IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3526-d267052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Substrate–Enzyme Proportion for Efficient Hydrolysis of Hay

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Mezule

    (Water Research Laboratory, Riga Technical University, P. Valdena 1-303 Riga, Latvia)

  • Ieva Berzina

    (Water Research Laboratory, Riga Technical University, P. Valdena 1-303 Riga, Latvia)

  • Martins Strods

    (Water Research Laboratory, Riga Technical University, P. Valdena 1-303 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

Fuel alcohol production yields can be influenced by lignocellulosic biomass loading. High solid loadings (>20 wt%) are suggested to have the potential to produce more products. However, most often, low substrate loadings (<5% solids, w/w ) are used to ensure good wetting and enzyme accessibility, and to minimize any inhibitory effect on the hydrolysis products. Here, we analyzed the effect of substrate loading on the enzymatic hydrolysis of hay with non-commercial enzyme products obtained from white-rot fungi. A significant negative effect on hydrolysis was observed when 10 wt% hay loading was used with the commercial enzyme, however, non-commercial enzyme products from white-rot fungi had no impact on hydrolysis in biomass loading rates from 1 to 10 wt%. Moreover, it was estimated that enzymes extracted from white-rot fungi could be used at a concentration of 0.2 FPU/mL at a biomass loading from 1–10 wt%, resulting in 0.17–0.24 g of released reducing carbohydrates per gram of biomass. Higher concentrations did not result in any significant conversion increase. A mixing impact was only observed in test runs at a substrate loading of 10 wt%. The apparently positive features of the non-commercial enzyme mixes give rise to their future use. The combination and upgrade of existing technologies, e.g., efficient pre-treatment, membrane purification, and concentration and efficient product recovery, should result in even higher conversion yields.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Mezule & Ieva Berzina & Martins Strods, 2019. "The Impact of Substrate–Enzyme Proportion for Efficient Hydrolysis of Hay," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3526-:d:267052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghosh, Shiladitya & Chowdhury, Ranjana & Bhattacharya, Pinaki, 2017. "Sustainability of cereal straws for the fermentative production of second generation biofuels: A review of the efficiency and economics of biochemical pretreatment processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 284-298.
    2. French, Katherine E., 2019. "Assessing the bioenergy potential of grassland biomass from conservation areas in England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 700-708.
    3. Monforti, F. & Lugato, E. & Motola, V. & Bodis, K. & Scarlat, N. & Dallemand, J.-F., 2015. "Optimal energy use of agricultural crop residues preserving soil organic carbon stocks in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 519-529.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda Mezule & Baiba Strazdina & Brigita Dalecka & Eriks Skripsts & Talis Juhna, 2021. "Natural Grasslands as Lignocellulosic Biofuel Resources: Factors Affecting Fermentable Sugar Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwon, Oseok & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Waste-to-bioethanol supply chain network: A deterministic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2024. "The interplay between bioeconomy and the maintenance of long-term soil organic carbon stock in agricultural soils: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    5. Li, Hengxiang & Zhang, Kang & Zhang, Xiaohua & Cao, Qing & Jin, Li'e, 2018. "Contributions of ultrasonic wave, metal ions, and oxidation on the depolymerization of cellulose and its kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 699-707.
    6. Mattias, Gaglio & Elena, Tamburini & Giuseppe, Castaldelli & Anna, Fano Elisa, 2021. "Modeling the ecosystem service of agricultural residues provision for bioenergy production: A potential application in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 451(C).
    7. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    8. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Gérard, Maxence & Jayet, Pierre-Alain, 2023. "European farmers’ response to crop residue prices and implications for bioenergy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Mizik, Tamás, 2022. "A bioetanol-termelés gazdasági és fenntarthatósági vetületei [Economic and sustainability aspects of bioethanol production]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1213-1241.
    11. Du, Jiliang & Chen, Le & Li, Jianan & Zuo, Ranan & Yang, Xiushan & Chen, Hongzhang & Zhuang, Xinshu & Tian, Shen, 2018. "High-solids ethanol fermentation with single-stage methane anaerobic digestion for maximizing bioenergy conversion from a C4 grass (Pennisetum purpereum)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 437-443.
    12. Kluts, Ingeborg & Wicke, Birka & Leemans, Rik & Faaij, André, 2017. "Sustainability constraints in determining European bioenergy potential: A review of existing studies and steps forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 719-734.
    13. Scarlat, Nicolae & Fahl, Fernando & Dallemand, Jean-François & Monforti, Fabio & Motola, Vicenzo, 2018. "A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 915-930.
    14. Ogechukwu Bose Chukwuma & Mohd Rafatullah & Husnul Azan Tajarudin & Norli Ismail, 2021. "A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Song, Junnian & Yang, Wei & Higano, Yoshiro & Wang, Xian’en, 2015. "Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues: An input–output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 178-189.
    16. Cai, Mengfan & An, Chunjiang & Guy, Christophe, 2021. "A scientometric analysis and review of biogenic volatile organic compound emissions: Research hotspots, new frontiers, and environmental implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Clivot, Hugues & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2023. "The crop residue conundrum: Maintaining long-term soil organic carbon stocks while reinforcing the bioeconomy, compatible endeavors?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    19. Zhang, Jixiang & Li, Jun & Dong, Changqing & Zhang, Xiaolei & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Shen, Delong, 2021. "Comprehensive assessment of sustainable potential of agricultural residues for bioenergy based on geographical information system: A case study of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 466-478.
    20. Herr, Alexander & Braid, Andrew & Carter, John & McIvor, John & Murphy, Helen T & O’Connell, Deborah & Raisbeck-Brown, Nat & Poole, Michael, 2016. "Cut your grass and eat it too– Is aviation biofuel production and grazing in the Australian tropics possible?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1377-1388.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3526-:d:267052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.