IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v13y2022i1p16-d795537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of Academics Working from Home during COVID-19: A Qualitative View from Selected South African Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Chux Gervase Iwu

    (School of Business and Finance, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa)

  • Obianuju E. Okeke-Uzodike

    (Faculty of Management Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Emem Anwana

    (Faculty of Management Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Charmaine Helena Iwu

    (Department of Sociology/Community Development, Cornerstone Institute, Cape Town 7441, South Africa)

  • Emmanuel Ekale Esambe

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 7530, South Africa)

Abstract

The continuing crisis caused by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak has raised significant challenges for the higher education community globally. In South Africa, the government-forced lockdown measures and social distancing containment policy changed working arrangements across sectors and organisations. As a result, academics were forced to work from home (WFH), a task for which they were hardly prepared. Several researchers have engaged the WFH situation of academics to understand the relationship between WFH and productivity. As far as we know, very few studies have tried to describe academics’ WFH experiences in relation to the challenges, including determining possible ways of improving their satisfaction with working from home. We examine in this article the experiences of academics working from home across selected universities in South Africa. Using a qualitative approach and applying Atlas.ti for data analysis, our findings show that working from home in academia is a daunting task requiring extensive organisational, personal, and social adjustments. The population comprised all academics irrespective of any demographic or personality characteristic within the management faculty of the participating universities to secure the anonymity of the respondents. Five themes—inability to adapt, lack of a home office, loneliness and isolation, inability to balance family and work, and improving satisfaction with work from home—were identified as significant variables from the participants’ responses. Our analysis suggests that organisations need to customise approaches to engage with the experiences of academics who work from home during COVID-19 and to develop fit-for-purpose support for these academics. The study contributes to the growing research exploring the relationship between COVID-19 lockdown and work in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Chux Gervase Iwu & Obianuju E. Okeke-Uzodike & Emem Anwana & Charmaine Helena Iwu & Emmanuel Ekale Esambe, 2022. "Experiences of Academics Working from Home during COVID-19: A Qualitative View from Selected South African Universities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:16-:d:795537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balazs Aczel & Marton Kovacs & Tanja van der Lippe & Barnabas Szaszi, 2021. "Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Rubia Cobo-Rendon & Karla Lobos Peña & Javier Mella-Norambuena & Nataly Cisternas San Martin & Fernando Peña, 2021. "Longitudinal Analysis of Teacher Technology Acceptance and Its Relationship to Resource Viewing and Academic Performance of College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Wahab Ali, 2020. "Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Satu Kalliola & Tuula Heiskanen, 2022. "Challenges in Work and Employment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-5, November.
    2. Sibonokuhle Ndlovu, 2023. "Preparedness and Response to COVID-19 Disruptions and Learning Challenges for Students with Disabilities in South Africa: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Gil & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Máximo Quiero-Bastías & Marigen Narea & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, 2023. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on researchers: evidence from Chile and Colombia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Ourania Tzoraki & Svetlana Dimitrova & Marin Barzakov & Saad Yaseen & Vasilis Gavalas & Hani Harb & Abas Haidari & Brian P. Cahill & Alexandra Ćulibrk & Ekaterini Nikolarea & Eleni Andrianopulu & Miro, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Working Conditions, Employment, Career Development and Well-Being of Refugee Researchers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Jagoda Mrzyglocka-Chojnacka & Radoslaw Rynca, 2021. "Lessons from Covid‑19: Toward the Conceptual Model of University Management During Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 383-393.
    5. Bijoya Saha & Shah Md Atiqul Haq & Khandaker Jafor Ahmed, 2023. "How does the COVID-19 pandemic influence students’ academic activities? An explorative study in a public university in Bangladesh," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Mohd Shafie Rosli & Nor Shela Saleh & Azlah Md. Ali & Suaibah Abu Bakar & Lokman Mohd Tahir, 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. O’Connor, Jane & Ludgate, Shannon & Le, Quang-Vuong & Le, Huy Thanh & Huynh, Pham Dung Phat, 2023. "Lessons from the pandemic: Teacher educators’ use of digital technologies and pedagogies in Vietnam before, during and after the Covid-19 lockdown," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Sunha Kim & Suzanne Rosenblith & Yunjeong Chang & Shira Pollack, 2020. "Will ICMT Access and Use Support URM Students’ Online Learning in the (Post) COVID-19 Era?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Shafi AlDousari, 2023. "Capacities and Obstacles of Kuwait Medical Educational Sector in Transitioning Education System to Online Form: A Paradigm Shift," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(12), pages 1-88, February.
    10. Cunying Fan & Juan Wang, 2023. "Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use indigenous Chinese Web 2.0 tools in informal English learning: Combining language learning motivation with technology acceptance model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Katerina Bockov�, 2021. "Home Office and Its Influence on Employee Motivation," GATR Journals jmmr272, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Nevenka Popović Šević & Marko Ranković & Dušan Stojaković & Milutin Dobrilović, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Teaching Process in Higher Education in the Republic of Serbia during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Anna Kurowska & Agnieszka Kasperska, 2024. "Work from Home and Perceptions of Career Prospects of Employees with Children," Working Papers 2024-08, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    14. Noé Abraham González-Nieto & Caridad García-Hernández & Margarita Espinosa-Meneses, 2021. "School Culture and Digital Technologies: Educational Practices at Universities within the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Lixuan Sun, 2024. "Translanguaging pedagogy on the digital stage: exploring Chinese undergraduates’ English grammar learning through DingTalk platform," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Susan W. Parker & Mary A. Hansen & Carianne Bernadowski, 2021. "COVID-19 Campus Closures in the United States: American Student Perceptions of Forced Transition to Remote Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Begoña Urien, 2023. "Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    18. Ali Hashemi, 2021. "Previous Studies on The Impact of Online Education in EFL and ESL contexts," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 177-186, September.
    19. Farooq Abdullah & Sumera Kauser, 2023. "Students’ perspective on online learning during pandemic in higher education," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2493-2505, June.
    20. Guillermo M. Chans & Mireille E. Bravo-Gutiérrez & Angelica Orona-Navar & Elvia P. Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Compilation of Chemistry Experiments for an Online Laboratory Course: Student’s Perception and Learning Outcomes in the Context of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:16-:d:795537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.