IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i12p3048-d370809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current State and Future Prospective of Repowering Wind Turbines: An Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Clemens Fuchs

    (Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

  • Joachim Kasten

    (Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

  • Maxi Vent

    (Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

Abstract

For over two decades, the construction of wind turbines in Germany has been supported by guaranteed feed-in tariffs determined by the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), the primary goal of which is climate protection, in addition to reducing the country’s dependence on the import of (finitely available) fossil fuels. After China and the United States, Germany ranks third worldwide in the production of wind energy. The number of onshore wind turbines in Germany has risen to approximately 30,000 plants, of which approximately 10,000 wind turbines will fall out of the guaranteed EEG funding window in the next one to two years. There are basically two alternatives for these wind turbines: either continuing operations, with the sale of electricity at relatively low and fluctuating electricity stock prices, or repowering, which opens access to the fixed feed-in tariffs for another 20 years. However, repowering has the disadvantages that an approval process must be carried out and the investor must participate in a tender. There is no guarantee for the granting of a building permit; economically feasible operations also depend on the fact that one can win a contract without the submitted price being set too low. This area of tension is illustrated by a wind farm in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and analysed economically. The investment in new, more efficient, and larger wind turbines currently promises a high return. The profitability of the investment in wind turbines is determined using the net present value (NPV) method. In addition, a risk analysis is carried out using stochastic simulation. As a result, the feed-in tariff contributes to over 95% of the variance in the net present value (NPV).

Suggested Citation

  • Clemens Fuchs & Joachim Kasten & Maxi Vent, 2020. "Current State and Future Prospective of Repowering Wind Turbines: An Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3048-:d:370809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Arnold, 2014. "A Pragmatic Guide to Real Options," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-39116-2, December.
    2. Tom Arnold, 2014. "How Net Present Value Is Implemented," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: A Pragmatic Guide to Real Options, chapter 0, pages 1-13, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Weschenfelder, Franciele & Farias, João Gabriel de & Kamal Ahmad, Muhammad, 2022. "Economic and sensitivity analysis on wind farm end-of-life strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Isabel C. Gil-García & Ana Fernández-Guillamón & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Angel Molina-García, 2021. "A Multi-Factorial Review of Repowering Wind Generation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Ahmed, Faraedoon & Foley, Aoife & Dowds, Carole & Johnston, Barry & Al Kez, Dlzar, 2024. "Assessing the engineering, environmental and economic aspects of repowering onshore wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    4. Vassilis Stavrakas & Nikos Kleanthis & Alexandros Flamos, 2020. "An Ex-Post Assessment of RES-E Support in Greece by Investigating the Monetary Flows and the Causal Relationships in the Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, September.
    5. de Simón-Martín, Miguel & Ciria-Garcés, Tomás & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & González-Martínez, Alberto, 2022. "Multi-dimensional barrier identification for wind farm repowering in Spain through an expert judgment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Sylwia Mrozowska & Jan A. Wendt & Krzysztof Tomaszewski, 2021. "The Challenges of Poland’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Anne P. M. Velenturf, 2021. "A Framework and Baseline for the Integration of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Offshore Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-41, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Gräfe & Michael Köhl, 2020. "Impacts of Future Crop Tree Release Treatments on Forest Carbon as REDD+ Mitigation Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Mohammadali Norouzi & Matti Lehtonen, 2019. "Providing Fault Ride-Through Capability of Turbo-Expander in a Thermal Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual & Juan Carlos Meléndez Rodríguez, 2021. "Sustainability in the Aerospace Sector, a Transition to Clean Energy: The E 2 -EVM Valuation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Tom Arnold & Timothy Falcon Crack & Adam Schwartz, 2022. "Embedding a net present value analysis into a binomial tree with a real option analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2924-2934, October.
    5. Jiao, Feng & Zhang, Chuanqian, 2022. "Lumpy investment and credit risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Fernando Cruz Aranda & Antonia Terán Bustamante, 2019. "Valuation of an investment project in research and development in the pharmaceutical industry," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 64(1), pages 43-44, Enero-Mar.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3048-:d:370809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.