IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4910-d415914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Stage Transmission Network Planning Considering Transmission Congestion in the Power Market

Author

Listed:
  • Yixin Huang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Xinyi Liu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Zhi Zhang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Li Yang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Zhenzhi Lin

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    School of Electrical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)

  • Yangqing Dan

    (State Grid Zhejiang Economic Research Institute, Hangzhou 310016, China)

  • Ke Sun

    (State Grid Zhejiang Economic Research Institute, Hangzhou 310016, China)

  • Zhou Lan

    (State Grid Zhejiang Economic Research Institute, Hangzhou 310016, China)

  • Keping Zhu

    (State Grid Zhejiang Economic Research Institute, Hangzhou 310016, China)

Abstract

The uncertainty of generation and load increases in the transmission network in the power market. Considering the transmission congestion risk caused by various uncertainties of the transmission network, the optimal operation strategies of the transmission network under various operational scenarios are decided, aiming for the maximum of social benefit for the evaluation of the degree of scenario congestion. Then, a screening method for major congestion scenario is proposed based on the shadow price theory. With the goal of maximizing the difference between the social benefits and the investment and maintenance costs of transmission lines under major congestion scenarios, a multi-stage transmission network planning model based on major congestion scenarios is proposed to determine the configuration of transmission lines in each planning stage. In this paper, the multi-stage transmission network planning is a mixed integer linear programming problem. The DC power flow model and the commercial optimization software CPLEX are applied to solve the problem to obtain the planning scheme. The improved six-node Garver power system and the simplified 25-node power system of Zhejiang Province, China are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed multi-stage planning model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixin Huang & Xinyi Liu & Zhi Zhang & Li Yang & Zhenzhi Lin & Yangqing Dan & Ke Sun & Zhou Lan & Keping Zhu, 2020. "Multi-Stage Transmission Network Planning Considering Transmission Congestion in the Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4910-:d:415914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens Weibezahn & Mario Kendziorski, 2019. "Illustrating the Benefits of Openness: A Large-Scale Spatial Economic Dispatch Model Using the Julia Language," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Mingxing Wu & Zhilin Lu & Qing Chen & Tao Zhu & En Lu & Wentian Lu & Mingbo Liu, 2020. "A Two-Stage Algorithm of Locational Marginal Price Calculation Subject to Carbon Emission Allowance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Jingqi Sun & Nuermaimaiti Ruze & Jianjun Zhang & Haoran Zhao & Boyang Shen, 2019. "Evaluating the Investment Efficiency of China’s Provincial Power Grid Enterprises under New Electricity Market Reform: Empirical Evidence Based on Three-Stage DEA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Zeng, Ming & Yang, Yongqi & Wang, Lihua & Sun, Jinghui, 2016. "The power industry reform in China 2015: Policies, evaluations and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 94-110.
    5. Zipeng Liang & Haoyong Chen & Xiaojuan Wang & Idris Ibn Idris & Bifei Tan & Cong Zhang, 2018. "An Extreme Scenario Method for Robust Transmission Expansion Planning with Wind Power Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Changgi Min, 2020. "Impact Analysis of Transmission Congestion on Power System Flexibility in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Guan Wang & Zhongfu Tan & Hongyu Lin & Qingkun Tan & Shenbo Yang & Liwei Ju & Zhongrui Ren, 2019. "Multi-Level Market Transaction Optimization Model for Electricity Sales Companies with Energy Storage Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Xiaodong & Patino-Echeverri, Dalia & Li, Mingquan & Wu, Libo, 2022. "A review of publicly available data sources for models to study renewables integration in China's power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Xiaojing Hu & Haoling Min & Sai Dai & Zhi Cai & Xiaonan Yang & Qiang Ding & Zhanyong Yang & Feng Xiao, 2022. "Research on Maintenance Strategies for Different Transmission Sections to Improve the Consumption Rate Based on a Renewable Energy Production Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Cheng Xin & Kailin Ji & Hao Chang & Yang Li & Ya-Qiong Liu, 2022. "Price Co-Movement between Electrical Equipment and Metal Commodities—A Time-Frequency Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Leonard Goke & Jens Weibezahn & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2021. "A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios," Papers 2112.04821, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    3. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Wei, Wei & Han, Ying & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Ma, Jingjing & Chai, Shanglei, 2023. "Empirical study on the technical efficiency and total factor productivity of power industry: Evidence from Chinese provinces," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Sergio Cantillo-Luna & Ricardo Moreno-Chuquen & Harold R. Chamorro & Jose Miguel Riquelme-Dominguez & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt, 2022. "Locational Marginal Price Forecasting Using SVR-Based Multi-Output Regression in Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Cost of long distance electricity transmission in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 132-140.
    7. Yongxiu He & Meiyan Wang & Jinxiong Yu & Qing He & Huijun Sun & Fengyu Su, 2020. "Research on the Hybrid Recommendation Method of Retail Electricity Price Package Based on Power User Characteristics and Multi-Attribute Utility in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Jin, Xiaolong & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie & Wu, Jianzhong & Xu, Xiandong & Yu, Xiaodan, 2016. "Optimal day-ahead scheduling of integrated urban energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Haokai Xie & Pu Zhao & Xudong Ji & Qun Lin & Lianguang Liu, 2019. "Expansion Planning Method of the Industrial Park Integrated Energy System Considering Regret Aversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Marian Kampik & Marcin Fice & Adam Pilśniak & Krzysztof Bodzek & Anna Piaskowy, 2023. "An Analysis of Energy Consumption in Small- and Medium-Sized Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Ming, Zeng & Ping, Zhang & Shunkun, Yu & Hui, Liu, 2017. "Overall review of the overcapacity situation of China’s thermal power industry: Status quo, policy analysis and suggestions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 768-774.
    12. Cheng, Chuntian & Chen, Fu & Li, Gang & Ristić, Bora & Mirchi, Ali & Qiyu, Tu & Madani, Kaveh, 2018. "Reform and renewables in China: The architecture of Yunnan's hydropower dominated electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 682-693.
    13. Victor H. Hinojosa & Joaquín Sepúlveda, 2020. "Solving the Stochastic Generation and Transmission Capacity Planning Problem Applied to Large-Scale Power Systems Using Generalized Shift-Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Sun, Kege & Wu, Libo, 2020. "Efficiency distortion of the power generation sector under the dual regulation of price and quantity in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Qin, Quande & Liu, Yuan & Huang, Jia-Ping, 2020. "A cooperative game analysis for the allocation of carbon emissions reduction responsibility in China's power industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Jun Dong & Huijuan Huo & Sen Guo, 2016. "Demand Side Management Performance Evaluation for Commercial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    18. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    19. She, Zhen-Yu & Meng, Gang & Xie, Bai-Chen & O'Neill, Eoghan, 2020. "The effectiveness of the unbundling reform in China’s power system from a dynamic efficiency perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    20. Guo, Hongye & Davidson, Michael R. & Chen, Qixin & Zhang, Da & Jiang, Nan & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Zhang, Xiliang, 2020. "Power market reform in China: Motivations, progress, and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4910-:d:415914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.