiting electricity theft in the developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 452-458.
    12. Muller, Renan Bergonsi & Rego, Erik Eduardo, 2021. "Privatization of electricity distribution in Brazil: Long-term effects on service quality and financial indicators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Jamasb,Tooraj & Nepal,Rabindra & Timilsina,Govinda R., 2015. "A quarter century effort yet to come of age : a survey of power sector reforms in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7330, The World Bank.
    14. Jamil, Faisal, 2013. "On the electricity shortage, price and electricity theft nexus," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 267-272.
    15. Daniel Leite & José Pessanha & Paulo Simões & Rodrigo Calili & Reinaldo Souza, 2020. "A Stochastic Frontier Model for Definition of Non-Technical Loss Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Singh, Anoop & Jamasb, Tooraj & Nepal, Rabindra & Toman, Michael, 2018. "Electricity cooperation in South Asia: Barriers to cross-border trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 741-748.
    17. Martin Besfamille & Nicolás Figueroa & Léon Guzmán, 2023. "Ramsey Pricing Revisited: Natural Monopoly Regulation with Evaders," CESifo Working Paper Series 10732, CESifo.
    18. Mahmud I Imam & Tooraj Jamasb & Manuel Llorca, 2019. "Political Economy of Reform and Regulation in the Electricity Sector of Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers EPRG1917, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    19. Faisal Jamil & Eatzaz Ahmad, 2014. "An Empirical Study of Electricity Theft from Electricity Distribution Companies in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 239-254.
    20. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda R. Timilsina, 2017. "A Quarter Century Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:2039-:d:347657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.