IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i2p181-d1567710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction and Optimization of Integrated Yield Prediction Model Based on Phenotypic Characteristics of Rice Grown in Small–Scale Plantations

Author

Listed:
  • Jihong Sun

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    The Key Laboratory for Crop Production and Smart Agriculture of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Peng Tian

    (The Key Laboratory for Crop Production and Smart Agriculture of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    College of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Zhaowen Li

    (The Key Laboratory for Crop Production and Smart Agriculture of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    College of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Xinrui Wang

    (The Key Laboratory for Crop Production and Smart Agriculture of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    College of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Haokai Zhang

    (Engineering College, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Jiangquan Chen

    (College of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Ye Qian

    (The Key Laboratory for Crop Production and Smart Agriculture of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    College of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

Abstract

An intelligent prediction model for rice yield in small-scale cultivation areas can provide precise forecasting results for farmers, rice planting enterprises, and researchers, holding significant importance for agricultural industries and crop science research within small regions. Although machine learning can handle complex nonlinear problems to enhance prediction accuracy, further improvements in models are still needed to accurately predict rice yields in small areas facing complex planting environments, thereby enhancing model performance. This study employs four rice phenotypic traits, namely, panicle angle, panicle length, total branch length, and grain number, along with seven machine learning methods—multiple linear regression, support vector machine, MLP, random forest, GBR, XGBoost, and LightGBM—to construct a yield prediction model group. Subsequently, the top three models with the best performance in individual model predictions are integrated using voting and stacking ensemble methods to obtain the optimal integrated model. Finally, the impact of different rice phenotypic traits on the performance of the stacked ensemble model is explored. Experimental results indicate that the random forest model performs best after individual machine learning modeling, with RMSE, R 2 , and MAPE values of 0.2777, 0.9062, and 17.04%, respectively. After model integration, Stacking–3m demonstrates the best performance, with RMSE, R 2 , and MAPE values of 0.2483, 0.9250, and 6.90%, respectively. Compared to the performance after random forest modeling, the RMSE decreased by 10.58%, R 2 increased by 1.88%, and MAPE decreased by 0.76%, indicating improved model performance after stacking ensemble. The Stacking–3m model, which demonstrated the best comprehensive evaluation metrics, was selected for model validation, and the validation results were satisfactory, with MAE, R 2 , and MAPE values of 8.3384, 0.9285, and 0.2689, respectively. The above research findings demonstrate that this integrated model possesses high practical value and fills a gap in precise yield prediction for small-scale rice cultivation in the Yunnan Plateau region.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihong Sun & Peng Tian & Zhaowen Li & Xinrui Wang & Haokai Zhang & Jiangquan Chen & Ye Qian, 2025. "Construction and Optimization of Integrated Yield Prediction Model Based on Phenotypic Characteristics of Rice Grown in Small–Scale Plantations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:181-:d:1567710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    2. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "Rejoinder on: A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 264-268, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Ma, Zhikai & Huo, Qian & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Voltage-temperature aware thermal runaway alarming framework for electric vehicles via deep learning with attention mechanism in time-frequency domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    4. Jie Shi & Arno P. J. M. Siebes & Siamak Mehrkanoon, 2023. "TransCORALNet: A Two-Stream Transformer CORAL Networks for Supply Chain Credit Assessment Cold Start," Papers 2311.18749, arXiv.org.
    5. Bourdouxhe, Axel & Wibail, Lionel & Claessens, Hugues & Dufrêne, Marc, 2023. "Modeling potential natural vegetation: A new light on an old concept to guide nature conservation in fragmented and degraded landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    6. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    7. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    8. Yiyi Huo & Yingying Fan & Fang Han, 2023. "On the adaptation of causal forests to manifold data," Papers 2311.16486, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    9. Akshita Bassi & Aditya Manchanda & Rajwinder Singh & Mahesh Patel, 2023. "A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash-based concrete," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 209-238, August.
    10. Sachin Kumar & Zairu Nisha & Jagvinder Singh & Anuj Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Sensor network driven novel hybrid model based on feature selection and SVR to predict indoor temperature for energy consumption optimisation in smart buildings," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 3048-3061, December.
    11. Yong-Chao Su & Cheng-Yu Wu & Cheng-Hong Yang & Bo-Sheng Li & Sin-Hua Moi & Yu-Da Lin, 2021. "Machine Learning Data Imputation and Prediction of Foraging Group Size in a Kleptoparasitic Spider," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Diogenis A. Kiziridis & Anna Mastrogianni & Magdalini Pleniou & Elpida Karadimou & Spyros Tsiftsis & Fotios Xystrakis & Ioannis Tsiripidis, 2022. "Acceleration and Relocation of Abandonment in a Mediterranean Mountainous Landscape: Drivers, Consequences, and Management Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Escribano, Álvaro & Wang, Dandan, 2021. "Mixed random forest, cointegration, and forecasting gasoline prices," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1442-1462.
    14. Hunish Bansal & Basavraj Chinagundi & Prashant Singh Rana & Neeraj Kumar, 2022. "An Ensemble Machine Learning Technique for Detection of Abnormalities in Knee Movement Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    16. Siyoon Kwon & Hyoseob Noh & Il Won Seo & Sung Hyun Jung & Donghae Baek, 2021. "Identification Framework of Contaminant Spill in Rivers Using Machine Learning with Breakthrough Curve Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Sylwester Bejger, 2024. "Machine Learning in Cartel Screening—The Case of Parallel Pricing in a Fuel Wholesale Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Lotfi Boudabsa & Damir Filipovi'c, 2022. "Ensemble learning for portfolio valuation and risk management," Papers 2204.05926, arXiv.org.
    19. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Daniel Boller & Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2021. "The Effect of Sport in Online Dating: Evidence from Causal Machine Learning," Papers 2104.04601, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:181-:d:1567710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.