IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v2y2017i1p2-d86516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Make Sense of Team Sport Data: From Acquisition to Data Modeling and Research Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Stein

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Halldór Janetzko

    (Department of Geography, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Daniel Seebacher

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Alexander Jäger

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Manuel Nagel

    (Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Jürgen Hölsch

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Sven Kosub

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Tobias Schreck

    (Institute for Computer Graphics and Knowledge Visualization, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Daniel A. Keim

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Michael Grossniklaus

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

Abstract

Automatic and interactive data analysis is instrumental in making use of increasing amounts of complex data. Owing to novel sensor modalities, analysis of data generated in professional team sport leagues such as soccer, baseball, and basketball has recently become of concern, with potentially high commercial and research interest. The analysis of team ball games can serve many goals, e.g., in coaching to understand effects of strategies and tactics, or to derive insights improving performance. Also, it is often decisive to trainers and analysts to understand why a certain movement of a player or groups of players happened, and what the respective influencing factors are. We consider team sport as group movement including collaboration and competition of individuals following specific rule sets. Analyzing team sports is a challenging problem as it involves joint understanding of heterogeneous data perspectives, including high-dimensional, video, and movement data, as well as considering team behavior and rules (constraints) given in the particular team sport. We identify important components of team sport data, exemplified by the soccer case, and explain how to analyze team sport data in general. We identify challenges arising when facing these data sets and we propose a multi-facet view and analysis including pattern detection, context-aware analysis, and visual explanation. We also present applicable methods and technologies covering the heterogeneous aspects in team sport data.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Stein & Halldór Janetzko & Daniel Seebacher & Alexander Jäger & Manuel Nagel & Jürgen Hölsch & Sven Kosub & Tobias Schreck & Daniel A. Keim & Michael Grossniklaus, 2017. "How to Make Sense of Team Sport Data: From Acquisition to Data Modeling and Research Aspects," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:2-:d:86516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/2/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/2/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Leser & Bernhard Moser & Thomas Hoch & Johannes Stögerer & Gernot Kellermayr & Stephan Reinsch & Arnold Baca, 2015. "Expert-oriented modelling of a 1vs1-situation in football," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 949-966, December.
    2. Schelling, Thomas C, 1969. "Models of Segregation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 488-493, May.
    3. Dirk Helbing & Joachim Keltsch & Péter Molnár, 1997. "Modelling the evolution of human trail systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6637), pages 47-50, July.
    4. Stefan Schmidhofer & Roland Leser & Michael Ebert, 2014. "A comparison between the structure in elite tennis and kids tennis on scaled courts (Tennis 10s)," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 829-840, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frevel, Nicolas & Beiderbeck, Daniel & Schmidt, Sascha L., 2022. "The impact of technology on sports – A prospective study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Simone Fiori & Andrea Vitali, 2019. "Statistical Modeling of Trivariate Static Systems: Isotonic Models," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Mateo Rico-Garcia & Juan Botero-Valencia & Ruber Hernández-García, 2022. "Vertical Jump Data from Inertial and Optical Motion Tracking Systems," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gautier, Pieter & van Vuuren, Aico & Siegmann, Arjen, 2007. "The Effect of the Theo van Gogh Murder on House Prices in Amsterdam," CEPR Discussion Papers 6175, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    3. Jeremy Pais & Scott South & Kyle Crowder, 2009. "White Flight Revisited: A Multiethnic Perspective on Neighborhood Out-Migration," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 28(3), pages 321-346, June.
    4. Lindbeck, Assar, 1997. "Incentives and Social Norms in Household Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 370-377, May.
    5. Karla Hoff & Arijit Sen, 2005. "Homeownership, Community Interactions, and Segregation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1167-1189, September.
    6. Nick Drydakis, 2008. "Integrated Roma Earnings: A Multivariate Analysis for the Discrimination Hypothesis in Greece," Working Papers 0829, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    7. Sauer, Johannes & Zilberman, David, 2009. "Innovation Behaviour At Farm Level – Selection And Identification," 83rd Annual Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2009, Dublin, Ireland 51073, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Steven N. Durlauf, 1996. "Statistical Mechanics Approaches to Socioeconomic Behavior," NBER Technical Working Papers 0203, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Zhiwei Cui & Yan-An Hwang, 2017. "House exchange and residential segregation in networks," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 125-147, March.
    10. Allouch, Nizar, 2017. "The cost of segregation in (social) networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 329-342.
    11. Joshua M. Epstein, 2007. "Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Science," Introductory Chapters, in: Generative Social Science Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton University Press.
    12. Dolado, Juan J. & Felgueroso, Florentino & Almunia, Miguel, 2005. "Do Men and Women-Economists Choose the Same Research Fields? Evidence from Top-50 Departments," IZA Discussion Papers 1859, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Norman Braun, 1995. "Individual Thresholds and Social Diffusion," Rationality and Society, , vol. 7(2), pages 167-182, April.
    14. Bøg, Martin, 2007. "Is Segregation Robust?," MPRA Paper 8774, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Lemoine, Derek M. & Traeger, Christian P., 2010. "Tipping Points and Ambiguity in the Economics of Climate Change," CUDARE Working Papers 98127, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Grauwin, Sébastian & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Jensen, Pablo, 2012. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 124-141.
    17. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mattia Guerini & Francesco Lamperti & Alessio Moneta & Andrea Roventini, 2017. "Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance," LEM Papers Series 2017/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    18. Bayer, Patrick & McMillan, Robert & Rueben, Kim S., 2004. "What drives racial segregation? New evidence using Census microdata," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 514-535, November.
    19. Frederico Roman Ramos & Ciro Biderma, 2014. "Urban Sprawl And Spatial Segregation In São Paulo Metropolitan Region," Anais do XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 41st Brazilian Economics Meeting] 172, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    20. Harris Selod & Yves Zenou, 2006. "City Structure, Job Search and Labour Discrimination: Theory and Policy Implications," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(514), pages 1057-1087, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:2-:d:86516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.