IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i22p5882-d443189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Two-Step Energy Management Method Guided by Day-Ahead Quantile Solar Forecasts: Cross-Impacts on Four Services for Smart-Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Fausto Calderon-Obaldia

    (Power Systems Department, Electrical Engineering School, Engineering Faculty, Campus Rodrigo Facio, University of Costa Rica, 11501-2060 San José, Costa Rica
    LMD/IPSL, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, ENS, PSL Université, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 91120 Palaiseau, France
    GeePs-Laboratoire de Génie Électrique et Électronique de Paris, CNRS, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Campus Plateau de Moulon, 91120 Palaiseau, France
    LIMSI-Laboratoire d’Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l’Ingénieur, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay UFR des Sciences, Campus Plateau, 91405 Orsay, France)

  • Jordi Badosa

    (LMD/IPSL, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, ENS, PSL Université, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 91120 Palaiseau, France)

  • Anne Migan-Dubois

    (GeePs-Laboratoire de Génie Électrique et Électronique de Paris, CNRS, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Campus Plateau de Moulon, 91120 Palaiseau, France)

  • Vincent Bourdin

    (LIMSI-Laboratoire d’Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l’Ingénieur, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay UFR des Sciences, Campus Plateau, 91405 Orsay, France)

Abstract

The research work hereby presented, emerges from the urge to answer the well-known question of how the uncertainty of intermittent renewable sources affects the performance of a microgrid and how could we deal with it. More specifically, we want to evaluate what could be the impact in performance of a microgrid that is intended to serve a smart-building (powered by photovoltaic panels and with battery energy storage), when the uncertainty of the photovoltaic-production forecasts is considered in the energy management process through the use of quantile forecasts. For this, several objectives (or services) are targeted based in a two-step (double-objective) energy management framework, which combines optimization-based and rule-based algorithms. The performance is evaluated based on some particular services, namely: energy cost, carbon footprint, grid peak power, and grid commitment; with the latter being a novel service proposed in the domain of microgrids. Simulations are performed whlie using data of a study-case microgrid (Drahi-Xnovation center, Ecole Polytechnique, France). The use of quantile forecasts (obtained with an analog-ensemble method) is tested as a mean to deal with (i.e., decrease) the uncertainty of the solar PV production. The proposed energy management framework is compared with basic reference strategies and the results show the superior performance of the former in almost all of the proposed services and forecasting scenarios. The fact of how optimizing for some services during the scheduling (i.e., grid commitment) can be highly detrimental for the performance of the non-targeted services, is an interesting finding of this work. The differences regarding the optimal forecasting eccentricity (i.e., the forecasting quantile) required when optimizing for the different services and seasons of the year is also considered an important conclusion of the study. This fact highlights the usefulness of the quantile forecasting approach in an energy management system, as a tool to deal with the intrinsic uncertainty of PV power production.

Suggested Citation

  • Fausto Calderon-Obaldia & Jordi Badosa & Anne Migan-Dubois & Vincent Bourdin, 2020. "A Two-Step Energy Management Method Guided by Day-Ahead Quantile Solar Forecasts: Cross-Impacts on Four Services for Smart-Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:5882-:d:443189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad Khan, Aftab & Naeem, Muhammad & Iqbal, Muhammad & Qaisar, Saad & Anpalagan, Alagan, 2016. "A compendium of optimization objectives, constraints, tools and algorithms for energy management in microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1664-1683.
    2. Reynolds, Jonathan & Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem & Rezgui, Yacine & Hippolyte, Jean-Laurent, 2019. "Operational supply and demand optimisation of a multi-vector district energy system using artificial neural networks and a genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 699-713.
    3. Agüera-Pérez, Agustín & Palomares-Salas, José Carlos & González de la Rosa, Juan José & Florencias-Oliveros, Olivia, 2018. "Weather forecasts for microgrid energy management: Review, discussion and recommendations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 265-278.
    4. Mazzola, Simone & Vergara, Claudio & Astolfi, Marco & Li, Vivian & Perez-Arriaga, Ignacio & Macchi, Ennio, 2017. "Assessing the value of forecast-based dispatch in the operation of off-grid rural microgrids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 116-125.
    5. Hvelplund, Frede, 2006. "Renewable energy and the need for local energy markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2293-2302.
    6. Alessandrini, S. & Delle Monache, L. & Sperati, S. & Cervone, G., 2015. "An analog ensemble for short-term probabilistic solar power forecast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 95-110.
    7. Brida V. Mbuwir & Frederik Ruelens & Fred Spiessens & Geert Deconinck, 2017. "Battery Energy Management in a Microgrid Using Batch Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Ferruzzi, Gabriella & Cervone, Guido & Delle Monache, Luca & Graditi, Giorgio & Jacobone, Francesca, 2016. "Optimal bidding in a Day-Ahead energy market for Micro Grid under uncertainty in renewable energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 194-202.
    9. Kuznetsova, Elizaveta & Li, Yan-Fu & Ruiz, Carlos & Zio, Enrico & Ault, Graham & Bell, Keith, 2013. "Reinforcement learning for microgrid energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 133-146.
    10. Zia, Muhammad Fahad & Elbouchikhi, Elhoussin & Benbouzid, Mohamed, 2018. "Microgrids energy management systems: A critical review on methods, solutions, and prospects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 1033-1055.
    11. Zhongwen Li & Chuanzhi Zang & Peng Zeng & Haibin Yu, 2016. "Combined Two-Stage Stochastic Programming and Receding Horizon Control Strategy for Microgrid Energy Management Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Jordi de la Hoz, 2022. "Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lilia Tightiz & Joon Yoo, 2022. "A Review on a Data-Driven Microgrid Management System Integrating an Active Distribution Network: Challenges, Issues, and New Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Thomas Schmitt & Tobias Rodemann & Jürgen Adamy, 2021. "The Cost of Photovoltaic Forecasting Errors in Microgrid Control with Peak Pricing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Chen, Pengzhan & Liu, Mengchao & Chen, Chuanxi & Shang, Xin, 2019. "A battery management strategy in microgrid for personalized customer requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Ana Cabrera-Tobar & Alessandro Massi Pavan & Giovanni Petrone & Giovanni Spagnuolo, 2022. "A Review of the Optimization and Control Techniques in the Presence of Uncertainties for the Energy Management of Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Grace Muriithi & Sunetra Chowdhury, 2021. "Optimal Energy Management of a Grid-Tied Solar PV-Battery Microgrid: A Reinforcement Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Fontenot, Hannah & Dong, Bing, 2019. "Modeling and control of building-integrated microgrids for optimal energy management – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Moretti, L. & Polimeni, S. & Meraldi, L. & Raboni, P. & Leva, S. & Manzolini, G., 2019. "Assessing the impact of a two-layer predictive dispatch algorithm on design and operation of off-grid hybrid microgrids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1439-1453.
    8. Polimeni, Simone & Moretti, Luca & Martelli, Emanuele & Leva, Sonia & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2023. "A novel stochastic model for flexible unit commitment of off-grid microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    9. Poolla, Chaitanya & Ishihara, Abraham K. & Milito, Rodolfo, 2019. "Designing near-optimal policies for energy management in a stochastic environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1725-1737.
    10. Polleux, Louis & Guerassimoff, Gilles & Marmorat, Jean-Paul & Sandoval-Moreno, John & Schuhler, Thierry, 2022. "An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Zhenya Ji & Xueliang Huang & Changfu Xu & Houtao Sun, 2016. "Accelerated Model Predictive Control for Electric Vehicle Integrated Microgrid Energy Management: A Hybrid Robust and Stochastic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Clarke, Will Challis & Brear, Michael John & Manzie, Chris, 2020. "Control of an isolated microgrid using hierarchical economic model predictive control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    13. Andrea Micangeli & Davide Fioriti & Paolo Cherubini & Pablo Duenas-Martinez, 2020. "Optimal Design of Isolated Mini-Grids with Deterministic Methods: Matching Predictive Operating Strategies with Low Computational Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Manzano, J.M. & Salvador, J.R. & Romaine, J.B. & Alvarado-Barrios, L., 2022. "Economic predictive control for isolated microgrids based on real world demand/renewable energy data and forecast errors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 647-658.
    15. Zhu, Ziqing & Hu, Ze & Chan, Ka Wing & Bu, Siqi & Zhou, Bin & Xia, Shiwei, 2023. "Reinforcement learning in deregulated energy market: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    16. Leonori, Stefano & Martino, Alessio & Frattale Mascioli, Fabio Massimo & Rizzi, Antonello, 2020. "Microgrid Energy Management Systems Design by Computational Intelligence Techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    17. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Optimal operation and maintenance of energy storage systems in grid-connected microgrids by deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    18. Shahriari, M. & Cervone, G. & Clemente-Harding, L. & Delle Monache, L., 2020. "Using the analog ensemble method as a proxy measurement for wind power predictability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 789-801.
    19. de la Hoz, Jordi & Martín, Helena & Alonso, Alex & Carolina Luna, Adriana & Matas, José & Vasquez, Juan C. & Guerrero, Josep M., 2019. "Regulatory-framework-embedded energy management system for microgrids: The case study of the Spanish self-consumption scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Emilio Ghiani & Alessandro Serpi & Virginia Pilloni & Giuliana Sias & Marco Simone & Gianluca Marcialis & Giuliano Armano & Paolo Attilio Pegoraro, 2018. "A Multidisciplinary Approach for the Development of Smart Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-29, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:5882-:d:443189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.