IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i1p215-d304406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Construction Duration and Schedule Robustness Based on Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer with Sine Cosine Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Mengqi Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xiaoling Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jia Yu

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Lei Bi

    (CCCC Water Transportation Consultants Co., Ltd., Beijing 100007, China)

  • Yao Xiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jun Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Construction duration and schedule robustness are of great importance to ensure efficient construction. However, the current literature has neglected the importance of schedule robustness. Relatively little attention has been paid to schedule robustness via deviation of an activity’s starting time, which does not consider schedule robustness via structural deviation caused by the logical relationships among activities. This leads to a possibility of deviation between the planned schedule and the actual situation. Thus, an optimization model of construction duration and schedule robustness is proposed to solve this problem. Firstly, duration and two robustness criteria including starting time deviation and structural deviation were selected as the optimization objectives. Secondly, critical chain method and starting time criticality (STC) method were adopted to allocate buffers to the schedule in order to generate alternative schedules for optimization. Thirdly, hybrid grey wolf optimizer with sine cosine algorithm (HGWOSCA) was proposed to solve the optimization model. The movement directions and speed of grey wolf optimizer (GWO) was improved by sine cosine algorithm (SCA) so that the algorithm’s performance of convergence, diversity, accuracy, and distribution improved. Finally, an underground power station in China was used for a case study, by which the applicability and advantages of the proposed model were proved.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengqi Zhao & Xiaoling Wang & Jia Yu & Lei Bi & Yao Xiao & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Optimization of Construction Duration and Schedule Robustness Based on Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer with Sine Cosine Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:215-:d:304406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cui, Nanfang & Demeulemeester, Erik & Bie, Li, 2016. "Incorporation of activity sensitivity measures into buffer management to manage project schedule riskAuthor-Name: Hu, Xuejun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 717-727.
    2. Rui Oliveira & António Figueiredo & Romeu Vicente & Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida, 2018. "Multi-Objective Optimisation of the Energy Performance of Lightweight Constructions Combining Evolutionary Algorithms and Life Cycle Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Shuyu Dai & Dongxiao Niu & Yan Li, 2018. "Daily Peak Load Forecasting Based on Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise and Support Vector Machine Optimized by Modified Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2011. "Robust Project Scheduling," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 3(3–4), pages 201-376, January.
    5. Clemente-Císcar, M. & San Matías, S. & Giner-Bosch, V., 2014. "A methodology based on profitability criteria for defining the partial defection of customers in non-contractual settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 276-285.
    6. Bruni, M.E. & Di Puglia Pugliese, L. & Beraldi, P. & Guerriero, F., 2017. "An adjustable robust optimization model for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 66-84.
    7. Shuai Liu & Zhong-Kai Feng & Wen-Jing Niu & Hai-Rong Zhang & Zhen-Guo Song, 2019. "Peak Operation Problem Solving for Hydropower Reservoirs by Elite-Guide Sine Cosine Algorithm with Gaussian Local Search and Random Mutation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Xuejun Hu & Erik Demeulemeester & Nanfang Cui & Jianjiang Wang & Wendi Tian, 2017. "Improved critical chain buffer management framework considering resource costs and schedule stability," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 159-183, June.
    9. Kingsuk Majumdar & Puja Das & Provas Kumar Roy & Subrata Banerjee, 2017. "Solving OPF Problems using Biogeography Based and Grey Wolf Optimization Techniques," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 55-77, July.
    10. Jun Zhang & Denghua Zhong & Mengqi Zhao & Jia Yu & Fei Lv, 2019. "An Optimization Model for Construction Stage and Zone Plans of Rockfill Dams Based on the Enhanced Whale Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Lambrechts, Olivier & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "A tabu search procedure for developing robust predictive project schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 493-508, February.
    12. Olivier Lambrechts & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2011. "Time slack-based techniques for robust project scheduling subject to resource uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 443-464, June.
    13. Singh, Diljinder & Dhillon, J.S., 2019. "Ameliorated grey wolf optimization for economic load dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 398-419.
    14. Kobylanski, Przemyslaw & Kuchta, Dorota, 2007. "A note on the paper by M. A. Al-Fawzan and M. Haouari about a bi-objective problem for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 496-501, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Hussein & Abdelrahman E. E. Eltoukhy & Amos Darko & Amr Eltawil, 2021. "Simulation-Optimization for the Planning of Off-Site Construction Projects: A Comparative Study of Recent Swarm Intelligence Metaheuristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    3. Xuejun Hu & Jianjiang Wang & Kaijun Leng, 2019. "The Interaction Between Critical Chain Sequencing, Buffer Sizing, and Reactive Actions in a CC/BM Framework," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Masoud Arjmand & Amir Abbas Najafi & Majid Ebrahimzadeh, 2020. "Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective stochastic resource availability cost problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(3), pages 935-985, September.
    5. Bruni, M.E. & Di Puglia Pugliese, L. & Beraldi, P. & Guerriero, F., 2017. "An adjustable robust optimization model for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 66-84.
    6. Farnaz Torabi Yeganeh & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization approach to project scheduling with resiliency criteria under uncertain activity duration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 161-196, February.
    7. Min Wang & Guoshan Liu & Xinyu Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Optimization of the Multi-Skilled Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Uncertainty in Resource Availability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Janusz Kulejewski & Nabi Ibadov & Jerzy Rosłon & Jacek Zawistowski, 2021. "Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Majid Askarifard & Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi & Mehran Sepehri & Ehsanollah Zeighami, 2021. "A robust multi-objective optimization model for project scheduling considering risk and sustainable development criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11494-11524, August.
    10. HazIr, Öncü & Erel, Erdal & Günalay, Yavuz, 2011. "Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 87-95, March.
    11. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Bing Wang & Xingbao Han & Xianxia Zhang & Shaohua Zhang, 2015. "Predictive-reactive scheduling for single surgical suite subject to random emergency surgery," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 949-966, November.
    13. HazIr, Öncü & Haouari, Mohamed & Erel, Erdal, 2010. "Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 633-643, December.
    14. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    15. Zdeněk Hanzálek & Přemysl Šůcha, 2017. "Time symmetry of resource constrained project scheduling with general temporal constraints and take-give resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 209-237, January.
    16. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    17. D. Laurie Hughes & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "Elucidation of IS project success factors: an interpretive structural modelling approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 35-66, February.
    18. Sleptchenko, Andrei & Al Hanbali, Ahmad & Zijm, Henk, 2018. "Joint planning of service engineers and spare parts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 97-108.
    19. António Figueiredo & Filipe Rebelo & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Rui Oliveira & Sérgio Lousada & Romeu Vicente & Victor M. Ferreira, 2020. "Implementation and Challenges of the Passive House Concept in Portugal: Lessons Learnt from Successful Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:215-:d:304406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.