IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v11y2023i9p222-d1229537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Technology Adoption as a Source of Competitive Advantage for Pineapple Production in Ejigbo, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Moshood Olatunde Oladapo

    (Greater Manchester Business School, University of Bolton, Bolton BL1 1SW, UK)

  • Moheeb Abualqumboz

    (Department of Operations, Technology, Events and Hospitality Management, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK)

  • Lawrence M. Ngoe

    (Greater Manchester Business School, University of Bolton, Bolton BL1 1SW, UK)

  • Abiodun Kolawole Oyetunji

    (Department of Estate Management, University of Benin, Benin City 300287, Nigeria
    Lancaster Environment Centre (LEC), Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
    Department of Construction Management, Global Banking School, Devonshire Street North, Manchester M12 6JH, UK)

  • Chiemela Victor Amaechi

    (Department of Construction Management, Global Banking School, Devonshire Street North, Manchester M12 6JH, UK
    School of Engineering, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YR, UK
    Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Rasheed Bello

    (Greater Manchester Business School, University of Bolton, Bolton BL1 1SW, UK)

  • Ebube Charles Amaechi

    (Department of Zoology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240003, Nigeria)

Abstract

Adopting new technology as a strategic resource can result in a competitive edge in any market. However, a competitive advantage cannot be acquired in the production of horticultural goods without first embracing the practices that are inextricably linked to those goods. This paper investigates the adoption of farm practices in conjunction with technology transferred to farmers. Some research debates on competitive advantages have identified both resources and processes of production as sources of competitive advantage. The emphasis on the resource-based view and dynamic capability view stipulates that firms acquire competitiveness via internal resources and capabilities. However, there has not been much empirical exploration of horticultural production sustainability in this regard despite its sufficiently outstanding contribution to the gross domestic product in developing and developed economies. It specifically discusses how Technology Adoption Practices (TAP) could lead to a competitive advantage in horticulture with particular reference to the production of pineapple fruit in Ejigbo, Nigeria. From the angle of professional practice; the study provides an insight into how farmers strive to suggest solutions to practical challenges faced within the production process. Therefore, it is essential to have practices in place for the adoption of sustainable technology. The outcomes of the study generate two different storylines and demonstrate that attributing factors as well as reinforcing capabilities both boost competitiveness at the farm level and enhance the farmers’ desire for farming pineapples. Pineapple farmers in Ejigbo employ a differentiation approach to gain a competitive advantage in their agro-farming industry. This could lead to an increase in the volume of fresh pineapple products that are exported.

Suggested Citation

  • Moshood Olatunde Oladapo & Moheeb Abualqumboz & Lawrence M. Ngoe & Abiodun Kolawole Oyetunji & Chiemela Victor Amaechi & Rasheed Bello & Ebube Charles Amaechi, 2023. "Sustainable Technology Adoption as a Source of Competitive Advantage for Pineapple Production in Ejigbo, Nigeria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:9:p:222-:d:1229537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/9/222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/9/222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chulin Pan & Yufeng Jiang & Mingliang Wang & Shuang Xu & Ming Xu & Yixin Dong, 2021. "How Can Agricultural Corporate Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Green Intellectual Capital? A New Environmental Management Approach to Green Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Thomas C. Powell, 2001. "Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 875-888, September.
    3. Ioanna Kastelli & Aggelos Tsakanikas & Yannis Caloghirou, 2018. "Technology transfer as a mechanism for dynamic transformation in the food sector," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 882-900, August.
    4. Mugera, Amin W. & Bitsch, Vera, 2005. "Managing Labor on Dairy Farms: A Resource-Based Perspective with Evidence from Case Studies," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20.
    5. Beaman, Lori & Dillon, Andrew, 2018. "Diffusion of agricultural information within social networks: Evidence on gender inequalities from Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 147-161.
    6. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    7. Bowman, Cliff & Ambrosini, Veronique, 2007. "Identifying Valuable Resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 320-329, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lobo Carla Azevedo & Fernandes Cristina & Ferreira João & Veiga Pedro M. & Gerschewski Stephan, 2023. "The Determinants of International Performance for Family Firms: Understanding the Effects of Resources, Capabilities, and Market Orientation," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 773-811, July.
    2. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    3. S Anukriti & Catalina Herrera‐Almanza & Praveen K. Pathak & Mahesh Karra, 2020. "Curse of the Mummy‐ji: The Influence of Mothers‐in‐Law on Women in India†," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1328-1351, October.
    4. Carlson, Laura A. & Bitsch, Vera, 2018. "Social sustainability in the ready-made-garment sector in Bangladesh: an institutional approach to supply chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(2), March.
    5. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    6. Munjal, Surender & Requejo, Ignacio & Kundu, Sumit K., 2019. "Offshore outsourcing and firm performance: Moderating effects of size, growth and slack resources," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 484-494.
    7. Hui Yang & Xiangda Xu, 2024. "Coupling and Coordination Analysis of Digital Economy and Green Agricultural Development: Evidence from Major Grain Producing Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-29, May.
    8. Ifrah Quais & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2017. "Measuring the Performance of Logistics Industry in the Context of Karachi," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 9(5), pages 24-34.
    9. Charlie Tchinda & Marcus Dejardin, 2021. "Are Business Policy Measures in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic to Be Equally Valued? An Exploration According to SMEs Owners’ Business Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, October.
    10. Ölkers, Tim & Liu, Shuang & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2023. "A typology of Malian farmers and their credit repayment performance - An unsupervised machine learning approach," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334547, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    11. Lapierre, Margaux & Le Velly, Gwenolé & Bougherara, Douadia & Préget, Raphaële & Sauquet, Alexandre, 2023. "Designing agri-environmental schemes to cope with uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Sun, Wenbin & Price, Joseph & Ding, Yuan, 2019. "The longitudinal effects of internationalization on firm performance: The moderating role of marketing capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 326-337.
    13. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    14. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Chen, Yung-ray & Huang, Hsu-Feng, 2015. "Information technology and partnership dynamic capabilities in international subcontracting relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 276-286.
    15. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    16. Deming, Justine & Macken-Walsh, Áine & O’Brien, Bernadette & Kinsella, James, 2020. "‘Good’ farm management employment: Emerging values in the contemporary Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2021. "Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3095-3104, November.
    18. Omorodion Omoregbe & Eniola Yemi Taiwo, 2017. "Production Facilities Maintenance Practices and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Paint Manufacturing Industry, Benin City, Nigeria," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 209-222.
    19. Ovcina Adnan & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic Maja, 2024. "The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation and Project Implementation Management System for Non-Profit Project Performance in Developing Countries," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 63-76.
    20. Carl Åberg & Mariateresa Torchia, 2020. "Do boards of directors foster strategic change? A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 655-684, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:9:p:222-:d:1229537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.