IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v443y2021ics0304380021000223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A computational modelling approach to human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Mamboleo, Abel Ansporthy
  • Doscher, Crile
  • Paterson, Adrian

Abstract

Agent-based and GIS-based models of human-elephant interactions were developed and integrated to evaluate and recommend the best management mitigation strategies to either reduce or eradicate the adverse impacts of human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania. The model estimated the appropriate minimum elephant and human populations, and geographical distances from the edges of protected areas, rivers and conservation corridors. The model results from each modelling scenario were analysed for comparative performance, where minimal recorded incidents of crop damage, human deaths, elephant deaths, and hidden impacts were the primary focus. Selection of the best performing scenario based on the magnitude of the reduction and eradication of adverse impact(s). However, for each selection of the best scenario(s), there were costs that a model user must incur, as there was no cost-free scenario. Reduction of any of the adverse impacts may run counter to fiscal, conservation, land and socioeconomic policies. Therefore, the model user may select the best scenario within the constraints of these policies. It is recommended that the adoption of the best scenario should not rely solely on the type of adverse impacts but also tolerance and resilience level of elephants and the well-being of the affected people. Therefore, the capabilities of people, elephants, and conservationists to accept, tolerate and, ultimately, to recover from a certain level o

Suggested Citation

  • Mamboleo, Abel Ansporthy & Doscher, Crile & Paterson, Adrian, 2021. "A computational modelling approach to human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021000223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.
    2. Bandara, Ranjith & Tisdell, Clement A., 2002. "Asian Elephants as Agricultural Pests: Damages, Economics of Control and Compensation in Sri Lanka," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 48735, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    3. Mihai Valcu & Bart Kempenaers, 2010. "Spatial autocorrelation: an overlooked concept in behavioral ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 902-905.
    4. Ascensão, Fernando & Clevenger, Anthony & Santos-Reis, Margarida & Urbano, Paulo & Jackson, Nathan, 2013. "Wildlife–vehicle collision mitigation: Is partial fencing the answer? An agent-based model approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 36-43.
    5. Neil, Emily & Madsen, Jens Koed & Carrella, Ernesto & Payette, Nicolas & Bailey, Richard, 2020. "Agent-based modelling as a tool for elephant poaching mitigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Haosen & Buchholtz, Erin & Chen, Frederick & Vogel, Susanne & Yu, Chu A.(Alex), 2022. "An agent-based model of elephant crop consumption walks using combinatorial optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    2. Karami, Peyman & Tavakoli, Sajad, 2022. "Identification and analysis of areas prone to conflict with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the vineyards of Malayer County, western Iran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    3. Purathekandy, Anjali & Oommen, Meera Anna & Wikelski, Martin & Subramani, Deepak N., 2024. "An agent-based model of elephant crop raid dynamics in the Periyar–Agasthyamalai complex, India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Haosen & Buchholtz, Erin & Chen, Frederick & Vogel, Susanne & Yu, Chu A.(Alex), 2022. "An agent-based model of elephant crop consumption walks using combinatorial optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    2. Purathekandy, Anjali & Oommen, Meera Anna & Wikelski, Martin & Subramani, Deepak N., 2024. "An agent-based model of elephant crop raid dynamics in the Periyar–Agasthyamalai complex, India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).
    3. Bandara, Ranjith & Tisdell, Clement A., 2002. "Rural and Urban Attitudes to the Conservation of Asian Elephants in Sri Lanka: Empirical Evidence," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 48736, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    4. Michael P. Leung, 2021. "Rate-Optimal Cluster-Randomized Designs for Spatial Interference," Papers 2111.04219, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    5. MacPherson, Brian & Gras, Robin, 2016. "Individual-based ecological models: Adjunctive tools or experimental systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 106-114.
    6. Iñigo Zuberogoitia & Javier del Real & Juan José Torres & Luis Rodríguez & María Alonso & Jabi Zabala, 2014. "Ungulate Vehicle Collisions in a Peri-Urban Environment: Consequences of Transportation Infrastructures Planned Assuming the Absence of Ungulates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Hatlauf, J. & Kunz, F. & Griesberger, P. & Sachser, F. & Hackländer, K., 2024. "A stage-based life cycle implementation for individual-based population viability analyses of grey wolves (Canis lupus) in Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    8. Barr, Abigail & Owens, Trudy & Perera, Ashira, 2020. "Collective management of an environmental threat when exposure is heterogeneous – A complementary methods approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Sören Köpke & Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ruwan Pathiranage & Chandana R. Withanachchi & Deepika U. Gamage & Thushantha S. Nissanka & Chinthana C. Warapitiya & Banu M. Nissanka & Nirangani N. Ranasinghe , 2021. "Human–Elephant Conflict in Sri Lanka: A Critical Review of Causal Explanations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Nick Ruktanonchai & David L. Smith & Colette M. St. Mary, 2014. "Selection of interdependent choice of 2 complementary resources," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 35-43.
    11. Kevin E Jablonski & Randall B Boone & Paul J Meiman, 2018. "An agent-based model of cattle grazing toxic Geyer's larkspur," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Prof Clem Tisdell & R. Bandara, 2003. "Does The Economic Value Of The Asian Elephant To Urban Dwellers Exceed Their Cost To The Farmers? A Sri Lankan Study," Discussion Papers Series 325, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas & Carlo Lavalle, 2023. "Identification of Urban and Wildlife Terrestrial Corridor Intersections for Planning of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Measures," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Pan, Yingjiu & Chen, Shuyan & Niu, Shifeng & Ma, Yongfeng & Tang, Kun, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of built environment on traffic states incorporating spatial heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Pirotta, Enrico & New, Leslie & Harwood, John & Lusseau, David, 2014. "Activities, motivations and disturbance: An agent-based model of bottlenose dolphin behavioral dynamics and interactions with tourism in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 44-58.
    16. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Patterns of extra-territorial nest-box visits in a songbird suggest a role in extrapair mating," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 150-159.
    17. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Tomback, Diana F. & Lorenz, Teresa & Marceau, Danielle, 2017. "Energetic behavioural-strategy prioritization of Clark’s nutcrackers in whitebark pine communities: An agent-based modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 123-139.
    18. Guillem, E.E. & Murray-Rust, D. & Robinson, D.T. & Barnes, A. & Rounsevell, M.D.A., 2015. "Modelling farmer decision-making to anticipate tradeoffs between provisioning ecosystem services and biodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Nathan, Lucas R. & Mamoozadeh, Nadya & Tumas, Hayley R. & Gunselman, Samuel & Klass, Keren & Metcalfe, Anya & Edge, Chris & Waits, Lisette P. & Spruell, Paul & Lowery, Erin & Connor, Ed & Bearlin, And, 2019. "A spatially-explicit, individual-based demogenetic simulation framework for evaluating hybridization dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 40-51.
    20. Mitchell B. Stephenson & Derek W. Bailey, 2017. "Do Movement Patterns of GPS-Tracked Cattle on Extensive Rangelands Suggest Independence among Individuals?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.