IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i11p302-d1517060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Start Switch for Innovation in “Construction Sequencing”: Research Funding

Author

Listed:
  • Akifumi Kuchiki

    (Institute for International Trade and Investment, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan)

Abstract

Clusters of knowledge-intensive industries and manufacturing industries form industrial agglomeration in Step I and activate innovation in Step II. Industry clusters are formed by building segments. “Construction sequencing” in the construction industry refers to the process of determining the sequence of segments to optimize a project’s resources, budget, and scheduled timeline. The process usually begins by dividing a project into segments. Urban segments consist of public spaces, airports, factories, health, housing, etc. A “segment” is a component of a cluster; the organization of a cluster consists of constructing segments. These segments can be divided into four main categories: human resources, physical infrastructure, institutions, and the living environment. Each segment has a specific function in the process of building a cluster. This study focused on innovation in Step II and extended the Fujita–Thisse model of spatial economics to hypothesize that research expenditure per researcher leads to value being added. The Granger causality was tested for the knowledge and manufacturing industries in nine major countries including China and the U.S. The results showed that the hypothesis was significant in identifying the starting segment of innovation in Step II. Accordingly, it can be concluded that research funding is the start switch that triggers innovation. The policy implication is that activating innovation in cluster policies begins with the establishment of a research fund for researchers in its assigned clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Akifumi Kuchiki, 2024. "Start Switch for Innovation in “Construction Sequencing”: Research Funding," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:302-:d:1517060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Kun & Kenney, Martin, 2007. "Universities/Research Institutes and Regional Innovation Systems: The Cases of Beijing and Shenzhen," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1056-1074, June.
    2. Masahisa Fujita & Jacques‐François Thisse, 2003. "Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Loses from It?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 121-145, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Zhang & Mark D. Partridge & Huasheng Song, 2020. "Amenities and the geography of innovation: evidence from Chinese cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(1), pages 105-145, August.
    2. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Klarl, Torben Alexander, 2015. "Urban-rural migration and congestion costs revisited: is there a triple dividend for cities in developing countries?," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112829, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Chen, Guanghua & Yang, Guoliang & He, Feng & Chen, Kaihua, 2019. "Exploring the effect of political borders on university-industry collaborative research performance: Evidence from China’s Guangdong province," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 58-69.
    5. Masahisa Fujita & Jacques-François Thisse, 2006. "Globalization And The Evolution Of The Supply Chain: Who Gains And Who Loses?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(3), pages 811-836, August.
    6. Helena Barnard & Robin Cowan & Moritz Müller, 2016. "On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects," Working Papers of BETA 2016-04, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Shang, Qingyan & Poon, Jessie P.H. & Yue, Qingtang, 2012. "The role of regional knowledge spillovers on China's innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1164-1175.
    8. Cerina, Fabio & Mureddu, Francesco, 2014. "Is agglomeration really good for growth? Global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.
    9. Prud'homme, Dan, 2012. "Dulling the Cutting Edge: How Patent-Related Policies and Practices Hamper Innovation in China," MPRA Paper 43299, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2012.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "In Search Of Creative Champions In High-Tech Spaces: A Spatial Application Of Strategic Performance Management," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 749-777, December.
    11. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    12. Sargent, John & Matthews, Linda, 2009. "China versus Mexico in the Global EPZ Industry: Maquiladoras, FDI Quality, and Plant Mortality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1069-1082, June.
    13. Sabyasachi Tripathi, 2013. "Do Large Agglomerations Lead To Economic Growth? Evidence From Urban India," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 176-200, November.
    14. Frick, Susanne A. & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2018. "Change in urban concentration and economic growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 156-170.
    15. FUJITA, Masahisa & WEBER, Shlomo, 2003. "Strategic immigration policies and welfare in heterogeneous countries," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2003095, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Chunyun Wang & Senyu Xing & Lixiao Xu, 2023. "A Multi-Regional Input–Output Model to Measure the Spatial Spillover of R&D Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Kurita, Kenichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Circular economy in cities: An economic theory to decouple economic development from waste," MPRA Paper 105435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Yu, 2020. "Transportation infrastructure and efficient energy services: A perspective of China's manufacturing industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Akifumi Kuchiki, 2022. "Linking spatial economics and sequencing economics for the Osaka tourism agglomeration," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 610-626, June.
    20. Zhang, Min & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2024. "Government reform and innovation performance in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:302-:d:1517060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.