IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v6y2024i4p80-1676d1543397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Environmental Performance: A Method for Identifying and Prioritizing Key Environmental Issues in Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dellise Marie

    (Mines Saint-Etienne, University Lyon, CNRS, University Jean Monnet, University Lumière Lyon 2, University Lyon 3 Jean Moulin, ENS Lyon, ENTPE, ENSA Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Jonathan Villot

    (Mines Saint-Etienne, University Lyon, CNRS, University Jean Monnet, University Lumière Lyon 2, University Lyon 3 Jean Moulin, ENS Lyon, ENTPE, ENSA Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Rodolphe Gaucher

    (Ineris, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, F-60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, France)

  • Anne Amardeil

    (EDF (Electricité de France), DIPDE, 154 Avenue Thiers, F-69458 Lyon, France)

  • Valérie Laforest

    (Mines Saint-Etienne, University Lyon, CNRS, University Jean Monnet, University Lumière Lyon 2, University Lyon 3 Jean Moulin, ENS Lyon, ENTPE, ENSA Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

Abstract

BAT-based regulations necessitate defining key environmental issues (KEIs) to focus data collection and discussions on the main topics when establishing best available techniques (BATs) at the sector level. However, Article 14 of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) suggests that some significant environmental issues may not be covered by BAT conclusions but still require the implementation of BATs at the local level, even in the absence of defined sectoral BAT references. The IED, along with the associated Commission Implementing Decisions and guides, does not offer guidelines for selecting KEIs at the local level, whether by the competent authority or the operator. To ensure full compliance with the IED by installations under its scope, this paper proposes a methodology for determining KEIs locally. Based on the environmental aspects of the installation, the sensitivity of the environment, and the levels of emissions or consumption, this methodology has been tested on a case study at the plant level to demonstrate its effectiveness. The paper then discusses the contributions and limitations of the methodology and suggests areas for future research. The proposed methodology was tested at the factory level, where it effectively identified and prioritized key environmental issues (KEIs) by focusing on site-specific environmental aspects not covered by sectoral BAT conclusions. The results suggested improved alignment with local environmental challenges, indicating the methodology’s effectiveness in capturing key issues that may require immediate action under Article 14 of the IED. This approach provides a practical framework for prioritizing environmental impacts based on local context and regulatory requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Dellise Marie & Jonathan Villot & Rodolphe Gaucher & Anne Amardeil & Valérie Laforest, 2024. "Enhancing Environmental Performance: A Method for Identifying and Prioritizing Key Environmental Issues in Industry," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:80-1676:d:1543397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/4/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/4/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piet, Gerjan J. & Knights, Antony M. & Jongbloed, Ruud H. & Tamis, Jacqueline E. & de Vries, Pepijn & Robinson, Leonie A., 2017. "Ecological risk assessments to guide decision-making: Methodology matters," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Branko Kontic & Marko Gerbec, 2009. "The Role of Environmental Accidental Risk Assessment in the Process of Granting Development Consent," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11), pages 1601-1614, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanyan Jia & Xiaolan Tang & Wei Liu, 2020. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Correlation Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value and Landscape Ecological Risk in Wuhu City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Xupu Li & Shuangshuang Li & Yufeng Zhang & Patrick J. O’Connor & Liwei Zhang & Junping Yan, 2021. "Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment under Multiple Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Weixu Li & Yanxia Ma & Yongqiang Liu & Yongfu Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Correlation between Ecological Service Value and Ecological Risk of Typical Mountain-Oasis-Desert Ecosystems: A Case Study of Aksu City in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Ying Xia & Jia Li & Enhua Li & Jiajia Liu, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Four Lakes Basin on the Jianghan Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Elena Bisinicu & Valeria Abaza & Laura Boicenco & Filimon Adrian & George-Emanuel Harcota & Oana Marin & Andra Oros & Elena Pantea & Alina Spinu & Florin Timofte & George Tiganov & Oana Vlas & Luminit, 2024. "Spatial Cumulative Assessment of Impact Risk-Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management for Enhanced Sustainability and Biodiversity in the Black Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Qiming Wang & Kun Yang & Lixiao Li & Yanhui Zhu, 2022. "Assessing the Terrain Gradient Effect of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Dianchi Lake Basin of China Using Geo-Information Tupu Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Galparsoro, I. & Korta, M. & Subirana, I. & Borja, Á. & Menchaca, I. & Solaun, O. & Muxika, I. & Iglesias, G. & Bald, J., 2021. "A new framework and tool for ecological risk assessment of wave energy converters projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:80-1676:d:1543397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.