IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i15p3925-d393008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wastewater Treatment Plant: Modelling and Validation of an Activated Sludge Process

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Calise

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Ursula Eicker

    (Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University Montreal, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Juergen Schumacher

    (Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University Montreal, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Maria Vicidomini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to develop a reliable and accurate model of the wastewater biochemical treatment process and to explore the behaviour through a general dynamic simulation environment, namely the INtegrated Simulation Environment Language (INSEL), for the analysis of the energy demand of the whole wastewater treatment plant. In particular, the presented model pays special attention to the chemical kinetics involved in the activated sludge process for the reduction of nitrogen and carbon compounds. According to the best practices, the plant configuration considered in this work includes the denitrification-nitrification process, performed by completely mixed reactors. In particular, the process analysed in this paper is based on the Ludzak-Ettinger process. The biological process is simulated according to the well-known method widely used in the literature, namely the Activated Sludge Model No 1 (ASM1). The model includes a set of equations for the calculation of aerobic growth of heterotrophs, anoxic growth of heterotrophs, aerobic growth of autotrophs, decay of autotrophs, ammonification of soluble nitrogen, hydrolysis of entrapped organics, and hydrolysis of entrapped organic nitrogen. All these equations, along with energy and mass balances, are solved by the explicit Euler method. The developed model is validated using literature data, showing a great accuracy (deviation below 1%). As for the temperature, results show that, between 15 and 25 °C, in the initial part of the process, transport effects dominate the consumption ones. When the temperature is higher than 30 °C, nitrate consumption is so fast that biomass growth is limited by this effect. Conversely, in case of low temperatures (5–10 °C), biomass growth is not limited by nitrate availability. Finally, results also showed that temperature significantly affects the denitrification process, whereas the effect on the oxygen is lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Calise & Ursula Eicker & Juergen Schumacher & Maria Vicidomini, 2020. "Wastewater Treatment Plant: Modelling and Validation of an Activated Sludge Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3925-:d:393008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Mintz, Marianne M. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: Challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 346-362.
    2. Filipe, Jorge & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Reis, Marisa & Alves, Rita & Póvoa, Pedro, 2019. "Data-driven predictive energy optimization in a wastewater pumping station," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Longo, Stefano & d’Antoni, Benedetto Mirko & Bongards, Michael & Chaparro, Antonio & Cronrath, Andreas & Fatone, Francesco & Lema, Juan M. & Mauricio-Iglesias, Miguel & Soares, Ana & Hospido, Almudena, 2016. "Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1251-1268.
    4. Francesco Calise & Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Massimo Dentice d’Accadia & Alessandra Infante & Maria Vicidomini, 2020. "Modeling of the Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Wastes: Integration of Heat Transfer and Biochemical Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Wang, Jiawei & You, Shi & Zong, Yi & Træholt, Chresten & Dong, Zhao Yang & Zhou, You, 2019. "Flexibility of combined heat and power plants: A review of technologies and operation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Zhang, Zijun & Kusiak, Andrew & Zeng, Yaohui & Wei, Xiupeng, 2016. "Modeling and optimization of a wastewater pumping system with data-mining methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 303-311.
    7. Picardo, Alberto & Soltero, Victor M. & Peralta, M. Estela & Chacartegui, Ricardo, 2019. "District heating based on biogas from wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 649-664.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mónica Vergara-Araya & Verena Hilgenfeldt & Di Peng & Heidrun Steinmetz & Jürgen Wiese, 2021. "Modelling to Lower Energy Consumption in a Large WWTP in China While Optimising Nitrogen Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Calise & Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Massimo Dentice d’Accadia & Alessandra Infante & Maria Vicidomini, 2020. "Modeling of the Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Wastes: Integration of Heat Transfer and Biochemical Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Luca Cimmino & Marialuisa Napolitano & Maria Vicidomini, 2022. "Thermoeconomic Analysis of Biomethane Production Plants: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Johnson, Hilary A. & Simon, Kevin P. & Slocum, Alexander H., 2021. "Data analytics and pump control in a wastewater treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    4. Zhu, Wenjing & Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Energy efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China based on multiregional input–output analysis and data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    5. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á & Casey, Eoin & Bertsch, Valentin, 2019. "Demand response within the energy-for-water-nexus: A review," Papers WP637, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    6. Macintosh, C. & Astals, S. & Sembera, C. & Ertl, A. & Drewes, J.E. & Jensen, P.D. & Koch, K., 2019. "Successful strategies for increasing energy self-sufficiency at Grüneck wastewater treatment plant in Germany by food waste co-digestion and improved aeration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 797-808.
    7. Guven, Huseyin & Ersahin, Mustafa Evren & Dereli, Recep Kaan & Ozgun, Hale & Isik, Isa & Ozturk, Izzet, 2019. "Energy recovery potential of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge from high-rate activated sludge systems co-treating municipal wastewater and food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1027-1036.
    8. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Bertsch, Valentin & Casey, Eoin, 2020. "Modelling demand response with process models and energy systems models: Potential applications for wastewater treatment within the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Gu, Yifan & Li, Yue & Li, Xuyao & Luo, Pengzhou & Wang, Hongtao & Robinson, Zoe P. & Wang, Xin & Wu, Jiang & Li, Fengting, 2017. "The feasibility and challenges of energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1463-1475.
    10. Adam Masłoń & Joanna Czarnota & Aleksandra Szaja & Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak & Grzegorz Łagód, 2020. "The Enhancement of Energy Efficiency in a Wastewater Treatment Plant through Sustainable Biogas Use: Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Liu, Qipeng & Li, Ran & Dereli, Recep Kaan & Flynn, Damian & Casey, Eoin, 2022. "Water resource recovery facilities as potential energy generation units and their dynamic economic dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    12. Mancini, G. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Fatone, F. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2021. "A water-waste-energy nexus approach to bridge the sustainability gap in landfill-based waste management regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Luo, Li & Dzakpasu, Mawuli & Yang, Baichuan & Zhang, Wushou & Yang, Yahong & Wang, Xiaochang C., 2019. "A novel index of total oxygen demand for the comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption for urban wastewater treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 253-261.
    14. Odabaş Baş, Gözde & Aydınalp Köksal, Merih, 2022. "Environmental and techno-economic analysis of the integration of biogas and solar power systems into urban wastewater treatment plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 579-597.
    15. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    16. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Shifei Zhao & Chunlan Wang & Fan Duan & Ze Tian, 2024. "Thermodynamic Comparison of the Steam Ejectors Integrated at Different Locations in Cogeneration Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Omar, M.N. & Samak, A.A. & Keshek, M.H. & Elsisi, S.F., 2020. "Simulation and validation model for using the energy produced from broiler litter waste in their house and its requirement of energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 920-928.
    19. Andrea G. Capodaglio & Gustaf Olsson, 2019. "Energy Issues in Sustainable Urban Wastewater Management: Use, Demand Reduction and Recovery in the Urban Water Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Meng, Xiangmei & de Jong, Wiebren & Kudra, Tadeusz, 2016. "A state-of-the-art review of pulse combustion: Principles, modeling, applications and R&D issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3925-:d:393008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.