IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1372-d1457290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Improved GWO Algorithm for Solving Optimal Paths in Complex Vertical Farms with Multi-Robot Multi-Tasking

Author

Listed:
  • Jiazheng Shen

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Tang Sai Hong

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Luxin Fan

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Ruixin Zhao

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Khairol Anuar b. Mohd Ariffin

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Azizan bin As’arry

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

As the global population grows, achieving Zero Hunger by 2030 presents a significant challenge. Vertical farming technology offers a potential solution, making the path planning of agricultural robots in vertical farms a research priority. This study introduces the Vertical Farming System Multi-Robot Trajectory Planning (VFSMRTP) model. To optimize this model, we propose the Elitist Preservation Differential Evolution Grey Wolf Optimizer (EPDE-GWO), an enhanced version of the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) incorporating elite preservation and differential evolution. The EPDE-GWO algorithm is compared with Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The experimental results demonstrate that EPDE-GWO reduces path length by 24.6%, prevents premature convergence, and exhibits strong global search capabilities. Thanks to the DE and EP strategies, the EPDE-GWO requires fewer iterations to reach the optimal solution, offers strong stability and robustness, and consistently finds the optimal solution at a high frequency. These attributes are particularly significant in the context of vertical farming, where optimizing robotic path planning is essential for maximizing operational efficiency, reducing energy consumption, and improving the scalability of farming operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiazheng Shen & Tang Sai Hong & Luxin Fan & Ruixin Zhao & Mohd Khairol Anuar b. Mohd Ariffin & Azizan bin As’arry, 2024. "Development of an Improved GWO Algorithm for Solving Optimal Paths in Complex Vertical Farms with Multi-Robot Multi-Tasking," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1372-:d:1457290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Emmi & Roemi Fernández & Pablo Gonzalez-de-Santos & Matteo Francia & Matteo Golfarelli & Giuliano Vitali & Hendrik Sandmann & Michael Hustedt & Merve Wollweber, 2023. "Exploiting the Internet Resources for Autonomous Robots in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Jeffrey K. O'Hara & Jeffrey Lin, 2020. "Population Density and Local Food Market Channels," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 477-496, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey K. O'Hara & Nony Dutton & Nick Stavely, 2022. "The influence of farmers markets' characteristics on vendor sales," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 295-311, April.
    2. Jin Yuan & Wei Ji & Qingchun Feng, 2023. "Robots and Autonomous Machines for Sustainable Agriculture Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, July.
    3. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Joachim Bronder & Wanda Jarosz & Janusz Krupanek, 2024. "Potential of Eco-Weeding with High-Power Laser Adoption from the Farmers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Jeffrey K. O'Hara & Marcelo Castillo & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2021. "Do Cottage Food Laws Reduce Barriers to Entry for Food Manufacturers?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 935-951, September.
    5. Becca B. R. Jablonski & Martha Sullins & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2019. "Community-Supported Agriculture Marketing Performance: Results from Pilot Market Channel Assessments in Colorado," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Kumar, Sushant & Murphy, Mikko & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "What drives brand love and purchase intentions toward the local food distribution system? A study of social media-based REKO (fair consumption) groups," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Fernianda Rahayu Hermiatin & Yuanita Handayati & Tomy Perdana & Dadan Wardhana, 2022. "Creating Food Value Chain Transformations through Regional Food Hubs: A Review Article," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Timothy Park & Steve Martinez & Mohammed Ibrahim, 2024. "Sales performance of direct food marketers: African American‐led operations," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 255-274, March.
    9. Matthew M. Mars, 2022. "Community and Cultural Entrepreneurship and Value Co-Creation in the Local Food Marketscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Ruth Cordova-Cardenas & Luis Emmi & Pablo Gonzalez-de-Santos, 2023. "Enabling Autonomous Navigation on the Farm: A Mission Planner for Agricultural Tasks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Elena G. Popkova & Shakhlo T. Ergasheva & Nadezhda K. Savelyeva & Marija A. Troyanskaya, 2024. "Change Management for the Sustainable Development of the Agrarian Economy of Artificial Intelligence," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 79-90, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1372-:d:1457290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.