IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2024i1p25-d1553000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Energy Development and Agriculture in European Union Member States—Territorial Differentiation and Interrelationships

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Wyrwa

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Podgórna 50, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Anetta Barska

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Podgórna 50, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Podgórna 50, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

Abstract

Energy is regarded as a crucial facilitator of social and economic advancement, and, consequently, sustainable development. The concept of sustainable energy development has evolved to become a significant political objective addressed by governments worldwide. All sectors of the economy, including agriculture, require stimulation, which should be triggered by linkages and structural changes contributing to qualitative and quantitative progress. Agriculture has a substantial impact on the environmental footprint, playing a pivotal role in causing climate change. The objective of this article is to address the research gap concerning the monitoring of sustainable development in the energy and agricultural sectors within the European Union. The assessment of sustainability is a complex process since it is a multidisciplinary field of study with practical implications. The progress of sustainable development in the energy and agricultural sectors was evaluated through a comprehensive analysis of relevant literature and statistical data obtained from the Eurostat database and the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL. The analysis encompasses the period between 2015 and 2022. The article employs the taxonomic method, specifically the linear ordering method (standardised sum method), which enables the construction of a synthetic measure. This approach enabled the creation of rankings and comparisons between European Union countries. The studies show that in the European Union, sustainable energy development and sustainable agriculture show significant territorial differentiation. The sustainable energy measures in the countries with the highest scores (Estonia, Sweden, Finland, Austria) were 2–3 times higher than in the countries with the lowest scores (Cyprus, Belgium, Greece, Bulgaria). A similar situation was observed for sustainable agriculture measures—the maximum measures (Estonia, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania) were about two times higher than the minimum measures (Poland, Malta, Slovenia, Luxembourg). The findings indicate that, on the one hand, there have been favourable developments at the national level in Europe, but also that there are a number of existing disparities, together with evidence of potentially significant deviations from the targets set out in the 2030 Agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska & Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas, 2024. "Sustainable Energy Development and Agriculture in European Union Member States—Territorial Differentiation and Interrelationships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:25-:d:1553000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Wyrwa & Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas & Anetta Barska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Development and Sustainable Social Development in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Ranjan Roy & Ngai Weng Chan, 2012. "An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 99-110, March.
    3. Emilia Herman, 2024. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Impact on the Rural Development in EU Countries: A Multivariate Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Alessandro Magrini, 2022. "Correction to: Assessment of agricultural sustainability in European Union countries: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(3), pages 525-526, September.
    5. Alessandro Magrini, 2022. "Assessment of agricultural sustainability in European Union countries: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 673-703, December.
    6. Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Magdalena Borzecka & Stelios Rozakis & Katerina Troullaki & Foteini Vandorou & Malgorzata Wydra, 2024. "Investigating Published Research towards a Fossil-Energy-Free Agriculture Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Anna Nowak & Armand Kasztelan, 2022. "Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 379-405, June.
    9. Mastini, Riccardo & Kallis, Giorgos & Hickel, Jason, 2021. "A Green New Deal without growth?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Anna Murawska & Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann, 2023. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Agricultural and Industrial Sectors—Change Trends, Economic Conditions, and Country Classification: Evidence from the European Union," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krzysztof Piotr Pawłowski & Gabriela Sołtysiak, 2024. "The Potential Impact of the European Green Deal on Farm Production in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Emilia Herman, 2024. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Impact on the Rural Development in EU Countries: A Multivariate Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Oana Coca & Diana Creangă & Ștefan Viziteu & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Gavril Ștefan, 2023. "Analysis of the Determinants of Agriculture Performance at the European Union Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Aneta Zakrzewska & Anna Nowak, 2022. "Diversification of Agricultural Output Intensity across the European Union in Light of the Assumptions of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2024. "The Impact of EU Subsidies on the Competitiveness of Slovak Farms from the Perspective of Legal Form," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2022. "Neoliberalism and climate change: How the free-market myth has prevented climate action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Luo, Rui & Chen, Ping & Wang, Yachao, 2024. "Green investment products, consumer behavior, and regional carbon emissions levels," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas & Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska, 2024. "Sustainable Energy Development and Sustainable Economic Development in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    11. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2022. "Assessing climate policies: an ecological stock–flow consistent perspective," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 38039, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    12. Bärnthaler, Richard, 2024. "Problematising degrowth strategising: On the role of compromise, material interests, and coercion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    13. Shamsheer Haq & Ismet Boz, 2020. "Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2545-2567, March.
    14. Tobias Angel & Alexandre Berthe & Valeria Costantini & Mariagrazia D’Angeli, 2024. "How the nature of inequality reduction matters for CO2 emissions," Working Papers 2024.14, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Susana G. Azevedo & Minelle E. Silva & João C. O. Matias & Gustavo P. Dias, 2018. "The Influence of Collaboration Initiatives on the Sustainability of the Cashew Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Dong, Kangyin & Yang, Senmiao & Wang, Jianda & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Does Geopolitical Risk Accelerate Climate Vulnerability? New Evidence from the European Green Deal," Working Papers 15-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    17. Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Roman Vavrek & Peter Adamišin & Rastislav Kotulič, 2023. "Composite Analysis of Competitiveness: Case Study of Companies Working the Soil in the Slovak Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Liu, Wen & Xu, Jiaqi & She, Shengxiang, 2023. "Green economic development by increasing efficiency of natural resource consumption," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    19. Khan, Yasir & Hassan, Taimoor & Guiqin, Huang & Nabi, Ghulam, 2023. "Analyzing the impact of natural resources and rule of law on sustainable environment: A proposed policy framework for BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    20. Alice Barreca & Rocco Curto & Giorgia Malavasi & Diana Rolando, 2022. "Energy Retrofitting for the Modern Heritage Enhancement in Weak Real Estate Markets: The Olivetti Housing Stock in Ivrea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:25-:d:1553000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.