IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6523-d459920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Upholding Safety in Future Energy Systems: The Need for Systemic Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Riemersma

    (Department of Values of Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Rolf Künneke

    (Department of Values of Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Genserik Reniers

    (Department of Values of Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Aad Correljé

    (Department of Values of Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper argues that energy systems are becoming increasingly complex, and illustrates how new types of hazards emerge from an ongoing transition towards renewable energy sources. It shows that the energy sector relies heavily on risk assessment methods that are analytic, and that systemic methods provide important additional insights. A case study of the Dutch gas sector illustrates this by comparing the hazard and operability study (HAZOP, analytic) with the system-theoretic process analysis (STPA, systemic). The contribution is twofold. This paper illustrates how system hazards will remain underestimated by sustained use of only analytic methods, and it highlights the need to study the organization of safety in energy transitions. We conclude that appropriate risk assessment for future energy systems involves both analytic and systemic risk assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Riemersma & Rolf Künneke & Genserik Reniers & Aad Correljé, 2020. "Upholding Safety in Future Energy Systems: The Need for Systemic Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6523-:d:459920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Scholten & Rolf Künneke, 2016. "Towards the Comprehensive Design of Energy Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Provan, David J. & Woods, David D. & Dekker, Sidney W.A. & Rae, Andrew J., 2020. "Safety II professionals: How resilience engineering can transform safety practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Read, G.J.M. & Naweed, A. & Salmon, P.M., 2019. "Complexity on the rails: A systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 352-365.
    4. Anastasios Plioutsias & Nektarios Karanikas & Maria Mikela Chatzimihailidou, 2018. "Hazard Analysis and Safety Requirements for Small Drone Operations: To What Extent Do Popular Drones Embed Safety?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 562-584, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Sung-Min & Lee, Sang Hun & Shin, Seung Ki, 2022. "A novel approach for quantitative importance analysis of safety DI&C systems in the nuclear field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Leonid Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov, 2017. "Electrification as a Development Driver for “Smart Citiesâ€," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1199-1210.
    3. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Khastgir, Siddartha & Brewerton, Simon & Thomas, John & Jennings, Paul, 2021. "Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Dindar, Serdar & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat & An, Min, 2022. "A hierarchical Bayesian-based model for hazard analysis of climate effect on failures of railway turnout components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    6. Michiel A. Heldeweg, 2017. "Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-34, July.
    7. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Thomas Hoppe & Anna Butenko & Michiel Heldeweg, 2018. "Innovation in the European Energy Sector and Regulatory Responses to It: Guest Editorial Note," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Chelouati, Mohammed & Boussif, Abderraouf & Beugin, Julie & El Koursi, El-Miloudi, 2023. "Graphical safety assurance case using Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) — challenges, opportunities and a framework for autonomous trains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Love, Peter E.D. & Matthews, Jane, 2020. "Quality, requisite imagination and resilience: Managing risk and uncertainty in construction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Hadi Alizadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2020. "Assessing Resilience of Urban Critical Infrastructure Networks: A Case Study of Ahvaz, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Sonal, & Ghosh, Debomita, 2022. "Impact of situational awareness attributes for resilience assessment of active distribution networks using hybrid dynamic Bayesian multi criteria decision-making approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Mitchell Caroline & Van Laar Darren & Strevens Caroline & Labib Ashraf, 2023. "No Harm in Learning – A Balanced High Reliability Organisation (HRO) Approach in Healthcare," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Ellen Taylor & Sue Hignett, 2021. "DEEP SCOPE: A Framework for Safe Healthcare Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Mottahedi, Adel & Sereshki, Farhang & Ataei, Mohammad & Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri & Barabadi, Abbas, 2021. "Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Ozawa, Kazumasa, 2021. "Characteristics of enhanced safety coordination between high-speed rail operators and manufacturers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Federica De Leo & Valerio Elia & Maria Grazia Gnoni & Fabiana Tornese, 2023. "Integrating Safety-I and Safety-II Approaches in Near Miss Management: A Critical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Leonid Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov, 2018. "Paradigm of Managerial Education for a Technological Breakthrough in the Economy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 433-449.
    19. Foster, Craig J. & Plant, Katherine L. & Stanton, Neville A., 2021. "A very temporary operating instruction: Uncovering emergence and adaptation in air traffic control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Dastan, Seyit Ali, 2023. "The predicaments of the Turkish natural gas market between supply shortages and price hikes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6523-:d:459920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.