IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p1099-d1431386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Twin System of Pest Management Driven by Data and Model Fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Min Dai

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Yutian Shen

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Xiaoyin Li

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Jingjing Liu

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Shanwen Zhang

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Hong Miao

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

Abstract

Protecting crops from pests is a major issue in the current agricultural production system. The agricultural digital twin system, as an emerging product of modern agricultural development, can effectively achieve intelligent control of pest management systems. In response to the current problems of heavy use of pesticides in pest management and over-reliance on managers’ personal experience with pepper plants, this paper proposes a digital twin system that monitors changes in aphid populations, enabling timely and effective pest control interventions. The digital twin system is developed for pest management driven by data and model fusion. First, a digital twin framework is presented to manage insect pests in the whole process of crop growth. Then, a digital twin model is established to predict the number of pests based on the random forest algorithm optimized by the genetic algorithm; a pest control intervention based on a twin data search strategy is designed and the decision optimization of pest management is conducted. Finally, a case study is carried out to verify the feasibility of the system for the growth state of pepper and pepper pests. The experimental results show that the virtual and real interactive feedback of the pepper aphid management system is achieved. It can obtain prediction accuracy of 88.01% with the training set and prediction accuracy of 85.73% with the test set. The application of the prediction model to the decision-making objective function can improve economic efficiency by more than 20%. In addition, the proposed approach is superior to the manual regulatory method in pest management. This system prioritizes detecting population trends over precise species identification, providing a practical tool for integrated pest management (IPM).

Suggested Citation

  • Min Dai & Yutian Shen & Xiaoyin Li & Jingjing Liu & Shanwen Zhang & Hong Miao, 2024. "Digital Twin System of Pest Management Driven by Data and Model Fusion," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1099-:d:1431386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy C. Durham & Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Comparative Economics of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Agricultural Production Systems," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bang, Rasmus & Hansen, Bjørn Gunnar & Guajardo, Mario & Sommerseth, Jon Kristian & Flaten, Ola & Asheim, Leif Jarle, 2024. "Conventional or organic cattle farming? Trade-offs between crop yield, livestock capacity, organic premiums, and government payments," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    2. Florian Ahrens & Johann Land & Susan Krumdieck, 2022. "Decarbonization of Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Transition Engineering Desk Study for Agriculture in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Christian Nansen, 2024. "Active Learning, Living Laboratories, Student Empowerment, and Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Jiaqi Zhang & Hui Yong & Ning Lv, 2024. "Balancing Productivity and Sustainability: Insights into Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Arid Region of Northwest China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13828-13856, September.
    5. Leonardo Cei & Gianluca Stefani & Luca Rossetto, 2024. "Twenty Years of Socio-Economic Research on Organic Agriculture Across the World: Looking at the Past to Be Ready for the Future," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Eliana Martinez & Carlos Alberto Marcillo-Paguay & Eliana Gisela Revelo-Gomez & Mónica Cuervo & Erika Paola Igua-Urbano, 2024. "Effect of Flowering Strips in Associated Broccoli and Lettuce Crops on Increasing Land Use Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Milica Fotirić Akšić & Dragana Dabić Zagorac & Uroš Gašić & Tomislav Tosti & Maja Natić & Mekjell Meland, 2022. "Analysis of Apple Fruit ( Malus × domestica Borkh.) Quality Attributes Obtained from Organic and Integrated Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Gábor Gyarmati, 2024. "Transformation of the Three Pillars of Agri-Food Sustainability around the COVID-19 Crisis—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Ruggiero Sardaro & Daniela Panio & Paweł Chmieliński & Piermichele La Sala, 2024. "Efficiency of the Integrated Production Systems: Evidence from the Winegrowing Firms in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Tomáš Chovanec & Festus Onyebuchi Eze & Atif Muhammad & Jan Moudrý & Petr Bartoš & Chisenga Emmanuel Mukosha & Okechukwu George Eke, 2024. "Sustainability and Social Farming in the Czech Republic: The Impact of Selected Factors on the Employment of Disadvantaged Persons in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2021. "Farmer Decision-Making on the Concept of Coexistence: A Comparative Analysis between Organic and Biotech Farmers in the Philippines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Sofia Plakantonaki & Kyriaki Kiskira & Nikolaos Zacharopoulos & Ioannis Chronis & Fernando Coelho & Amir Togiani & Konstantinos Kalkanis & Georgios Priniotakis, 2023. "A Review of Sustainability Standards and Ecolabeling in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Monica Laura Zlati & Costinela Fortea & Valentin Marian Antohi, 2024. "The Economic Value of European Organic Farming in the Transition to Climate Neutrality," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 1, pages 63-75.
    14. Asfawi, S & Utomo, D & Isworo, S, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis Of Organic And Conventional Horticultural Farming In The Getasan District, Semarang Indonesia," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(8), August.
    15. Francisco Javier Peña Rodríguez & Alberto Matarán Ruiz & Adolfo José Torres Rodríguez & César Eduardo de la Cruz Abarca & Josefa Sánchez Contreras & Alba Ruiz Díez & Sergio Visquert Bruguera & Juan Ca, 2024. "Long-Time Assessment of the Organic Farmer’s Market in Granada (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Sánchez, Andrea C. & Kamau, Hannah N. & Grazioli, Francesca & Jones, Sarah K., 2022. "Financial profitability of diversified farming systems: A global meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    17. Christian Bux & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Erica Varese & Vera Amicarelli, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Assessment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1099-:d:1431386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.