IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i17p3260-d260536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving Scheduling Problem in a Distributed Manufacturing System Using a Discrete Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohui Zhang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xinhua Liu

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shufeng Tang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China)

  • Grzegorz Królczyk

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Automation Products, Opole University of Technology, 45758 Opole, Poland)

  • Zhixiong Li

    (Suzhou Automotive Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Suzhou 215134, China
    School of Mechanical, Materials, Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

Abstract

This study attempts to optimize the scheduling decision to save production cost (e.g., energy consumption) in a distributed manufacturing environment that comprises multiple distributed factories and where each factory has one flow shop with blocking constraints. A new scheduling optimization model is developed based on a discrete fruit fly optimization algorithm (DFOA). In this new evolutionary optimization method, three heuristic methods were proposed to initialize the DFOA model with good quality and diversity. In the smell-based search phase of DFOA, four neighborhood structures according to factory reassignment and job sequencing adjustment were designed to help explore a larger solution space. Furthermore, two local search methods were incorporated into the framework of variable neighborhood descent (VND) to enhance exploitation. In the vision-based search phase, an effective update criterion was developed. Hence, the proposed DFOA has a large probability to find an optimal solution to the scheduling optimization problem. Experimental validation was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed initialization schemes, neighborhood strategy, and local search methods. Additionally, the proposed DFOA was compared with well-known heuristics and metaheuristics on small-scale and large-scale test instances. The analysis results demonstrate that the search and optimization ability of the proposed DFOA is superior to well-known algorithms on precision and convergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohui Zhang & Xinhua Liu & Shufeng Tang & Grzegorz Królczyk & Zhixiong Li, 2019. "Solving Scheduling Problem in a Distributed Manufacturing System Using a Discrete Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3260-:d:260536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuyan Han & Dunwei Gong & Junqing Li & Yong Zhang, 2016. "Solving the blocking flow shop scheduling problem with makespan using a modified fruit fly optimisation algorithm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(22), pages 6782-6797, November.
    2. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    3. Naderi, Bahman & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "A scatter search algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 323-334.
    4. Victor Fernandez-Viagas & Jose M. Framinan, 2015. "A bounded-search iterated greedy algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 1111-1123, February.
    5. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    6. Marcelo Seido Nagano & Adriano Seiko Komesu & Hugo Hissashi Miyata, 2019. "An evolutionary clustering search for the total tardiness blocking flow shop problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1843-1857, April.
    7. Caraffa, Vince & Ianes, Stefano & P. Bagchi, Tapan & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2001. "Minimizing makespan in a blocking flowshop using genetic algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 101-115, March.
    8. Ribas, Imma & Companys, Ramon & Tort-Martorell, Xavier, 2011. "An iterated greedy algorithm for the flowshop scheduling problem with blocking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 293-301, June.
    9. Taillard, E., 1993. "Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 278-285, January.
    10. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    11. Grabowski, Jøzef & Pempera, Jaroslaw, 2007. "The permutation flow shop problem with blocking. A tabu search approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 302-311, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veera Babu Ramakurthi & Vijaya Kumar Manupati & Leonilde Varela & Goran Putnik, 2023. "Leveraging Blockchain to Support Collaborative Distributed Manufacturing Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Maksim Dli & Andrei Puchkov & Valery Meshalkin & Ildar Abdeev & Rail Saitov & Rinat Abdeev, 2020. "Energy and Resource Efficiency in Apatite-Nepheline Ore Waste Processing Using the Digital Twin Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Yan Wang & Congxianzi Pei & Qiushuo Li & Jingbang Li & Deng Pan & Ciwei Gao, 2020. "Flow Shop Providing Frequency Regulation Service in Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Marcelo Seido Nagano & Adriano Seiko Komesu & Hugo Hissashi Miyata, 2019. "An evolutionary clustering search for the total tardiness blocking flow shop problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1843-1857, April.
    3. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2013. "Minimizing makespan in a blocking flowshop using a revised artificial immune system algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 383-389.
    4. Joaquín Bautista-Valhondo & Rocío Alfaro-Pozo, 2020. "Mixed integer linear programming models for Flow Shop Scheduling with a demand plan of job types," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 5-23, March.
    5. Pan, Quan-Ke & Wang, Ling, 2012. "Effective heuristics for the blocking flowshop scheduling problem with makespan minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 218-229, April.
    6. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    7. Nouha Nouri & Talel Ladhari, 2018. "Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for the multi-machine flow shop scheduling problem under blocking," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 413-430, August.
    8. Ronconi, Débora P. & Henriques, Luís R.S., 2009. "Some heuristic algorithms for total tardiness minimization in a flowshop with blocking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 272-281, April.
    9. Arshad Ali & Yuvraj Gajpal & Tarek Y. Elmekkawy, 2021. "Distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem with total completion time objective," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(2), pages 425-447, June.
    10. He, Xuan & Pan, Quan-Ke & Gao, Liang & Neufeld, Janis S. & Gupta, Jatinder N.D., 2024. "Historical information based iterated greedy algorithm for distributed flowshop group scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Liu, Shi Qiang & Kozan, Erhan, 2009. "Scheduling a flow shop with combined buffer conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 371-380, February.
    12. Ribas, Imma & Companys, Ramon & Tort-Martorell, Xavier, 2011. "An iterated greedy algorithm for the flowshop scheduling problem with blocking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 293-301, June.
    13. Chenyao Zhang & Yuyan Han & Yuting Wang & Junqing Li & Kaizhou Gao, 2023. "A Distributed Blocking Flowshop Scheduling with Setup Times Using Multi-Factory Collaboration Iterated Greedy Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Donald Davendra & Ivan Zelinka & Magdalena Bialic-Davendra & Roman Senkerik & Roman Jasek, 2012. "Clustered enhanced differential evolution for the blocking flow shop scheduling problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(4), pages 679-717, December.
    15. Li, Xiaoping & Wang, Qian & Wu, Cheng, 2009. "Efficient composite heuristics for total flowtime minimization in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 155-164, February.
    16. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    17. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    18. Xiong, Fuli & Xing, Keyi & Wang, Feng, 2015. "Scheduling a hybrid assembly-differentiation flowshop to minimize total flow time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 338-354.
    19. Grabowski, Jøzef & Pempera, Jaroslaw, 2007. "The permutation flow shop problem with blocking. A tabu search approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 302-311, June.
    20. Ansis Ozolins, 2019. "Improved bounded dynamic programming algorithm for solving the blocking flow shop problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 15-38, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3260-:d:260536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.