IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i9p1585-d226044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Concepts to Increase the Dew Point Temperature for Thermal Energy Recovery from Flue Gas, Using Aspen ®

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliia Fedorova

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Pegah Aziziyanesfahani

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Vojislav Jovicic

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Ana Zbogar-Rasic

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Muhammad Jehanzaib Khan

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Antonio Delgado

    (Institute of Fluid Mechanics (LSTM), Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

Thermal energy of flue gases (FG) dissipating from industrial facilities into the environment, constitute around 20% of the total dissipated thermal energy. Being part of the FG, water vapour carries thermal energy out of the system in the form of the latent heat, which can be recovered by condensation, thus increasing the overall efficiency of an industrial process. The limiting factor in this case is the low dew point temperature (usually 40–60 °C) of the water vapour in the FG. The increase of the dew point temperature can be achieved by increasing the water content or pressure. Taking these measures as a basis, the presented work investigated the following concepts for increasing the dew point temperature: humidification of the flue gas using water, humidification using steam, compression of the FG and usage of the steam ejector. Modelling of these concepts was performed using the commercial software Aspen ® . The humidification of the FG using water resulted in the negligible increase in the dew point (3 °C). Using steam humidification the temperatures of up to 92 °C were reached, while the use of steam ejector led to few degrees higher dew point temperatures. However, both concepts proved to be energy demanding, due to the energy requirements for the steam generation. The FG compression enabled the achievement of a 97 °C dew point temperature, being both energy-efficient and exhibiting the lowest energy cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliia Fedorova & Pegah Aziziyanesfahani & Vojislav Jovicic & Ana Zbogar-Rasic & Muhammad Jehanzaib Khan & Antonio Delgado, 2019. "Investigation of the Concepts to Increase the Dew Point Temperature for Thermal Energy Recovery from Flue Gas, Using Aspen ®," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1585-:d:226044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Price, Lynn, 2012. "A review of energy use and energy efficiency technologies for the textile industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3648-3665.
    2. Yue Hu & Yachi Gao & Hui Lv & Gang Xu & Shijie Dong, 2018. "A New Integration System for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants with CO 2 Capture and Heat Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Hung, T.C. & Shai, T.Y. & Wang, S.K., 1997. "A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 661-667.
    4. Wang, Dexin & Bao, Ainan & Kunc, Walter & Liss, William, 2012. "Coal power plant flue gas waste heat and water recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 341-348.
    5. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    6. Xu, Gang & Huang, Shengwei & Yang, Yongping & Wu, Ying & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Cheng, 2013. "Techno-economic analysis and optimization of the heat recovery of utility boiler flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 907-917.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Haichao & Wu, Xiaozhou & Liu, Zheyi & Granlund, Katja & Lahdelma, Risto & Li, Ji & Teppo, Esa & Yu, Li & Duamu, Lin & Li, Xiangli & Haavisto, Ilkka, 2021. "Waste heat recovery mechanism for coal-fired flue gas in a counter-flow direct contact scrubber," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Artur J. Jaworski, 2019. "Special Issue “Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-4, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jianhua & Zhou, Yeli & Li, Ying & Hou, Guolian & Fang, Fang, 2013. "Generalized predictive control applied in waste heat recovery power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 320-326.
    2. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    3. Ma, Youfu & Wang, Zirui & Lu, Junfu & Yang, Lijuan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a novel hot air recirculation process for exhaust heat recovery from a 600 MW brown-coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 348-357.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    5. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    6. Sung, Taehong & Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Hyun Dong & Yoon, Sang Youl & Choi, Bum Seog & Kim, Kuisoon & Kim, Jangmok & Jung, Yang Beom & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2016. "Performance characteristics of a 200-kW organic Rankine cycle system in a steel processing plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 623-635.
    7. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Shalaby, S.M., 2017. "Reverse osmosis desalination powered by photovoltaic and solar Rankine cycle power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 789-797.
    9. Rongrong Zhai & Hongtao Liu & Hao Wu & Hai Yu & Yongping Yang, 2018. "Analysis of Integration of MEA-Based CO 2 Capture and Solar Energy System for Coal-Based Power Plants Based on Thermo-Economic Structural Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, May.
    10. Chang, C.T. & Costa, M. & La Villetta, M. & Macaluso, A. & Piazzullo, D. & Vanoli, L., 2019. "Thermo-economic analyses of a Taiwanese combined CHP system fuelled with syngas from rice husk gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 766-780.
    11. Shao, Long & Ma, Xinling & Wei, Xinli & Hou, Zhonglan & Meng, Xiangrui, 2017. "Design and experimental study of a small-sized organic Rankine cycle system under various cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 236-245.
    12. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    13. F. Tchanche, Bertrand & Pétrissans, M. & Papadakis, G., 2014. "Heat resources and organic Rankine cycle machines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1185-1199.
    14. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    15. Jianhua Zhang & Jiancun Feng & Yeli Zhou & Fang Fang & Hong Yue, 2012. "Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Waste Heat Recovery Systems with Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Benato, A. & Kærn, M.R. & Pierobon, L. & Stoppato, A. & Haglind, F., 2015. "Analysis of hot spots in boilers of organic Rankine cycle units during transient operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 119-131.
    17. Ma, Hongqiang & Liang, Nuo & Liu, Yemin & Luo, Xinmei & Hou, Caiqin & Wang, Gang, 2021. "Experimental study on novel waste heat recovery system for sulfide-containing flue gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    19. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    20. Wang, Dongxiang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Liu, Lin & Tao, LanLan, 2013. "Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 343-352.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1585-:d:226044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.