IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i11p2463-d1398990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Comparison of the Steam Ejectors Integrated at Different Locations in Cogeneration Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Shifei Zhao

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chunlan Wang

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fan Duan

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Ze Tian

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

Abstract

Under the challenge of global energy transition, coal-fired cogeneration systems are undergoing a technical revolution towards enhanced efficiency, heating capacity, and flexibility. In this paper, four schemes using a steam ejector integrated into a cogeneration system are designed. Considering operational safety, integrated locations are selected at the front and back of high- and medium-pressure turbines. Subsequently, the thermodynamic and operational characteristics under both design and off-design conditions are analyzed based on a model built in EBSILON Professional. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the heating process is conducted. The results show that the integration of steam ejectors can increase the waste heat recovery ratio of exhaust steam by 18.42–45.61% under design conditions. The largest waste heat recovery ratio is obtained in System 4, resulting in the power generation efficiency ( η g ) and gross energy utilization efficiency ( η p ) of 81.95% and 65.53%, respectively. Meanwhile, the steam ejector can expand the power-load regulation range of the cogeneration system, and System 4 has the lowest lower power limit among all the systems. The η p values of Systems 1–4 reach extreme values at different mixed steam pressures of the ejector. Increasing the pinch point temperature difference reduces the power load η g and η p of Systems 1–4. The results provide technical solutions for improving the heating capacity and efficient and flexible operation of cogeneration systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shifei Zhao & Chunlan Wang & Fan Duan & Ze Tian, 2024. "Thermodynamic Comparison of the Steam Ejectors Integrated at Different Locations in Cogeneration Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2463-:d:1398990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Neacșa & Mirela Panait & Jianu Daniel Mureșan & Marian Catalin Voica & Otilia Manta, 2022. "The Energy Transition between Desideratum and Challenge: Are Cogeneration and Trigeneration the Best Solution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Wang, Jiawei & You, Shi & Zong, Yi & Træholt, Chresten & Dong, Zhao Yang & Zhou, You, 2019. "Flexibility of combined heat and power plants: A review of technologies and operation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    3. Ji, Huichao & Wang, Haixin & Yang, Junyou & Feng, Jiawei & Yang, Yongyue & Okoye, Martin Onyeka, 2021. "Optimal schedule of solid electric thermal storage considering consumer behavior characteristics in combined electricity and heat networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Cașen Panaitescu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Bogdan Ionete & Alina Prundurel & Sorin Gal, 2023. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Mix—A Viable Perspective for Environment and Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-38, August.
    5. Liu, Hong & Zhao, Yue & Gu, Chenghong & Ge, Shaoyun & Yang, Zan, 2021. "Adjustable capability of the distributed energy system: Definition, framework, and evaluation model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Yu, Haiquan & Zhou, Jianxin & Si, Fengqi & Nord, Lars O., 2022. "Combined heat and power dynamic economic dispatch considering field operational characteristics of natural gas combined cycle plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    7. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Doru Bogdan Stoica, 2022. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Blending in Distribution Systems—An Energy, Economic, and Environmental Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Zhao, Guanjia & Cui, Zhipeng & Xu, Jing & Liu, Wenhao & Ma, Suxia, 2022. "Hybrid modeling-based digital twin for performance optimization with flexible operation in the direct air-cooling power unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    9. Berjawi, A.E.H. & Walker, S.L. & Patsios, C. & Hosseini, S.H.R., 2021. "An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Takeshita, Takuma & Aki, Hirohisa & Kawajiri, Kotaro & Ishida, Masayoshi, 2021. "Assessment of utilization of combined heat and power systems to provide grid flexibility alongside variable renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Wang, Shouxiang & Wang, Shaomin & Zhao, Qianyu & Dong, Shuai & Li, Hao, 2023. "Optimal dispatch of integrated energy station considering carbon capture and hydrogen demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    12. Diana Joița & Mirela Panait & Carmen-Elena Dobrotă & Alin Diniță & Adrian Neacșa & Laura Elly Naghi, 2023. "The European Dilemma—Energy Security or Green Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Tammo Zobel & Andreas Ritter & Christopher H. Onder, 2023. "The Faster the Better? Optimal Warm-Up Strategies for a Micro Combined Heat and Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Zheng, Jinfu & Zhou, Zhigang & Zhao, Jianing & Hu, Songtao & Wang, Jinda, 2021. "Effects of intermittent heating on an integrated heat and power dispatch system for wind power integration and corresponding operation regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    16. Zhuang, Wennan & Zhou, Suyang & Chen, Jinyi & Gu, Wei, 2024. "Operation optimization of electricity-steam coupled industrial energy system considering steam accumulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    17. Hamdi Abdi, 2023. "A Survey of Combined Heat and Power-Based Unit Commitment Problem: Optimization Algorithms, Case Studies, Challenges, and Future Directions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-36, October.
    18. Catalin Popescu & Simona Andreea Apostu & Irina Gabriela Rădulescu & Jianu Daniel Mureșan & Alina Gabriela Brezoi, 2024. "Energizing the Now: Navigating the Critical Landscape of Today’s Energy Challenges—An In-Depth Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-26, January.
    19. Zheng, Lingwei & Wu, Hao & Guo, Siqi & Sun, Xinyu, 2023. "Real-time dispatch of an integrated energy system based on multi-stage reinforcement learning with an improved action-choosing strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Elnaz Davoodi & Salar Balaei-Sani & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Mehdi Abapour, 2021. "Flexible Continuous-Time Modeling for Multi-Objective Day-Ahead Scheduling of CHP Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2463-:d:1398990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.