IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5235-d425000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Strategic Capacity Withholding from Distributed Energy Storage within Microgrids Providing Energy and Reserve Services

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando J. Lanas

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile)

  • Francisco J. Martínez-Conde

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile)

  • Diego Alvarado

    (Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Beauchef 851, Santiago 8370456, Chile)

  • Rodrigo Moreno

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile
    Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Beauchef 851, Santiago 8370456, Chile
    Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Patricio Mendoza-Araya

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile
    Energy Center FCFM, Universidad de Chile, Plaza Ercilla 847, Santiago 8370450, Chile)

  • Guillermo Jiménez-Estévez

    (Energy Center FCFM, Universidad de Chile, Plaza Ercilla 847, Santiago 8370450, Chile
    Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

Abstract

Microgrids have the potential to provide security and flexibility to power systems through the integration of a wide range of resources, including distributed energy storage, usually in the form of batteries. An aggregation of microgrids can enable the participation of these resources in the main system’s energy and ancillary services market. The traditional minimum-cost operation, however, can undermine microgrid’s ability to hold reserve capacity for operation in islanded mode and can rapidly degrade distributed batteries. This paper studies the impacts of various operational strategies from distributed energy storage plants on their revenues and on market prices, considering an array of microgrids that act in a synchronized fashion. The operational model minimizes the entire electric power system cost, considering transmission-connected and distributed energy resources, and capturing capacity degradation of batteries as part of the cost function. Additionally, microgrid-based, distributed batteries can provide energy arbitrage and both system-level and microgrid-level security services. Through several case studies, we demonstrate the economic impacts of distributed energy storage providing these services, including also capacity degradation. We also demonstrate the benefits of providing reserve services in terms of extra revenue and battery lifespan. Finally, we conclude that limitations in the provision of system-level services from distributed batteries due to degradation considerations and higher microgrid-level security requirements may, counterintuitively, increase system-level revenues for storage owners, if such degradation considerations and microgrid-level security requirements are adopted, at once, by a large number of microgrids, leading to unintended, non-strategic capacity withholding by distributed storage owners.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando J. Lanas & Francisco J. Martínez-Conde & Diego Alvarado & Rodrigo Moreno & Patricio Mendoza-Araya & Guillermo Jiménez-Estévez, 2020. "Non-Strategic Capacity Withholding from Distributed Energy Storage within Microgrids Providing Energy and Reserve Services," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5235-:d:425000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel Diaz, Francisco D. Munoz, and Rodrigo Moreno, 2020. "Equilibrium Analysis of a Tax on Carbon Emissions with Pass-through Restrictions and Side-payment Rules," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 93-122.
    2. Diaz, Gabriel & Inzunza, Andrés & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2019. "The importance of time resolution, operational flexibility and risk aversion in quantifying the value of energy storage in long-term energy planning studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 797-812.
    3. Majzoobi, Alireza & Khodaei, Amin, 2017. "Application of microgrids in providing ancillary services to the utility grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 555-563.
    4. Paul L. Joskow & Edward Kohn, 2002. "A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 1-35.
    5. Paul Joskow & Edward Kahn, 2002. "A quantitative analysis of pricing behaviour in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000: the final word," Working Papers EP02, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    6. Hao Liang & Weihua Zhuang, 2014. "Stochastic Modeling and Optimization in a Microgrid: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Richard Green, 2004. "Did English Generators Play Cournot? Capacity withholding in the Electricity Pool," Working Papers 0410, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
    8. Giulio Ferro & Riccardo Minciardi & Luca Parodi & Michela Robba & Mansueto Rossi, 2020. "Optimal Control of Multiple Microgrids and Buildings by an Aggregator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Eid, Cherrelle & Codani, Paul & Perez, Yannick & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 237-247.
    10. Wenhao Zhuo & Andrey V. Savkin, 2019. "Profit Maximizing Control of a Microgrid with Renewable Generation and BESS Based on a Battery Cycle Life Model and Energy Price Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Wang, Jianxiao & Zhong, Haiwang & Tang, Wenyuan & Rajagopal, Ram & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Wang, Yi, 2017. "Optimal bidding strategy for microgrids in joint energy and ancillary service markets considering flexible ramping products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 294-303.
    12. Wolf-Peter Schill & Claudia Kemfert, 2011. "Modeling Strategic Electricity Storage: The Case of Pumped Hydro Storage in Germany," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 59-88.
    13. Cherrelle Eid & Paul Codani & Yannick Perez & Javier Reneses & Rudi Hakvoort, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Post-Print hal-01792419, HAL.
    14. Danny Espín-Sarzosa & Rodrigo Palma-Behnke & Oscar Núñez-Mata, 2020. "Energy Management Systems for Microgrids: Main Existing Trends in Centralized Control Architectures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Ouyang, Minggao & Feng, Xuning & Han, Xuebing & Lu, Languang & Li, Zhe & He, Xiangming, 2016. "A dynamic capacity degradation model and its applications considering varying load for a large format Li-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 48-59.
    16. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Habibi, Daryoush, 2018. "Overview of energy storage systems in distribution networks: Placement, sizing, operation, and power quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1205-1230.
    17. Yongli Wang & Haiyang Yu & Mingyue Yong & Yujing Huang & Fuli Zhang & Xiaohai Wang, 2018. "Optimal Scheduling of Integrated Energy Systems with Combined Heat and Power Generation, Photovoltaic and Energy Storage Considering Battery Lifetime Loss," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Zhou, Yutian & Panteli, Mathaios & Moreno, Rodrigo & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2018. "System-level assessment of reliability and resilience provision from microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 374-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Hong & Wang, Shengwei, 2022. "Multi-level optimal dispatch strategy and profit-sharing mechanism for unlocking energy flexibilities of non-residential building clusters in electricity markets of multiple flexibility services," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 35-45.
    2. Backe, Stian & Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Schwabeneder, Daniel & Auer, Hans & Korpås, Magnus & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2022. "Impact of energy communities on the European electricity and heating system decarbonization pathway: Comparing local and global flexibility responses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Konstantinos Oureilidis & Kyriaki-Nefeli Malamaki & Konstantinos Gallos & Achilleas Tsitsimelis & Christos Dikaiakos & Spyros Gkavanoudis & Milos Cvetkovic & Juan Manuel Mauricio & Jose Maria Maza Ort, 2020. "Ancillary Services Market Design in Distribution Networks: Review and Identification of Barriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-44, February.
    4. Gržanić, M. & Capuder, T. & Zhang, N. & Huang, W., 2022. "Prosumers as active market participants: A systematic review of evolution of opportunities, models and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    7. Rancilio, G. & Rossi, A. & Falabretti, D. & Galliani, A. & Merlo, M., 2022. "Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Felix Garcia-Torres & Ascension Zafra-Cabeza & Carlos Silva & Stephane Grieu & Tejaswinee Darure & Ana Estanqueiro, 2021. "Model Predictive Control for Microgrid Functionalities: Review and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Matthias Janssen & Magnus Wobben, "undated". "Electricity Pricing and Market Power - Evidence from Germany," Working Papers 200121, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    10. Cherrelle Eid & Rudi Hakvoort & Martin de Jong, 2016. "Global trends in the political economy of smart grids: A tailored perspective on 'smart' for grids in transition," WIDER Working Paper Series 022, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Konstantinos Kotsalos & Ismael Miranda & Nuno Silva & Helder Leite, 2019. "A Horizon Optimization Control Framework for the Coordinated Operation of Multiple Distributed Energy Resources in Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. David P. Brown & Derek E. H. Olmstead, 2017. "Measuring market power and the efficiency of Alberta's restructured electricity market: An energy-only market design," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 838-870, August.
    13. Pearson, Simon & Wellnitz, Sonja & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hashemipour, Naser, 2022. "The value of TSO-DSO coordination in re-dispatch with flexible decentralized energy sources: Insights for Germany in 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    14. Simshauser, P., 2020. "Merchant utilities and boundaries of the firm: vertical integration in energy-only markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2039, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Ajla Mehinovic & Matej Zajc & Nermin Suljanovic, 2023. "Interpretation and Quantification of the Flexibility Sources Location on the Flexibility Service in the Distribution Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Patrick Sunday Onen & Geev Mokryani & Rana H. A. Zubo, 2022. "Planning of Multi-Vector Energy Systems with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Source: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Joao C. Ferreira & Ana Lucia Martins, 2018. "Building a Community of Users for Open Market Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    19. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18938 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Lewis Evans & Graeme Guthrie, 2009. "How Options Provided by Storage Affect Electricity Prices," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(3), pages 681-702, January.
    21. Elizabeth J. Durango‐Cohen & Liad Wagman, 2014. "Strategic obfuscation of production capacities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 244-267, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5235-:d:425000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.