IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i10p2843-d177210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Investigation on Microscopic Residual Oil Distribution During CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Process in Tight Oil Reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Qian

    (State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Shenglai Yang

    (State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Hongen Dou

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qian Wang

    (State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Lu Wang

    (State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yu Huang

    (State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

The determination of microscopic residual oil distribution is beneficial for exploiting reservoirs to their maximum potential. In order to investigate microscopic residual oil during the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) huff-and-puff process in tight oil reservoirs, several CO 2 huff-and-puff tests with tight sandstone cores were conducted at various conditions. Then, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to determine the microscopic residual oil distribution of the cores. The experiments showed that the oil recovery factor increased from 27.22% to 52.56% when injection pressure increased from 5 MPa to 13 MPa. The oil recovery was unable to be substantially enhanced as the injection pressure further increased beyond the minimum miscible pressure. The lower limit of pore distribution where the oil was recoverable corresponded to relaxation times of 2.68 ms, 1.29 ms, and 0.74 ms at an injection pressure of 5 MPa, 11 MPa, and 16 MPa, respectively. Longer soaking time also increased the lower limit of the oil-recoverable pore distribution. However, more cycles had no obvious effect on expanding the interval of oil-recoverable pore distribution. Therefore, higher injection pressure and longer soaking time convert the residual oil in smaller and blind pores into recoverable oil. This investigation provides some technical ideas for oilfields in design development programs for optimizing the production parameters during the CO 2 huff-and-puff process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Qian & Shenglai Yang & Hongen Dou & Qian Wang & Lu Wang & Yu Huang, 2018. "Experimental Investigation on Microscopic Residual Oil Distribution During CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Process in Tight Oil Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:10:p:2843-:d:177210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2843/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuloaga, Pavel & Yu, Wei & Miao, Jijun & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2017. "Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 181-192.
    2. Ting Chen & Zhengming Yang & Yunhong Ding & Yutian Luo & Dan Qi & Wei Lin & Xinli Zhao, 2018. "Waterflooding Huff-n-puff in Tight Oil Cores Using Online Nuclear Magnetic Resonance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Ren, Bo & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Chen, Guoli & Zhang, Hua, 2016. "Monitoring on CO2 migration in a tight oil reservoir during CCS-EOR in Jilin Oilfield China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Zhang & Yuan Di & Yang Shi & Jinghong Hu, 2018. "Cyclic CH 4 Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Eagle Ford Shale Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Zhengdong Lei & Yishan Liu & Rui Wang & Lei Li & Yuqi Liu & Yuanqing Zhang, 2022. "A Microfluidic Experiment on CO 2 Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery in a Shale Oil Reservoir with High Temperature and Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Wei, Bo & He, Xiaobiao & Li, Xin & Ju, Yiwen & Jin, Jun & Luo, Qiang, 2023. "Residual oil contents of dolomicrite and sandy dolomite tight oil reservoirs after CO2 huff and puff: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Tao Li & Ying Wang & Min Li & Jiahao Ji & Lin Chang & Zheming Wang, 2019. "Study on the Impacts of Capillary Number and Initial Water Saturation on the Residual Gas Distribution by NMR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Muhammad Shahzad Kamal, 2019. "A Novel Approach to Stabilize Foam Using Fluorinated Surfactants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiang & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Dianlin & Lu, Jun & Tong, Jing, 2021. "Characterizing pore-level oil mobilization processes in unconventional reservoirs assisted by state-of-the-art nuclear magnetic resonance technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Yang, Mingyang & Huang, Shijun & Zhao, Fenglan & Sun, Haoyue & Chen, Xinyang, 2024. "Experimental investigation of CO2 huff-n-puff in tight oil reservoirs: Effects of the fracture on the dynamic transport characteristics based on the nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    3. Xingbang Meng & Zhan Meng & Jixiang Ma & Tengfei Wang, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection in Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    5. Wang, Lele & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Pu, Wanfen & Tang, Jinyu & Lu, Jun, 2023. "Performance of a tight reservoir horizontal well induced by gas huff–n–puff integrating fracture geometry, rock stress-sensitivity and molecular diffusion: A case study using CO2, N2 and produced gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    6. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    8. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    9. Rahmad Syah & Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution & Afshin Davarpanah & Dadan Ramdan & Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally, 2021. "A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Junrong Liu & Lu Sun & Zunzhao Li & Xingru Wu, 2019. "Experimental Study on Reducing CO 2 –Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure with Hydrocarbon Agents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Fengshuang Du & Bahareh Nojabaei, 2019. "A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, June.
    12. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2019. "Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 291-304.
    14. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Lingbin Meng & Jing Zheng & Ruizhao Yang & Suping Peng & Yuan Sun & Jingyu Xie & Dewei Li, 2023. "Microseismic Monitoring Technology Developments and Prospects in CCUS Injection Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Ren, Jitian & Xiao, Wenlian & Pu, Wanfen & Tang, Yanbing & Bernabé, Yves & Cheng, Qianrui & Zheng, Lingli, 2024. "Characterization of CO2 miscible/immiscible flooding in low-permeability sandstones using NMR and the VOF simulation method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    17. Ting Chen & Zhengming Yang & Yutian Luo & Wei Lin & Jiaxiang Xu & Yunhong Ding & Jialiang Niu, 2018. "Evaluation of Displacement Effects of Different Injection Media in Tight Oil Sandstone by Online Nuclear Magnetic Resonance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Calderón, Andrés J. & Pekney, Natalie J., 2020. "Optimization of enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    20. Chaohui Lyu & Qing Wang & Zhengfu Ning & Mingqiang Chen & Mingqi Li & Zhili Chen & Yuxuan Xia, 2018. "Investigation on the Application of NMR to Spontaneous Imbibition Recovery of Tight Sandstones: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:10:p:2843-:d:177210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.