IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v3y2018i3p34-d168773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Distribution of Overhead Power Lines and Underground Cables in Germany in 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Eichhorn

    (Department Bioenergy, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH (UFZ), 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Miron Thylmann

    (Bosch & Partner GmbH, 10627 Berlin, Germany)

  • Wolfgang Peters

    (Bosch & Partner GmbH, 10627 Berlin, Germany)

  • Pascal Kinast

    (Bosch & Partner GmbH, 10627 Berlin, Germany)

  • Daniela Thrän

    (Department Bioenergy, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH (UFZ), 04318 Leipzig, Germany
    Department Bioenergy Systems, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum DBFZ, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Martin Bauschmann

    (Department Bioenergy Systems, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum DBFZ, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Stefanie Seitz

    (Department Bioenergy Systems, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum DBFZ, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Jens Ponitka

    (Department of Nature Conservation and Renewable Energy, German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, 04277 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

In the context of transformative energy policy frameworks, such as the German “Energiewende”, state and federal agencies, regulators, and country planners need reliable data on the energy system infrastructure to make substantiated decisions about line routing and extension. The decision-making processes are accompanied by interdisciplinary research efforts in the areas of energy system planning and modelling, economic viability, and environmental impact, e.g., visual amenity or potential impacts on species. Proved data on the spatial distribution of the electricity transmission and distribution network can inform these efforts, in particular when combined with key technological parameters, like installed capacity, total size, and required space. Without these data, adequate assessments of potential impacts, e.g., the collision of birds with overhead lines, are not possible. However, no such comprehensive dataset exists for Germany. The dataset produced in this paper is based on open-source data using OpenStreetMap (OSM). It covers the spatial distribution of overhead power lines and underground cables of Germany, combined with the attributes needed for adequate environmental impact assessment of overhead lines, such as voltage levels, route length, and circuit lengths. Furthermore, the dataset is validated by different publicly available statistics provided by the German Federal Grid Agency and official spatial data of the Federal Office of Cartography and Geodesy.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Eichhorn & Miron Thylmann & Wolfgang Peters & Pascal Kinast & Daniela Thrän & Martin Bauschmann & Stefanie Seitz & Jens Ponitka, 2018. "Spatial Distribution of Overhead Power Lines and Underground Cables in Germany in 2016," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-7, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:34-:d:168773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/3/34/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/3/34/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kemfert, Claudia & Kunz, Friedrich & Rosellón, Juan, 2016. "A welfare analysis of electricity transmission planning in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 446-452.
    2. Razeghi, Ghazal & Brouwer, Jack & Samuelsen, Scott, 2016. "A spatially and temporally resolved model of the electricity grid – Economic vs environmental dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 540-556.
    3. Jean-Nicolas Louis & Stéphane Allard & Vincent Debusschere & Silvana Mima & Tuan Tran-Quoc & Nouredine Hadjsaid, 2018. "Environmental impact indicators for the electricity mix and network development planning towards 2050 – A POLES and EUTGRID model," Post-Print hal-01863887, HAL.
    4. Louis, Jean-Nicolas & Allard, Stéphane & Debusschere, Vincent & Mima, Silvana & Tran-Quoc, Tuan & Hadjsaid, Nouredine, 2018. "Environmental impact indicators for the electricity mix and network development planning towards 2050 – A POLES and EUTGRID model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 618-628.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allard, Stéphane & Debusschere, Vincent & Mima, Silvana & Quoc, Tuan Tran & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick, 2020. "Considering distribution grids and local flexibilities in the prospective development of the European power system by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Zurano-Cervelló, Patricia & Pozo, Carlos & Mateo-Sanz, Josep María & Jiménez, Laureano & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2019. "Sustainability efficiency assessment of the electricity mix of the 28 EU member countries combining data envelopment analysis and optimized projections," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Fózer, Dániel & Volanti, Mirco & Passarini, Fabrizio & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Mizsey, Péter, 2020. "Bioenergy with carbon emissions capture and utilisation towards GHG neutrality: Power-to-Gas storage via hydrothermal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Louis, Jean-Nicolas & Allard, Stéphane & Kotrotsou, Freideriki & Debusschere, Vincent, 2020. "A multi-objective approach to the prospective development of the European power system by 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Jean-Nicolas Louis & Stéphane Allard & Freideriki Kotrotsou & Vincent Debusschere, 2020. "A multi-objective approach to the prospective development of the European power system by 2050," Post-Print hal-02376337, HAL.
    6. Purvins, Arturs & Gerbelova, Hana & Sereno, Luigi & Minnebo, Philip, 2021. "Social welfare impact from enhanced Trans-Asian electricity trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    7. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.
    8. Naqvi, Muhammad & Yan, Jinyue & Dahlquist, Erik & Naqvi, Salman Raza, 2017. "Off-grid electricity generation using mixed biomass compost: A scenario-based study with sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 363-370.
    9. Hanemann, Philipp & Bruckner, Thomas, 2018. "Effects of electric vehicles on the spot market price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 255-266.
    10. Shin, Hansol & Kim, Tae Hyun & Kim, Hyoungtae & Lee, Sungwoo & Kim, Wook, 2019. "Environmental shutdown of coal-fired generators for greenhouse gas reduction: A case study of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2021. "Analysing electricity flows and congestions: Looking at locational patterns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Kendziorski, Mario & Göke, Leonard & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Kemfert, Claudia & Zozmann, Elmar, 2022. "Centralized and decentral approaches to succeed the 100% energiewende in Germany in the European context – A model-based analysis of generation, network, and storage investments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Lang, Lukas Maximilian & Dallinger, Bettina & Lettner, Georg, 2020. "The meaning of flow-based market coupling on redispatch measures in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Claudia Kemfert & Clemens Gerbaulet & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2016. "Stromnetze und Speichertechnologien für die Energiewende - eine Analyse mit Bezug zur Diskussion des EEG 2016: Gutachten im Auftrag der Hermann-Scheer-Stiftung," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, edition 0, volume 112, number pbk112.
    15. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Maria Dicorato & Gioacchino Tricarico & Giuseppe Forte & Francesca Marasciuolo, 2021. "Technical Indicators for the Comparison of Power Network Development in Scenario Evaluations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Göke, Leonard & Kendziorski, Mario & Kemfert, Claudia & Hirschhausen, Christian von, 2022. "Accounting for spatiality of renewables and storage in transmission planning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Croonenbroeck, Carsten & Palm, Marcel, 2020. "A spatio-temporal Durbin fixed effects IV-Model for ENTSO-E electricity flows analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 205-213.
    19. Athawale, Rasika & Felder, Frank A., 2023. "Overbuilding transmission: A case study and policy analysis of the Indian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Razeghi, Ghazal & Samuelsen, Scott, 2016. "Impacts of plug-in electric vehicles in a balancing area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1142-1156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:34-:d:168773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.