IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i3p453-d202302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature Selection Algorithms for Wind Turbine Failure Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Pere Marti-Puig

    (Data and Signal Processing Group, University of Vic—Central University of Catalonia, c/ de la Laura 13, 08500 Vic, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Alejandro Blanco-M

    (Data and Signal Processing Group, University of Vic—Central University of Catalonia, c/ de la Laura 13, 08500 Vic, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Juan José Cárdenas

    (Smartive-ITESTIT SL, Carretera BV-1274, Km1, 08225 Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Jordi Cusidó

    (Smartive-ITESTIT SL, Carretera BV-1274, Km1, 08225 Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Jordi Solé-Casals

    (Data and Signal Processing Group, University of Vic—Central University of Catalonia, c/ de la Laura 13, 08500 Vic, Catalonia, Spain)

Abstract

It is well known that each year the wind sector has profit losses due to wind turbine failures and operation and maintenance costs. Therefore, operations related to these actions are crucial for wind farm operators and linked companies. One of the key points for failure prediction on wind turbine using SCADA data is to select the optimal or near optimal set of inputs that can feed the failure prediction (prognosis) algorithm. Due to a high number of possible predictors (from tens to hundreds), the optimal set of inputs obtained by exhaustive-search algorithms is not viable in the majority of cases. In order to tackle this issue, show the viability of prognosis and select the best set of variables from more than 200 analogous variables recorded at intervals of 5 or 10 min by the wind farm’s SCADA, in this paper a thorough study of automatic input selection algorithms for wind turbine failure prediction is presented and an exhaustive-search-based quasi-optimal (QO) algorithm, which has been used as a reference, is proposed. In order to evaluate the performance, a k -NN classification algorithm is used. Results showed that the best automatic feature selection method in our case-study is the conditional mutual information (CMI), while the worst one is the mutual information feature selection (MIFS). Furthermore, the effect of the number of neighbours ( k ) is tested. Experiments demonstrate that k = 1 is the best option if the number of features is higher than 3. The experiments carried out in this work have been extracted from measures taken along an entire year and corresponding to gearbox and transmission systems of Fuhrländer wind turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Pere Marti-Puig & Alejandro Blanco-M & Juan José Cárdenas & Jordi Cusidó & Jordi Solé-Casals, 2019. "Feature Selection Algorithms for Wind Turbine Failure Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:453-:d:202302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/453/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/453/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Astolfi, Davide & Castellani, Francesco & Garinei, Alberto & Terzi, Ludovico, 2015. "Data mining techniques for performance analysis of onshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 220-233.
    2. Marvuglia, Antonino & Messineo, Antonio, 2012. "Monitoring of wind farms’ power curves using machine learning techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 574-583.
    3. Peter Hall & Richard J. Samworth, 2005. "Properties of bagged nearest neighbour classifiers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 363-379, June.
    4. Peyman Mazidi & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "Wind turbine prognostics and maintenance management based on a hybrid approach of neural networks and a proportional hazards model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 121-129, April.
    5. Yolanda Vidal & Francesc Pozo & Christian Tutivén, 2018. "Wind Turbine Multi-Fault Detection and Classification Based on SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Liu, Hui & Tian, Hong-qi & Liang, Xi-feng & Li, Yan-fei, 2015. "Wind speed forecasting approach using secondary decomposition algorithm and Elman neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 183-194.
    7. Yingying Zhao & Dongsheng Li & Ao Dong & Dahai Kang & Qin Lv & Li Shang, 2017. "Fault Prediction and Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Generators Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Kevin Leahy & Colm Gallagher & Peter O’Donovan & Ken Bruton & Dominic T. J. O’Sullivan, 2018. "A Robust Prescriptive Framework and Performance Metric for Diagnosing and Predicting Wind Turbine Faults Based on SCADA and Alarms Data with Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Kusiak, Andrew & Li, Wenyan, 2011. "The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 16-23.
    10. Hameed, Z. & Hong, Y.S. & Cho, Y.M. & Ahn, S.H. & Song, C.K., 2009. "Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-39, January.
    11. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew Mark & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2012. "Condition monitoring of wind turbines: Techniques and methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 169-178.
    12. Alejandro Blanco-M. & Karina Gibert & Pere Marti-Puig & Jordi Cusidó & Jordi Solé-Casals, 2018. "Identifying Health Status of Wind Turbines by Using Self Organizing Maps and Interpretation-Oriented Post-Processing Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Dong & Jianmin Liu & Yanbin Liu & Xinyong Qiao & Xiaoming Zhang & Ying Jin & Shaoliang Zhang & Tianqi Wang & Qi Kang, 2020. "A RBFNN & GACMOO-Based Working State Optimization Control Study on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Working in Plateau Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Jianjun Qin & Michael Havbro Faber, 2019. "Resilience Informed Integrity Management of Wind Turbine Parks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Camila Correa-Jullian & Sergio Cofre-Martel & Gabriel San Martin & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Gustavo de Novaes Pires Leite & Alexandre Costa, 2022. "Exploring Quantum Machine Learning and Feature Reduction Techniques for Wind Turbine Pitch Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Kerman López de Calle & Susana Ferreiro & Constantino Roldán-Paraponiaris & Alain Ulazia, 2019. "A Context-Aware Oil Debris-Based Health Indicator for Wind Turbine Gearbox Condition Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Ayman A. Aly & Bassem F. Felemban & Ardashir Mohammadzadeh & Oscar Castillo & Andrzej Bartoszewicz, 2021. "Frequency Regulation System: A Deep Learning Identification, Type-3 Fuzzy Control and LMI Stability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Yolanda Vidal, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-4, February.
    7. Mengmeng Wang & Quanbo Ge & Haoyu Jiang & Gang Yao, 2019. "Wear Fault Diagnosis of Aeroengines Based on Broad Learning System and Ensemble Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Bilateral Gaussian Wake Model Formulation for Wind Farms: A Forecasting based approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Silvio Simani & Saverio Farsoni & Paolo Castaldi, 2023. "RETRACTED: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition for Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbines via Deep Transfer Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Urmeneta, Jon & Izquierdo, Juan & Leturiondo, Urko, 2023. "A methodology for performance assessment at system level—Identification of operating regimes and anomaly detection in wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 281-292.
    11. Jorge Maldonado-Correa & Sergio Martín-Martínez & Estefanía Artigao & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2020. "Using SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Imre Delgado & Muhammad Fahim, 2020. "Wind Turbine Data Analysis and LSTM-Based Prediction in SCADA System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yanting & Liu, Shujun & Shu, Lianjie, 2019. "Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on Gaussian process classifiers applied to operational data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 357-366.
    2. Jorge Maldonado-Correa & Sergio Martín-Martínez & Estefanía Artigao & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2020. "Using SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Francisco Bilendo & Angela Meyer & Hamed Badihi & Ningyun Lu & Philippe Cambron & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Applications and Modeling Techniques of Wind Turbine Power Curve for Wind Farms—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, December.
    4. Sun, Peng & Li, Jian & Wang, Caisheng & Lei, Xiao, 2016. "A generalized model for wind turbine anomaly identification based on SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 550-567.
    5. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    6. Camila Correa-Jullian & Sergio Cofre-Martel & Gabriel San Martin & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Gustavo de Novaes Pires Leite & Alexandre Costa, 2022. "Exploring Quantum Machine Learning and Feature Reduction Techniques for Wind Turbine Pitch Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Jin, Xin & Ju, Wenbin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Guo, Lianxin & Yang, Xiangang, 2016. "System safety analysis of large wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1293-1307.
    8. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    9. Phong B. Dao, 2021. "A CUSUM-Based Approach for Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Kevin Leahy & Colm Gallagher & Peter O’Donovan & Ken Bruton & Dominic T. J. O’Sullivan, 2018. "A Robust Prescriptive Framework and Performance Metric for Diagnosing and Predicting Wind Turbine Faults Based on SCADA and Alarms Data with Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Rodríguez-López, Miguel A. & López-González, Luis M. & López-Ochoa, Luis M. & Las-Heras-Casas, Jesús, 2016. "Development of indicators for the detection of equipment malfunctions and degradation estimation based on digital signals (alarms and events) from operation SCADA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 224-236.
    12. Ana Rita Nunes & Hugo Morais & Alberto Sardinha, 2021. "Use of Learning Mechanisms to Improve the Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Generators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    14. Marugán, Alberto Pliego & Márquez, Fausto Pedro García & Perez, Jesus María Pinar & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego, 2018. "A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1822-1836.
    15. Dao, Phong B., 2022. "Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on structural break detection in SCADA data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 641-654.
    16. Igba, Joel & Alemzadeh, Kazem & Durugbo, Christopher & Henningsen, Keld, 2015. "Performance assessment of wind turbine gearboxes using in-service data: Current approaches and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 144-159.
    17. Cambron, P. & Lepvrier, R. & Masson, C. & Tahan, A. & Pelletier, F., 2016. "Power curve monitoring using weighted moving average control charts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 126-135.
    18. Kevin Leahy & Colm Gallagher & Peter O’Donovan & Dominic T. J. O’Sullivan, 2019. "Issues with Data Quality for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Reliability Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Mérigaud, Alexis & Ringwood, John V., 2016. "Condition-based maintenance methods for marine renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-78.
    20. Fallahi, F. & Bakir, I. & Yildirim, M. & Ye, Z., 2022. "A chance-constrained optimization framework for wind farms to manage fleet-level availability in condition based maintenance and operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:453-:d:202302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.