IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i8p1207-d108208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Production of Bioethanol by Fermentation of Autohydrolyzed and C 4 mimOAc-Treated Sugarcane Bagasse Employing Various Yeast Strains

Author

Listed:
  • Muzna Hashmi

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2200, USA)

  • Aamer Ali Shah

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Hameed

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
    SA-CIRBS, International Islamic University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan)

  • Arthur J. Ragauskas

    (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2200, USA
    Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
    Center of Renewable Carbon, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4542, USA)

Abstract

This study examines the fermentation of autohydrolyzed and 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (C 4 mimOAc) pretreated sugarcane bagasse, using four different yeast strains to determine the efficiency of bioethanol production. Three strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( S. cerevisiae ) and one of Scheffersomyces stipitis ( S. stipitis ) were employed in this study. It was observed that the sugarcane bagasse autohydrolyzed at 205 °C for 6 min with subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis exhibited the maximum ethanol yield of 70.92 ± 0.09 mg/g-substrate when S. cerevisiae MZ-4 was used. However, a slightly higher ethanol yield of 78.78 ± 0.94 mg/g-substrate was obtained from C 4 mimOAc pretreated bagasse employing S. cerevisiae MZ-4. The study showed that the newly isolated MZ-4 strain exhibited better ethanol yield as compared to commercially available yeast strains S. cerevisiae Uvaferm-43, S. cerevisiae Lalvin EC-1118, and S. stipitis .

Suggested Citation

  • Muzna Hashmi & Aamer Ali Shah & Abdul Hameed & Arthur J. Ragauskas, 2017. "Enhanced Production of Bioethanol by Fermentation of Autohydrolyzed and C 4 mimOAc-Treated Sugarcane Bagasse Employing Various Yeast Strains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-7, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:8:p:1207-:d:108208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/8/1207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/8/1207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonçalves, Fabiano Avelino & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Silvino dos Santos, Everaldo & Teixeira, José A. & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro, 2016. "Bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis and Zymomonas mobilis from delignified coconut fibre mature and lignin extraction according to biorefinery concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 353-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daissy Lorena Restrepo-Serna & Jimmy Anderson Martínez-Ruano & Carlos Ariel Cardona-Alzate, 2018. "Energy Efficiency of Biorefinery Schemes Using Sugarcane Bagasse as Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanaoka, Toshiaki & Fujimoto, Shinji & Kihara, Hideyuki, 2019. "Improvement of the 1,3-butadiene production process from lignin – A comparison with the gasification power generation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1303-1313.
    2. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & Batista Magalhães, Emilianny Rafaely & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino, 2018. "Valorization of an agroextractive residue—Carnauba straw—for the production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 661-669.
    3. Abdulkhani, Ali & Alizadeh, Peyman & Hedjazi, Sahab & Hamzeh, Yahya, 2017. "Potential of Soya as a raw material for a whole crop biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1269-1280.
    4. Gabriel S. Aruwajoye & Alaika Kassim & Akshay K. Saha & Evariste B. Gueguim Kana, 2020. "Prospects for the Improvement of Bioethanol and Biohydrogen Production from Mixed Starch-Based Agricultural Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & de Oliveira Júnior, Sérgio Dantas & de Araújo Padilha, Carlos Eduardo & de Sousa Junior, Francisco Caninde & de Macedo, 2018. "Pretreatments of Carnauba (Copernicia prunifera) straw residue for production of cellulolytic enzymes by Trichorderma reesei CCT-2768 by solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 299-308.
    6. Shanmugam, Sabarathinam & Ngo, Huu-Hao & Wu, Yi-Rui, 2020. "Advanced CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing tools for microbial biofuels production: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1107-1119.
    7. Zaafouri, Kaouther & Ziadi, Manel & ben Hassen-Trabelsi, Aida & Mekni, Sabrine & Aïssi, Balkiss & Alaya, Marwen & Hamdi, Moktar, 2017. "Enzymatic saccharification and liquid state fermentation of hydrothermal pretreated Tunisian Luffa cylindrica (L.) fibers for cellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1209-1213.
    8. Nogueira, Cleitiane da Costa & Padilha, Carlos Eduardo de Araújo & Santos, Everaldo Silvino dos, 2021. "Enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of green coconut fiber under high concentrations of ethylene oxide-based polymers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1536-1547.
    9. Lee, Jechan & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2017. "Study on susceptibility of CO2-assisted pyrolysis of various biomass to CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 510-517.
    10. Ebrahimi, Majid & Caparanga, Alvin R. & Ordono, Emma E. & Villaflores, Oliver B., 2017. "Evaluation of organosolv pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of coconut coir fibers and bioethanol production via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 41-48.
    11. Bayrakci Ozdingis, Asiye Gul & Kocar, Gunnur, 2018. "Current and future aspects of bioethanol production and utilization in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2196-2203.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:8:p:1207-:d:108208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.