IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v7y2017i7p58-d104774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Movement Patterns of GPS-Tracked Cattle on Extensive Rangelands Suggest Independence among Individuals?

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell B. Stephenson

    (Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Scottsbluff, NE 69361, USA)

  • Derek W. Bailey

    (Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88001, USA)

Abstract

In behavioral studies, cattle within the same pasture are not considered as independent experimental units because of the potential confounding effects of the herd’s social interactions. However, evaluating cattle behavior on extensive rangelands is logistically challenging for researchers, and treating individual animals as independent experimental units may be beneficial for answering specific research questions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association patterns among global positioning system (GPS)-tracked cattle at six different study sites in the western United States. A Half-Weight Index (HWI) association value was calculated for each pair of GPS-tracked cows (i.e., dyad) to determine the proportion of time that cattle were within 75 m and 500 m of each other. Cattle at two study sites exhibited relatively low mean HWI-association values (i.e., less than 0.23 HWI); whereas, cattle at other study sites tended to have greater mean HWI associations (i.e., greater than 0.35 HWI). Distinguishing features between study sites with low and high association values were the management of cattle prior to the study, herd size, pasture size, and the number of watering points. However, at all ranches except one, at least 75% of all dyadic associations had HWI values of less than 0.5 at 500 m, indicating that most of the GPS-tracked cows were greater than 500 m from each other for over 50% of tracking period. While interactions among cattle in the same pasture are often inevitable, our data suggests that under some situations, movement patterns of a sub-set of individual GPS-tracked cows may have levels of independence that are sufficient for analysis as individual experimental units. Understanding the level of independence among GPS-tracked cattle may provide options for analysis of grazing behavior for individual cattle within the same pasture.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell B. Stephenson & Derek W. Bailey, 2017. "Do Movement Patterns of GPS-Tracked Cattle on Extensive Rangelands Suggest Independence among Individuals?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:7:p:58-:d:104774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/7/58/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/7/58/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihai Valcu & Bart Kempenaers, 2010. "Spatial autocorrelation: an overlooked concept in behavioral ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 902-905.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Experimentally advancing morning emergence time does not increase extra-pair siring success in blue tit males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 346-353.
    2. Michael P. Leung, 2021. "Rate-Optimal Cluster-Randomized Designs for Spatial Interference," Papers 2111.04219, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    3. Mamboleo, Abel Ansporthy & Doscher, Crile & Paterson, Adrian, 2021. "A computational modelling approach to human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    4. Nick Ruktanonchai & David L. Smith & Colette M. St. Mary, 2014. "Selection of interdependent choice of 2 complementary resources," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 35-43.
    5. Pan, Yingjiu & Chen, Shuyan & Niu, Shifeng & Ma, Yongfeng & Tang, Kun, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of built environment on traffic states incorporating spatial heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Patterns of extra-territorial nest-box visits in a songbird suggest a role in extrapair mating," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 150-159.
    7. Carlos F. Carvalho & Ana V. Leitão & Caterina Funghi & Helena R. Batalha & Sandra Reis & Paulo Gama Mota & Ricardo J. Lopes & Gonçalo C. Cardoso, 2013. "Personality traits are related to ecology across a biological invasion," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1091.
    8. Le Jiao & Yue Zhang & Tao Sun & Wei Yang & Dongdong Shao & Peng Zhang & Qiang Liu, 2021. "Spatial Analysis as a Tool for Plant Population Conservation: A Case Study of Tamarix chinensis in the Yellow River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:7:p:58-:d:104774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.