IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v8y2020i4p94-d438739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Impact of Participant Sports Events: A Case Study for the Winter World Masters Games 2020 in Tyrol, Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Petri Lintumäki

    (Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Hannes Winner

    (Department of Social Sciences and Economics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Sabrina Scheiber

    (Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Anna Mederle

    (Department of Social Sciences and Economics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Martin Schnitzer

    (Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria)

Abstract

The Winter World Masters Games (WWMGs) are a large sports event for 30+-year-old athletes. As there are neither competitive qualification requirements for participants, nor entrance fees for spectators, the event can be considered as a participatory sports tourism event rather than a spectator event. In 2020, the WWMGs were staged in Innsbruck, Tyrol. In this study, we estimate the payoff of the event for the regional economy by assessing the impacts generated by participant spending and organizational expenditure. Furthermore, we discuss the peculiarities of the masters sports concept. Our empirical work is based on three distinct analyses: (1) economic impact analysis of participant spending, (2) cost-benefit analysis of organizational resource flows, and (3) discussion of impacts with experts in a focus group setting. Our results support the previous findings that masters sports events attract rather affluent and consumption-oriented participants. Indeed, the WWMGs were found to have a regional economic impact of €6.18 million and an estimated yield of €4.40 for each publicly subsidized euro. For an audience interested in the economic impact of events, this paper presents a novel method for handling non-normal expenditure distributions and adds to the understanding of how visitor segmentation can be utilized in an assessment of event impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Petri Lintumäki & Hannes Winner & Sabrina Scheiber & Anna Mederle & Martin Schnitzer, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Participant Sports Events: A Case Study for the Winter World Masters Games 2020 in Tyrol, Austria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:94-:d:438739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/94/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/94/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko & Joanna Poczta, 2018. "A Small-Scale Event and a Big Impact—Is This Relationship Possible in the World of Sport? The Meaning of Heritage Sporting Events for Sustainable Development of Tourism—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Chris Ryan & Tim Lockyer, 2001. "An Economic Impact Case Study: The South Pacific Masters' Games," Tourism Economics, , vol. 7(3), pages 267-275, September.
    3. Mules, Trevor, 1998. "Taxpayer Subsidies for Major Sporting Events," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 25-43, November.
    4. Robert A. Baade & Victor A. Matheson, 2016. "Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 201-218, Spring.
    5. Trevor Mules & Bill Faulkner, 1996. "An economic perspective on special events," Tourism Economics, , vol. 2(2), pages 107-117, June.
    6. Martin Schnitzer & Lukas Haizinger, 2019. "Does the Olympic Agenda 2020 Have the Power to Create a New Olympic Heritage? An Analysis for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games Bid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Trevor Mules, 1998. "Taxpayer Subsidies for Major Sporting Events," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 25-43, January.
    8. Bent Flyvbjerg & Allison Stewart & Alexander Budzier, 2016. "The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games," Papers 1607.04484, arXiv.org.
    9. Peter A. Groothuis & Kurt W. Rotthoff, 2016. "The Economic Impact and Civic Pride Effects of Sports Teams and Mega-Events: Do The Public and the Professionals Agree?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 21-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Schnitzer & Lukas Haizinger, 2019. "Does the Olympic Agenda 2020 Have the Power to Create a New Olympic Heritage? An Analysis for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games Bid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Stefan Szymanski & Bastien Drut, 2020. "The Private Benefit of Public Funding: The FIFA World Cup, UEFA European Championship, and Attendance at Host Country League Soccer," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(7), pages 723-745, October.
    3. Rolfe, John, 2019. "Simple economic frameworks to evaluate public investments in sporting events in regional Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 35-43.
    4. Rasmus K. Storm & Tor Georg Jakobsen & Christian Gjersing Nielsen, 2020. "The impact of Formula 1 on regional economies in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 827-837, June.
    5. Martin Thomas Falk & Markku Vieru, 2021. "Short-term hotel room price effects of sporting events," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 569-588, May.
    6. Matthias Firgo & Oliver Fritz, 2023. "Regionalwirtschaftliche und touristische Effekte von Sportgroßveranstaltungen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 96(7), pages 481-490, July.
    7. Jesyca Salgado-Barandela & à ngel Barajas & Patricio Sánchez-Fernández, 2021. "Sport-event portfolios: An analysis of their ability to attract revenue from tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 436-454, May.
    8. Olmos, Lorena & Bellido, Héctor & Román-Aso, Juan A., 2020. "The effects of mega-events on perceived corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Heffernan, Jackie & O'Brien, Danny, 2010. "Stakeholder influence strategies in bidding for a professional sport franchise license," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 255-268, August.
    10. Storm, Rasmus K. & Thomsen, Frederik & Jakobsen, Tor Georg, 2017. "Do they make a difference? Professional team sports clubs’ effects on migration and local growth: Evidence from Denmark," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 285-295.
    11. Eva Kassens-Noor & John Lauermann, 2018. "Mechanisms of policy failure: Boston’s 2024 Olympic bid," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3369-3384, November.
    12. Wifo, 2023. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 7/2023," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 96(7), July.
    13. Christopher Hautbois & Milena M. Parent & Benoît Séguin, 2012. "How to win a bid for major sporting events? A stakeholder analysis of the 2018 Olympic Winter Games French bid," Post-Print hal-03550776, HAL.
    14. Massiani, Jérôme, 2015. "How much will this event benefit our economy? A checklist for Economic Impact Assessment and application to Milan 2015 International Exhibition," MPRA Paper 68976, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2015.
    15. Firgo, Matthias, 2021. "The causal economic effects of Olympic Games on host regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Kim, Woosoon & Walker, Matthew, 2012. "Measuring the social impacts associated with Super Bowl XLIII: Preliminary development of a psychic income scale," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 91-108.
    17. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo & Maria Rita Pierleoni, 2018. "Assessing The Olympic Games: The Economic Impact And Beyond," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 649-682, July.
    18. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    19. John C. Whitehead & Pamela Wicker, 2024. "The effect of event quality on participants’ intention to revisit a sport event: Monetary valuation and mitigation of hypothetical bias," Working Papers 24-14, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    20. Bent Flyvbjerg & Allison Stewart & Alexander Budzier, 2016. "The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games," Papers 1607.04484, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:94-:d:438739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.