IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i5p463-d1596709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Management and Evolution of Land Use and Land Cover in Romania During the Period 1990–2022 in the Context of Political and Environmental Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Jenica Călina

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

  • Aurel Călina

    (Department of Land Surveying, Management, Mechanization, University of Craiova, Libertății No. 19, 200421 Craiova, Romania)

  • Gheorghe Marian Vangu

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

  • Alin Constantin Croitoru

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

  • Marius Miluț

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

  • Nicolae Ion Băbucă

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

  • Ion Stan

    (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, A.I. Cuza No. 13, 200396 Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

Land use and land cover are the main anthropogenic factors that lead to the rapid and aggressive degradation of land and interfere with the functioning of ecosystems, especially through the expansion of urbanization and the reduction in forested areas. The purpose of this article is to identify sources of official data and to build an updated dataset upon which analysis algorithms can be applied. Basic analyses were performed on the dataset to study the evolution of land use and land cover in Romania during the period 1990–2022 and to analyze whether they align with and support national and European strategies for economic development. The study is based on the historical evolution of land use and land cover over the past 30 years, which has allowed us to identify current trends and to analyze potential future positive and negative effects, and facilitates the adoption of documented corrective measures. The methodology applied is based on the collection and analysis of historical data obtained mainly from the TEMPO database managed by the National Institute of Statistics and from the annual reports of the National Environmental Protection Agency, analyzing these data, identifying current trends, and issuing specific recommendations. Monitoring the dynamics of land use during the mentioned period allowed us to identify the most important developments with positive effects (a slight increase in forested areas and minimal variations in arable land) but mostly negative effects (a drastic reduction in areas occupied by vineyards and orchards, a decrease in areas occupied by water, and a concerning increase in unproductive land). The results highlight the importance of the immediate implementation of the national general cadastre system, as well as the importance of implementing appropriate policies, legislative provisions, and land management practices aimed at environmental protection and supporting sustainable development and biodiversity in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenica Călina & Aurel Călina & Gheorghe Marian Vangu & Alin Constantin Croitoru & Marius Miluț & Nicolae Ion Băbucă & Ion Stan, 2025. "A Study on the Management and Evolution of Land Use and Land Cover in Romania During the Period 1990–2022 in the Context of Political and Environmental Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-39, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:463-:d:1596709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Motuma Shiferaw Regasa & Michael Nones & Dereje Adeba, 2021. "A Review on Land Use and Land Cover Change in Ethiopian Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Jenica Călina & Aurel Călina & Tiberiu Iancu & Gheorghe Marian Vangu, 2022. "Research on the Use of Aerial Scanning and Gis in the Design of Sustainable Agricultural Production Extension Works in an Agritourist Farm in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Rolf Jens Brunstad & Ivar Gaasland & Erling Vardal, 2005. "Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(4), pages 469-488, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2022. "Improving the Resilience of Pastoral Cattle Production in Southern Ethiopia," World Bank Publications - Reports 38471, The World Bank Group.
    2. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    3. Huber, Robert & Lehmann, Bernard, 2010. "Economies of Scope in the Agricultural Provision of Ecosystem Services: An Application to a High Cost Production Region," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(02), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Maira Masood & Chunguang He & Shoukat Ali Shah & Syed Aziz Ur Rehman, 2024. "Land Use Change Impacts over the Indus Delta: A Case Study of Sindh Province, Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Zibibula Simayi & Ayinuer Mamat & Bumairiyemu Maimaiti & Yunfei Ma, 2023. "FLUS Based Modeling of the Urban LULC in Arid and Semi-Arid Region of Northwest China: A Case Study of Urumqi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2014. "GHG abatement welfare cost curves for Norwegian agriculture," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 169734, Agricultural Economics Society.
    7. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vardal, Erling, 2011. "Activity level, emission intensity, and optimal GHG abatement policy: An application to Norwegian agriculture," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108780, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Kopainsky, Birgit & Flury, Christian & Giuliani, Gianluca, 2008. "Agriculture’s contribution to rural viability: An approach to estimate regional economic impacts of agricultural policy in Swiss case study regions," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6483, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2013. "Trade-Off Between Food Production And Greenhouse Gas Mitigation In Norwegian Agriculture," Working Papers in Economics 01/13, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    10. Özkan Gülzari, Şeyda & Åby, Bente Aspeholen & Persson, Tomas & Höglind, Mats & Mittenzwei, Klaus, 2017. "Combining models to estimate the impacts of future climate scenarios on feed supply, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance on dairy farms in Norway," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 157-169.
    11. Thilo W. Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2008. "Assessing the production and welfare effects of agri-environmental policy: a conceptual analysis," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 75-92.
    12. Mark V. Brady & Jordan Hristov & Fredrik Wilhelmsson & Katarina Hedlund, 2019. "Roadmap for Valuing Soil Ecosystem Services to Inform Multi-Level Decision-Making in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Hongji Chen & Qingyuan Yang & Kangchuan Su & Haozhe Zhang & Dan Lu & Hui Xiang & Lulu Zhou, 2021. "Identification and Optimization of Production-Living-Ecological Space in an Ecological Foundation Area in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Ricart, Sandra & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2017. "Balancing irrigation multifunctionality based on key stakeholders’ attitudes: Lessons learned from the Muzza system, Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 461-473.
    15. Wang, Quan & Wang, Haijun & Chang, Ruihan & Zeng, Haoran & Bai, Xuepiao, 2022. "Dynamic simulation patterns and spatiotemporal analysis of land-use/land-cover changes in the Wuhan metropolitan area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    16. Mittenzwei, Klaus & Persson, Tomas & Höglind, Mats & Kværnø, Sigrun, 2017. "Combined effects of climate change and policy uncertainty on the agricultural sector in Norway," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 118-126.
    17. Marilena Labianca, 2023. "Proposal of a Method for Identifying Socio-Economic Spatial Concentrations for the Development of Rural Areas: An Application to the Apulia Region (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Markos Mathewos & Semaria Moga Lencha & Misgena Tsegaye, 2022. "Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessment and Future Predictions in the Matenchose Watershed, Rift Valley Basin, Using CA-Markov Simulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Blandford, David & Brunstad, Rolf Jens & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2008. "Optimal agricultural policy and PSE measurement: an assessment and application to Norway," Working Papers in Economics 12/08, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    20. Huber, Robert, 2008. "Economies of Scope in the Agricultural Provision of Ecosystems Services: A Swiss Case Study," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43969, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:463-:d:1596709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.