IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i1p219-d304519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Environmental Energy Behavior in the Military: Assessing Behavior Change Factors at a Selected Military Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Rasa Smaliukiene

    (General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, 10322 Vilnius, Lithuania
    Department of Creative Communication, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio 11a, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Gintaras Labutis

    (General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, 10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Ausrius Juozapavicius

    (General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, 10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how pro-environmental energy behavior is manifested at a military unit and what behavioral change factors can enhance such behavior. The military unit represents an organization dominated by an exceptionally strong sense of community and belonging where individual pro-environmental energy behavior goes in line with a collective one. The application of Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) approach led to a better understanding of energy-saving behavior in the military as an organization where personnel are trained to increase their awareness of their peers’ behavior. Methods: The results were obtained using data collected from two independent samples of both professional soldiers and conscripts at a military unit of Lithuanian defense forces located in a fixed installation in the time frame of 2018–2019. The total sample of respondents (professional soldiers and conscripts) was N = 454. A series of statistical tests were performed at the 0.05 level of confidence. Results: An extended COM-B model for the analysis of pro-environmental energy behavior in the military was proposed and applied. The results show that the three behavioral change factors—capability, opportunity, and motivation—are first of all positively linked with the collective energy behavior at the military unit and only then with the individual soldier’s pro-environmental energy behavior. This is a new insight into the COM-B model as collective and individual behavior are identified as separate indicators and then combined into a single measurable construct. In addition, the results indicate that in the military unit, communality plays an important role in sustaining pro-environmental energy behavior, even if an individual behavior indicates low-involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasa Smaliukiene & Gintaras Labutis & Ausrius Juozapavicius, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Energy Behavior in the Military: Assessing Behavior Change Factors at a Selected Military Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:219-:d:304519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jozef Kuril, 2018. "Public administration for safe and secure environment: case of Slovak Republic," Post-Print hal-01773586, HAL.
    2. Peng Jiang & Shengjun Huang & Tao Zhang, 2019. "Optimal Deception Strategies in Power System Fortification against Deliberate Attacks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Rasa SmaliukienÄ— & Rasa SmaliukienÄ— & Salvatore Monni, 2019. "A step-by-step approach to social marketing in energy transition," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(1), pages 19-32, March.
    4. Mikhail Nikolaevich Dudin & Mikhail Nikolaevich Dudin & Natalia Pavlovna Ivashchenko & Alexander Georgievich Gurinovich & Oleg Mikhailovich Tolmachev & Lidiya Aleksandrovna Sonina, 2019. "Environmental entrepreneurship: characteristics of organization and development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1861-1871, June.
    5. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    6. Ion A. Iftimie, 2018. "Expeditionary energy economics (e3): the securitization of energy entrepreneurship during megacity counterinsurgencies (a NATO perspective)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Lahcen El Iysaouy & Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Mhammed Lahbabi & Abdelmajid Oumnad, 2019. "Towards energy efficiency: case of Morocco," Post-Print hal-02189638, HAL.
    8. Aswin Uvaraj Ganesan & Sathyanarayanan Nandhagopal & Arvind Shiyam Venkat & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & John K. Pedersen & Lenin Natesan Chokkalingam & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Single-Phase Electrical Machine for Military Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Antonio Paone & Jean-Philippe Bacher, 2018. "The Impact of Building Occupant Behavior on Energy Efficiency and Methods to Influence It: A Review of the State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Ludmila Kormishkina & Evgenii Kormishkin & Vladimir Gorin & Dmitrii Koloskov & Ludmila Koroleva, 2019. "Environmental investment: the most adequate neo-industrial response to the growth dilemma of the economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 929-948, December.
    11. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    12. Jozef Kuril, 2018. "Public administration for safe and secure environment: case of Slovak Republic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 493-501, March.
    13. Lahcen El Iysaouy & Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Mhammed Lahbabi & Abdelmajid Oumnad, 2019. "Towards energy efficiency: case of Morocco," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(3), pages 259-271, September.
    14. Saritas, Ozcan & Burmaoglu, Serhat, 2016. "Future of sustainable military operations under emerging energy and security considerations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 331-343.
    15. Daiva Dumciuviene & Akvile Cibinskiene & Meda Andrijauskiene, 2019. "Determinants of Energy Saving: Evidence from a Vocational School in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rasa Smaliukienė & Svajone Bekesiene & Asta Mažeikienė & Gerry Larsson & Dovilė Karčiauskaitė & Eglė Mazgelytė & Ramutė Vaičaitienė, 2022. "Hair Cortisol, Perceived Stress, and the Effect of Group Dynamics: A Longitudinal Study of Young Men during Compulsory Military Training in Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Trifonov & Dmitry Trukhan & Yury Koshlich & Valeriy Prasolov & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2021. "Influence of the Share of Renewable Energy Sources on the Level of Energy Security in EECCA Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Daniel FAGGIANELLI & Sorin BURLACU & Cécile CARRA, 2018. "Victimization Of Health Professionals In Bucharest Service Relations And Social Work Relationships," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 109-126, June.
    3. Ladislav MURA & Dominika VLACSEKOVÁ, 2018. "Motivation Of Public Employees: Case Study Of Slovak Teaching And Professional Staf," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 67-80, December.
    4. Darya Pyatkina & Tamara Shcherbina & Vadim Samusenkov & Irina Razinkina & Mariusz Sroka, 2021. "Modeling and Management of Power Supply Enterprises’ Cash Flows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Serhiy Lyeonov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Dalia Štreimikienė & Grzegorz Mentel, 2019. "Assessment of Green Investments’ Impact on Sustainable Development: Linking Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    6. El Asri, Najat & Nouira, Youness & Maaroufi, Ibtissam & Marfak, Abdelghafour & Saleh, Nour & Mharzi, Mohammed, 2022. "The policy of energy management in public buildings procurements through the study of the process of delegated project management - Case of Morocco," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Olga Finogentova & Vasiliy Tokarev & Mikhail Petrenko & Tatyana Primak, 2018. "Acceptance criterion of state coercion in contemporary society," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 820-829, December.
    8. Wadim Strielkowski & Irina Firsova & Inna Lukashenko & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Effective Management of Energy Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of ICT Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Smirnova, Elena & Kot, Sebastian & Kolpak, Eugeny & Shestak, Viktor, 2021. "Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Yelena Petrenko & Igor Denisov & Gaukhar Koshebayeva & Valeriy Biryukov, 2020. "Energy Efficiency of Kazakhstan Enterprises: Unexpected Findings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Emil Velinov & Yelena Petrenko & Elena Vechkinzova & Igor Denisov & Luis Ochoa Siguencia & Zofia Gródek-Szostak, 2020. "“Leaky Bucket” of Kazakhstan’s Power Grid: Losses and Inefficient Distribution of Electric Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Mihaela Simionescu & Adam Wojciechowski & Arkadiusz Tomczyk & Marcin Rabe, 2021. "Revised Environmental Kuznets Curve for V4 Countries and Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Alexander Melnik & Kirill Ermolaev, 2020. "Strategy Context of Decision Making for Improved Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2023. "Towards Renewable Energy: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-2, February.
    16. Shahin Bayramov & Iurii Prokazov & Sergey Kondrashev & Jan Kowalik, 2021. "Household Electricity Generation as a Way of Energy Independence of States—Social Context of Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Vision 2023: Status quo and future of biomass and coal for sustainable energy generation in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 800-808.
    18. Bożena Gajdzik & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2021. "Resource Intensity vs. Investment in Production Installations—The Case of the Steel Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Marcin Sitek & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Innovation Management in Polish Real Estate Developers in the Renewable Energy Sources Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Marina Gennadievna Nikitina & Viktoriya Viktorovna Pobirchenko & Elena Alekseevna Shutaieva & Anna Ivanovna Karlova, 2018. "The investment component in a nation’s economic security: the case of the Russian Federation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 958-967, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:219-:d:304519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.