IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i16p3176-d258874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Design Optimization Using an Improved Jaya Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Uday K. Chakraborty

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA)

Abstract

Fuel cell stack configuration optimization is known to be a problem that, in addition to presenting engineering challenges, is computationally hard. This paper presents an improved computational heuristic for solving the problem. The problem addressed in this paper is one of constrained optimization, where the goal is to seek optimal (or near-optimal) values of (i) the number of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) to be connected in series to form a group, (ii) the number of such groups to be connected in parallel, and (iii) the cell area, such that the PEMFC assembly delivers the rated voltage at the rated power while the cost of building the assembly is as low as possible. Simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms four of the best-known methods in the literature. The improvement in performance afforded by the proposed algorithm is validated with statistical tests of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Uday K. Chakraborty, 2019. "Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Design Optimization Using an Improved Jaya Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:16:p:3176-:d:258874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/16/3176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/16/3176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chakraborty, Uday Kumar, 2009. "Static and dynamic modeling of solid oxide fuel cell using genetic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 740-751.
    2. Gregory D. Merkel & Richard J. Povinelli & Ronald H. Brown, 2018. "Short-Term Load Forecasting of Natural Gas with Deep Neural Network Regression †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Chakraborty, Uday K. & Abbott, Travis E. & Das, Sajal K., 2012. "PEM fuel cell modeling using differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 387-399.
    4. Besseris, George J., 2014. "Using qualimetric engineering and extremal analysis to optimize a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 15-26.
    5. Chakraborty, Uttara, 2016. "Fuel crossover and internal current in proton exchange membrane fuel cell modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 60-62.
    6. Julian Kates-Harbeck & Alexey Svyatkovskiy & William Tang, 2019. "Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7753), pages 526-531, April.
    7. Uday K. Chakraborty, 2018. "Reversible and Irreversible Potentials and an Inaccuracy in Popular Models in the Fuel Cell Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Ocłoń & Maciej Ławryńczuk & Marek Czamara, 2021. "A New Solar Assisted Heat Pump System with Underground Energy Storage: Modelling and Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Walter Zamboni & Giovanni Petrone & Giovanni Spagnuolo & Davide Beretta, 2019. "An Evolutionary Computation Approach for the Online/On-Board Identification of PEM Fuel Cell Impedance Parameters with A Diagnostic Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Behzad Najafi & Paolo Bonomi & Andrea Casalegno & Fabio Rinaldi & Andrea Baricci, 2020. "Rapid Fault Diagnosis of PEM Fuel Cells through Optimal Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uday K. Chakraborty, 2018. "Reversible and Irreversible Potentials and an Inaccuracy in Popular Models in the Fuel Cell Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Henry Miniguano & Andrés Barrado & Cristina Fernández & Pablo Zumel & Antonio Lázaro, 2019. "A General Parameter Identification Procedure Used for the Comparative Study of Supercapacitors Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Banaja Mohanty & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Hany M. Hasanien & Elangovan Devaraj & Rania A. Turky & Rishi Pugazhendhi, 2022. "Parameters Identification of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Model Based on the Lightning Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Zhu, Li & Chen, Junghui, 2018. "Prognostics of PEM fuel cells based on Gaussian process state space models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 63-73.
    5. Arne L. Lazar & Swantje C. Konradt & Hermann Rottengruber, 2019. "Open-Source Dynamic Matlab/Simulink 1D Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Puja Bhatt & Neha Agarwal & Uday K. Chakraborty, 2016. "Parameter Optimization of PEMFC with Genetic Algorithm," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 241-249, November.
    7. El-Hay, E.A. & El-Hameed, M.A. & El-Fergany, A.A., 2019. "Optimized Parameters of SOFC for steady state and transient simulations using interior search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 451-461.
    8. Xu, Liangfei & Fang, Chuan & Li, Jianqiu & Ouyang, Minggao & Lehnert, Werner, 2018. "Nonlinear dynamic mechanism modeling of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with dead-ended anode considering mass transport and actuator properties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 106-121.
    9. Tobias Thomas & Dominik Straub & Fabian Tatai & Megan Shene & Tümer Tosik & Kristian Kersting & Constantin A. Rothkopf, 2024. "Modelling dataset bias in machine-learned theories of economic decision-making," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 679-691, April.
    10. Fofana, Daouda & Natarajan, Sadesh Kumar & Hamelin, Jean & Benard, Pierre, 2014. "Low platinum, high limiting current density of the PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) based on multilayer cathode catalyst approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 398-403.
    11. Sharifi Asl, S.M. & Rowshanzamir, S. & Eikani, M.H., 2010. "Modelling and simulation of the steady-state and dynamic behaviour of a PEM fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1633-1646.
    12. Pei, Pucheng & Wu, Ziyao & Li, Yuehua & Jia, Xiaoning & Chen, Dongfang & Huang, Shangwei, 2018. "Improved methods to measure hydrogen crossover current in proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 338-347.
    13. Sun, Zhe & Wang, Ning & Bi, Yunrui & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2015. "Parameter identification of PEMFC model based on hybrid adaptive differential evolution algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1334-1341.
    14. Vitayasak, Srisatja & Pongcharoen, Pupong & Hicks, Chris, 2017. "A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified Backtracking Search Algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 146-157.
    15. Chakraborty, Uday Kumar, 2011. "An error in solid oxide fuel cell stack modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 801-802.
    16. Chakraborty, Uday K. & Abbott, Travis E. & Das, Sajal K., 2012. "PEM fuel cell modeling using differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 387-399.
    17. Xu, Shuhui & Wang, Yong & Wang, Zhi, 2019. "Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder-Mead simplex method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 457-467.
    18. Priya, K. & Sathishkumar, K. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "A comprehensive review on parameter estimation techniques for Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 121-144.
    19. Andrea Murari & Riccardo Rossi & Teddy Craciunescu & Jesús Vega & Michela Gelfusa, 2024. "A control oriented strategy of disruption prediction to avoid the configuration collapse of tokamak reactors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Hegazy Rezk & Rania M. Ghoniem & Seydali Ferahtia & Ahmed Fathy & Mohamed M. Ghoniem & Reem Alkanhel, 2022. "A Comparison of Different Renewable-Based DC Microgrid Energy Management Strategies for Commercial Buildings Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:16:p:3176-:d:258874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.