IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i10p2026-d234638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamental Investigation of the Effects of Modified Starch, Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, and Xanthan Gum on Hydrate Formation under Different Driving Forces

Author

Listed:
  • Ren Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China
    CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company limited, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Huicui Sun

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xiaomei Shi

    (CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company limited, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xianguang Xu

    (CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company limited, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Ling Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhilei Zhang

    (CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company limited, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The development of a new drilling fluid system with hydrate inhibition is of great significance for drilling safety in gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Considering the importance of the selection of a suitable thickener for drilling fluid systems under weak and strong driving forces, the hydrate inhibition of 0.1–0.5 wt% modified starch (MS), carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC), and xanthan gum (XG) aqueous solutions was studied. The applicability of these three thickeners were investigated through hydrate formation experiments, mesostructure observations, water activity tests, bubble retention observations, and rheological property tests. The results show that (1) under weak driving force, 0.3 wt% or higher concentration CMC and 0.3 wt% XG can almost completely inhibit hydrate formation due to the interactions between relatively small amounts of free water and CH 4 molecules. Furthermore, the hydrate inhibition of higher XG concentrations was decreased due to their strong foam stability, leading to good contact between free water and CH 4 molecules. Meanwhile, the hydrate inhibition of MS was weaker when compared with that of CMC and XG at the same concentrations. (2) Under strong driving force, the existence of the three 0.1–0.5 wt% thickeners could only slow down the hydrate formation rate, and hydrate inhibition due to XG was slightly better than that of the other two. This result implies that the effects of the different mesostructures on hydrate formation were severely weakened. Finally, (3) the tackifying effect of CMC was found to be stronger than that of XG and MS, and the rheological properties of the CMC solution were shown to be relatively weak compared to those of the XG and MS solutions; the CMC solution showed a more significant increase in viscosity with decreasing temperature, which is related to the differences in the mesostructures. Therefore, when the driving force of hydrate formation is relatively low, CMC is a good choice for the drilling fluid system when there is no requirement for cooling, while XG is more applicable for a system that needs cooling. In the case of a stronger driving force, XG is the optimal choice irrespective of whether the drilling fluid system needs cooling or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren Wang & Huicui Sun & Xiaomei Shi & Xianguang Xu & Ling Zhang & Zhilei Zhang, 2019. "Fundamental Investigation of the Effects of Modified Starch, Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, and Xanthan Gum on Hydrate Formation under Different Driving Forces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:2026-:d:234638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/2026/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/2026/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Dendy Sloan, 2003. "Fundamental principles and applications of natural gas hydrates," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6964), pages 353-359, November.
    2. Feng, Jing-Chun & Wang, Yi & Li, Xiao-Sen, 2018. "Dissociation characteristics of water-saturated methane hydrate induced by huff and puff method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1171-1178.
    3. Guosheng Jiang & Tianle Liu & Fulong Ning & Yunzhong Tu & Ling Zhang & Yibing Yu & Lixin Kuang, 2011. "Polyethylene Glycol Drilling Fluid for Drilling in Marine Gas Hydrates-Bearing Sediments: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan, Qing-Cui & Si, Hu & Li, Gang & Feng, Jing-Chun & Li, Bo, 2020. "Heterogeneity properties of methane hydrate formation in a pilot-scale hydrate simulator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Nair, Vishnu Chandrasekharan & Prasad, Siddhant Kumar & Kumar, Rajnish & Sangwai, Jitendra S., 2018. "Energy recovery from simulated clayey gas hydrate reservoir using depressurization by constant rate gas release, thermal stimulation and their combinations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 755-768.
    3. Chen, Xuyue & Yang, Jin & Gao, Deli & Hong, Yuqun & Zou, Yiqi & Du, Xu, 2020. "Unlocking the deepwater natural gas hydrate's commercial potential with extended reach wells from shallow water: Review and an innovative method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Lei, Gang & Tang, Jiadi & Zhang, Ling & Wu, Qi & Li, Jun, 2024. "Effective thermal conductivity for hydrate-bearing sediments under stress and local thermal stimulation conditions: A novel analytical model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Chen, Siyuan & Wang, Yanhong & Lang, Xuemei & Fan, Shuanshi & Li, Gang, 2023. "Rapid and high hydrogen storage in epoxycyclopentane hydrate at moderate pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Maria Filomena Loreto & Umberta Tinivella & Flavio Accaino & Michela Giustiniani, 2010. "Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Xu, Chun-Gang & Cai, Jing & Yu, Yi-Song & Yan, Ke-Feng & Li, Xiao-Sen, 2018. "Effect of pressure on methane recovery from natural gas hydrates by methane-carbon dioxide replacement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 527-536.
    8. Guan, Dawei & Qu, Aoxing & Gao, Peng & Fan, Qi & Li, Qingping & Zhang, Lunxiang & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Improved temperature distribution upon varying gas producing channel in gas hydrate reservoir: Insights from the Joule-Thomson effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    9. Choi, Wonjung & Lee, Yohan & Mok, Junghoon & Seo, Yongwon, 2020. "Influence of feed gas composition on structural transformation and guest exchange behaviors in sH hydrate – Flue gas replacement for energy recovery and CO2 sequestration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Luís Bernardes & Júlio Carneiro & Pedro Madureira & Filipe Brandão & Cristina Roque, 2015. "Determination of Priority Study Areas for Coupling CO2 Storage and CH 4 Gas Hydrates Recovery in the Portuguese Offshore Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    11. You, Zeshao & Li, Yanghui & Yang, Meixiao & Wu, Peng & Liu, Tao & Li, Jiayu & Hu, Wenkang & Song, Yongchen, 2024. "Investigation of particle-scale mechanical behavior of hydrate-bearing sands using DEM: Focus on hydrate habits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Nicola Varini & Niall J. English & Christian R. Trott, 2012. "Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Clathrate Hydrates on Specialised Hardware Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.
    13. Cheng, Fanbao & Sun, Xiang & Li, Yanghui & Ju, Xin & Yang, Yaobin & Liu, Xuanji & Liu, Weiguo & Yang, Mingjun & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Numerical analysis of coupled thermal-hydro-chemo-mechanical (THCM) behavior to joint production of marine gas hydrate and shallow gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Lee, Joonseop & Lee, Dongyoung & Seo, Yongwon, 2021. "Experimental investigation of the exact role of large-molecule guest substances (LMGSs) in determining phase equilibria and structures of natural gas hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    15. Zhang, Xuemin & Zhang, Shanling & Liu, Qingqing & Huang, Tingting & Yang, Huijie & Li, Jinping & Wang, Yingmei & Wu, Qingbai & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Experimental study of gas recovery behaviors from methane hydrate-bearing sediments by CO2 replacement below freezing point," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    16. Zhong, Jin-Rong & Sun, Yi-Fei & Li, Wen-Zhi & Xie, Yan & Chen, Guang-Jin & Sun, Chang-Yu & Yang, Lan-Ying & Qin, Hui-Bo & Pang, Wei-Xin & Li, Qing-Ping, 2019. "Structural transition range of methane-ethane gas hydrates during decomposition below ice point," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 873-881.
    17. Xue, Kunpeng & Liu, Yu & Yu, Tao & Yang, Lei & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Numerical simulation of gas hydrate production in shenhu area using depressurization: The effect of reservoir permeability heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Han Xue & Linhai Li & Yiqun Wang & Youhua Lu & Kai Cui & Zhiyuan He & Guoying Bai & Jie Liu & Xin Zhou & Jianjun Wang, 2024. "Probing the critical nucleus size in tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrate formation using surface-anchored nanoparticles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Wang, Yi & Feng, Jing-Chun & Li, Xiao-Sen & Zhang, Yu & Li, Gang, 2016. "Large scale experimental evaluation to methane hydrate dissociation below quadruple point in sandy sediment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 372-381.
    20. Yi Wang & Chun-Gang Xu & Xiao-Sen Li & Gang Li & Zhao-Yang Chen, 2013. "Similarity Analysis in Scaling a Gas Hydrates Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:2026-:d:234638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.