IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1219-d1442117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing a Sustainable Future in Rural Romania: Agrotourism and Vernacular Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Raul-Cătălin Oltean

    (Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Carl T. Dahlman

    (Department of Geography and Walker Institute of International and Area Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Felix-Horatiu Arion

    (Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

In Romania, rural communities grapple with decades of depopulation and economic decline, endangering the natural and cultural richness of their landscapes. The implementation of Romania’s 2030 sustainable development plan presents an opportunity to reverse these trends by merging economic and community development with cultural preservation. This paper examines the potential for creating new livelihood opportunities through a program that integrates sustainable agrotourism with culturally appropriate vernacular architecture in Romania’s distinct rural regions. Focusing on two such regions characterized by significant rural population decline yet endowed with ecological services capable of supporting a diverse rural economy, we collaborated with an architect and landscape engineer to devise three specific and detailed agritourist housing scenarios. These scenarios draw upon local architectural forms harmonious with the vernacular landscape, providing accommodations for agrotourism guests and facilitating craft workshops for visitors interested in rural crafts and traditions. We evaluated the cultural appropriateness of the architectural designs through a social survey and assessed the broader social utility of the development plan via an expansive cost–benefit analysis, treating the project’s sustainability features as quasi-public goods. Such interdisciplinary endeavours are essential for effectively bridging conceptually driven social analysis with pragmatic design and planning strategies, essential for achieving sustainable futures for rural communities and landscapes, as exemplified by rural Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Raul-Cătălin Oltean & Carl T. Dahlman & Felix-Horatiu Arion, 2024. "Visualizing a Sustainable Future in Rural Romania: Agrotourism and Vernacular Architecture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1219-:d:1442117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liliana GURAN-NICA & Marioara RUSU, 2015. "The Changing Demographic Profile Of Romanian Rural Areas," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 61-70.
    2. Guran-Nica, Liliana & Rusu, Marioara, 2015. "The changing demographic profile of Romanian rural areas," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 12.
    3. Ionel Muntele & Marinela Istrate & Haralambie Athes & Alexandru Bănică, 2023. "An Overview of Population Dynamics in Romanian Carpathians (1912–2021): Factors, Spatial Patterns and Urban–Rural Disparities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Oakland, William H., 1987. "Theory of public goods," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 9, pages 485-535, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionel Muntele & Marinela Istrate & Haralambie Athes & Alexandru Bănică, 2023. "An Overview of Population Dynamics in Romanian Carpathians (1912–2021): Factors, Spatial Patterns and Urban–Rural Disparities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Paula E. Stephan, 2004. "Robert K. Merton's perspective on priority and the provision of the public good knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(1), pages 81-87, May.
    3. Nordhaus, William, 2013. "Integrated Economic and Climate Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1069-1131, Elsevier.
    4. Johan Fourie, 2006. "Some policy proposals for future infrastructure investment in South Africa," Working Papers 05/2006, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    5. Takuya Obara & Shuichi Tsugawa & Shunsuke Managi, 2021. "$$\lambda $$ λ envy-free pricing for impure public good," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 9(1), pages 11-25, April.
    6. Hassan Benchekroun & Charles Figuières & Mabel Tidball, 2016. "Implementation of the Lindahl Correspondance via Simple Indirect Mechanisms," AMSE Working Papers 1637, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    7. George Economides & Apostolis Philippopoulos, 2003. "Are Nash Tax Rates too Low or Too High? The Role of Endogenous Growth in Models with Public Goods," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 6(1), pages 37-53, January.
    8. Louis Kaplow, 1993. "Should the Government's Allocation Branch be Concerned about the Distortionary Cost of Taxation and Distributive Effects?," NBER Working Papers 4566, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Mark I. Lichbach, 1994. "Rethinking Rationality and Rebellion," Rationality and Society, , vol. 6(1), pages 8-39, January.
    10. Apostolis Philippopoulos & George Economides, 2000. "Are Nash Tax Rates too Low or too High? An Example of the Role of Economic Growth in Models with Public Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 349, CESifo.
    11. Richter, Wolfram F. & Schneider, Kerstin, 1999. "Competition for stars and audiences: an analysis of alternative institutional settings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 101-121, March.
    12. Cong Gu & Benfu Lv & Geng Peng, 2022. "Google and Alibaba s Different Stock Performances after Antitrust Investigations, the Reasons and Enlightenment," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 26-36, March.
    13. Bernd Huber & Marco Runkel, 2009. "Tax competition, excludable public goods, and user charges," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 16(3), pages 321-336, June.
    14. Hongpeng Fu & Lingbo Fu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu, 2024. "Bridging Gaps towards the 2030 Agenda: A Data-Driven Comparative Analysis of Government and Public Engagement in China towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    15. C. Lindsay & William Dougan, 2013. "Efficiency in the provision of pure public goods by private citizens," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 31-43, July.
    16. Page, Scott E., 1997. "An appending efficient algorithm for allocating public projects with positive complementarities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 291-321, June.
    17. George Economides & Apostolis Philippopoulos, 2000. "Pollution and Resource Extraction: Do they Matter for the Dynamics of Growth?," CESifo Working Paper Series 361, CESifo.
    18. Concepción Rey Mejías & Helena Lenihan & Bernadette O’Regan, 2010. "Charges in the Industrial Water Sector: Comparison Between Ireland and Spain," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(1), pages 113-132, January.
    19. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2000. "Market Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Broadcasting," NBER Working Papers 7513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "International policy entrepreneurship and production of international public goods: the case of multilateral trade regime," MPRA Paper 80819, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1219-:d:1442117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.