IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v6y2024i2p23-470d1373569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas as Alternative to Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Mauritania: An Integrated Future Approach for Energy Sustainability and Socio-Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Sidahmed Sidi Habib

    (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0862, Japan)

  • Shuichi Torii

    (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0862, Japan)

Abstract

The global shift from conventional energy sources to sustainable alternatives has garnered significant attention, driven by the promise of economic benefits and environmental sustainability. The current study rigorously investigated the economic advantages and sustainability achieved from the transition of households in Mauritania from liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to biogas utilization. The study constitutes a robust case study that centers on assessing the multifaceted impacts of this transition on household finances and overall quality of life in Mauritania. This case focuses on biogas technology adoption and its role as a competitor of LPG in Mauritania. The energy poverty portfolio of the nation has been explored and livestock waste generation and biogas production potential have been estimated at 2451 million cubic meters annually. Biogas production can fulfill 50% of the energy requirement for cooking purposes within the country. The community scale fixed-dome-type biogas digesters have been recommended for Mauritania by considering a community of 100 families. The calculated payback period for the community project is 74 months, and after the payback period, continuous monthly benefits of USD 1750 will be started. Livestock manure is directly utilized for farming practices in Mauritania, which produces 10.7 Gg of methane emissions per year. Biogas production is a clean and economically viable option for Mauritania, which can also be beneficial for reducing the methane emissions footprints of the livestock sector. This case study will prove as a vital project for other African nations if successfully implemented. Multiple recommendations for the policy-makers of Mauritania have also been formulated, like tariffs on biogas production facilities and swift financing schemes, which can further strengthen the biogas production on a national scale. International funders should also take part in coping with the energy demand of Mauritania and its mission to mitigate climate change rather than utilizing LPG on a national scale. Biogas production and utilization are much cheaper compared with the fluctuating prices of LPG and ensure health when cooking.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidahmed Sidi Habib & Shuichi Torii, 2024. "Biogas as Alternative to Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Mauritania: An Integrated Future Approach for Energy Sustainability and Socio-Economic Development," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:23-470:d:1373569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/2/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/2/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Tingting & Ferrari, Giovanni & Pezzuolo, Andrea & Alengebawy, Ahmed & Jin, Keda & Yang, Gaozhong & Li, Qiang & Ai, Ping, 2023. "Evaluation and analysis of biogas potential from agricultural waste in Hubei Province, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Kabyanga, Moris & Balana, Bedru B. & Mugisha, Johnny & Walekhwa, Peter N. & Smith, Jo & Glenk, Klaus, 2018. "Economic potential of flexible balloon biogas digester among smallholder farmers: A case study from Uganda," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 392-400.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sidahmed Sidi Habib & Shuichi Torii & Kavitha Mol S. & Aravind Jayarajan, 2025. "Biogas and Organic Manure Production from Anerobic Digestion of Rubber Plant Effluent, Gliricidia Leaves, and Inoculum: Energy Sustainability and Socio-Economic Development of Mauritania," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artur Krukowski & Anna Nowak & Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Monika Różańska-Boczula, 2024. "Evaluation of the Significance of Agriculture in Renewable Energy Production in the Member States of the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska & Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas, 2024. "Sustainable Energy Development and Agriculture in European Union Member States—Territorial Differentiation and Interrelationships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Nguyen, Thanh Hung & Doan, Quang-Van & Khan, Ansar & Derdouri, Ahmed & Anand, Prashant & Niyogi, Dev, 2024. "The potential of agricultural and livestock wastes as a source of biogas in Vietnam: Energetic, economic and environmental evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Charikleia Karakosta & Jason Papathanasiou, 2024. "Climate-Driven Sustainable Energy Investments: Key Decision Factors for a Low-Carbon Transition Using a Multi-Criteria Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Ahmad, Munir & Khan, Irfan & Shahzad Khan, Muhammad Qaiser & Jabeen, Gul & Jabeen, Hafiza Samra & Işık, Cem, 2023. "Households' perception-based factors influencing biogas adoption: Innovation diffusion framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    6. Bin Yang & Weiguo Jia & Yi Yu & Hui Zhang, 2024. "Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Waste Biogas Production System in China Based on Emergy and Carbon Evaluation Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Gianmaria Tassinari & Dušan Drabik & Stefano Boccaletti & Claudio Soregaroli, 2021. "Case studies research in the bioeconomy: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 286-303.
    8. Oliveira, Helena Rodrigues & Kozlowsky-Suzuki, Betina & Björn, Annika & Shakeri Yekta, Sepehr & Caetano, Cristiane Fonseca & Pinheiro, Érika Flávia Machado & Marotta, Humberto & Bassin, João Paulo & O, 2024. "Biogas potential of biowaste: A case study in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Serhiy Zabolotnyy, 2024. "Investigating the Nexus Between Energy Transition Reporting Practices and Corporate Efficiency in the European Agri-Food Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Nazia Yasmin & Philipp Grundmann, 2019. "Pre- and Post-Adoption Beliefs about the Diffusion and Continuation of Biogas-Based Cooking Fuel Technology in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Nurgul Moldybayeva & Seitkazy Keshuov & Kajrat Kenzhetaev & Demessova Saule & Aigul Taldybayeva & Ivaylo Stoyanov & Teodor Iliev, 2024. "Decision Matrix in an Autonomous Power System for Agro-Industrial Complexes with Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Iulian Voicea & Florin Nenciu & Nicolae-Valentin Vlăduț & Mihai-Gabriel Matache & Catalin Persu & Dan Cujbescu, 2024. "Exploring a Self-Sufficiency Approach within a Sustainable Integrated Pisciculture Farming System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Renata Przygodzka & Aleksandra Badora & Krzysztof Kud & Jarosław Mioduszewski & Marian Woźniak & Artur Stec, 2024. "The Importance of Public Sources of Financing the Development of Renewable Energy in Agriculture, Using the Example of Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Gongyi Li & Tao Luo & Jianghua Xiong & Yanna Gao & Xi Meng & Yaoguo Zuo & Yi Liu & Jing Ma & Qiuwen Chen & Yuxin Liu & Yichong Xin & Yangjie Ye, 2025. "Analysis of Dynamic Biogas Consumption in Chinese Rural Areas at Village, Township, and County Levels," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:23-470:d:1373569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.