IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i14p2688-d247968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voltage Stability Index Calculation by Hybrid State Estimation Based on Multi Objective Optimal Phasor Measurement Unit Placement

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshiaki Matsukawa

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 804-8550, Japan)

  • Masayuki Watanabe

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 804-8550, Japan)

  • Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab

    (Advanced Lightning and Power Energy Research (ALPER), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Lutfi Othman

    (Advanced Lightning and Power Energy Research (ALPER), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia)

Abstract

Operation of a power system close to the voltage stability limit due to increasing of load demand and limited power sources may result in disastrous economic loss with voltage collapse of the entire power system. A system operator has to understand how far the system is from the critical boundary of the voltage collapse. This paper investigated the influence of State Estimation (SE) in the calculation of the Critical Boundary Index (CBI) as a voltage stability index. For SE, Hybrid State Estimation (HSE), including the measurement set of both Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU), is employed. Concurrently, the CBI is estimated using voltage phasor estimated by HSE based on optimal PMU location, which is selected from a Pareto optimal front obtained by the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). As a result of CBI estimation, HSE using PMU is relatively accurate in voltage stability index estimation compared to SCADA SE, which uses the RTU alone. However, when a mixed measurement condition in some lines affects the CBI estimation, it is suggested that it may be necessary to discard PMU measurements in some cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshiaki Matsukawa & Masayuki Watanabe & Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2019. "Voltage Stability Index Calculation by Hybrid State Estimation Based on Multi Objective Optimal Phasor Measurement Unit Placement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2688-:d:247968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2688/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2688/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Modarresi, Javad & Gholipour, Eskandar & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2016. "A comprehensive review of the voltage stability indices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharmistha Nandi & Sriparna Roy Ghatak & Parimal Acharjee & Fernando Lopes, 2023. "Non-Iterative, Unique, and Logical Formula-Based Technique to Determine Maximum Load Multiplier and Practical Load Multiplier for Both Transmission and Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. M. Rambabu & G. V. Nagesh Kumar & S. Sivanagaraju, 2019. "Optimal Power Flow of Integrated Renewable Energy System using a Thyristor Controlled SeriesCompensator and a Grey-Wolf Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Veerasamy, Veerapandiyan & Abdul Wahab, Noor Izzri & Ramachandran, Rajeswari & Othman, Mohammad Lutfi & Hizam, Hashim & Devendran, Vidhya Sagar & Irudayaraj, Andrew Xavier Raj & Vinayagam, Arangarajan, 2021. "Recurrent network based power flow solution for voltage stability assessment and improvement with distributed energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    4. Yude Yang & Jingru Long & Lizhen Yang & Shuqin Mo & Xuesong Wu, 2024. "Correction Control Model of L-Index Based on VSC-OPF and BLS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Van Duong Ngo & Dinh Duong Le & Kim Hung Le & Van Kien Pham & Alberto Berizzi, 2017. "A Methodology for Determining Permissible Operating Region of Power Systems According to Conditions of Static Stability Limit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdul Kashif Janjua & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2018. "Enhanced Voltage Stability Assessment Index Based Planning Approach for Mesh Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Riyadh Kamil Chillab & Aqeel S. Jaber & Mouna Ben Smida & Anis Sakly, 2023. "Optimal DG Location and Sizing to Minimize Losses and Improve Voltage Profile Using Garra Rufa Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Mohammed Amroune & Ismail Musirin & Tarek Bouktir & Muhammad Murtadha Othman, 2017. "The Amalgamation of SVR and ANFIS Models with Synchronized Phasor Measurements for On-Line Voltage Stability Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Teketay Mulu Beza & Yen-Chih Huang & Cheng-Chien Kuo, 2020. "A Hybrid Optimization Approach for Power Loss Reduction and DG Penetration Level Increment in Electrical Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Eshan Karunarathne & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Janaka Ekanayake & Dilini Almeida, 2021. "The Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation in an Active Distribution Network with Several Soft Open Points," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Kabulo Loji & Sachin Sharma & Nomhle Loji & Gulshan Sharma & Pitshou N. Bokoro, 2023. "Operational Issues of Contemporary Distribution Systems: A Review on Recent and Emerging Concerns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Usama Ameer Khan & Waleed Ahmad & Muhammad Hassan & Fahim Ahmed Ibupoto & Syed Basit Ali Bukhari & Sajid Ali & M. Mahad Malik & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2021. "Multiple (TEES)-Criteria-Based Sustainable Planning Approach for Mesh-Configured Distribution Mechanisms across Multiple Load Growth Horizons," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-44, May.
    13. Chandu Valuva & Subramani Chinnamuthu & Tahir Khurshaid & Ki-Chai Kim, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on the Modelling and Significance of Stability Indices in Power System Instability Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-45, September.
    14. Xiaoming Mao & Junxian Chen, 2019. "A Fast Method to Compute the Dynamic Response of Induction Motor Loads Considering the Negative-Sequence Components in Stability Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Eshan Karunarathne & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Janaka Ekanayake & Dilini Almeida, 2020. "Optimal Placement and Sizing of DGs in Distribution Networks Using MLPSO Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    16. Gasperic, Samo & Mihalic, Rafael, 2019. "Estimation of the efficiency of FACTS devices for voltage-stability enhancement with PV area criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 144-156.
    17. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2017. "DG Placement in Loop Distribution Network with New Voltage Stability Index and Loss Minimization Condition Based Planning Approach under Load Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Hafiz Waleed Ahmad & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2019. "A New Improved Voltage Stability Assessment Index-centered Integrated Planning Approach for Multiple Asset Placement in Mesh Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-41, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2688-:d:247968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.