IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i5p754-d1393235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Live Bulb Weight for Field Vegetables Using Functional Regression Models and Machine Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Dahyun Kim

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea)

  • Wanhyun Cho

    (Department of Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea)

  • Inseop Na

    (Division of Culture Contents, Chonnam National University, Yeosu 59626, Republic of Korea)

  • Myung Hwan Na

    (Department of Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

(1) Background: This challenge is exacerbated by the aging of the rural population, leading to a scarcity of available manpower. To address this issue, the automation and mechanization of outdoor vegetable cultivation are imperative. Therefore, developing an automated cultivation platform that reduces labor requirements and improves yield by efficiently performing all the cultivation activities related to field vegetables, particularly onions and garlic, is essential. In this study, we propose methods to identify onion and garlic plants with the best growth status and accurately predict their live bulb weight by regularly photographing their growth status using a multispectral camera mounted on a drone. (2) Methods: This study was conducted in four stages. First, two pilot blocks with a total of 16 experimental units, four horizontals, and four verticals were installed for both onions and garlic. Overall, a total of 32 experimental units were prepared for both onion and garlic. Second, multispectral image data were collected using a multispectral camera repeating a total of seven times for each area in 32 experimental units prepared for both onions and garlic. Simultaneously, growth data and live bulb weight at the corresponding points were recorded manually. Third, correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between various vegetation indexes extracted from multispectral images and the manually measured growth data and live bulb weights. Fourth, based on the vegetation indexes extracted from multispectral images and previously collected growth data, a method to predict the live bulb weight of onions and garlic in real time during the cultivation period, using functional regression models and machine learning methods, was examined. (3) Results: The experimental results revealed that the Functional Concurrence Regression (FCR) model exhibited the most robust prediction performance both when using growth factors and when using vegetation indexes. Following closely, with a slight distinction, Gaussian Process Functional Data Analysis (GPFDA), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and AdaBoost demonstrated the next-best predictive power. However, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) displayed comparatively poorer predictive power. Notably, when employing growth factors as explanatory variables, all prediction models exhibited a slightly improved performance compared to that when using vegetation indexes. (4) Discussion: This study explores predicting onion and garlic bulb weights in real-time using multispectral imaging and machine learning, filling a gap in research where previous studies primarily focused on utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning for productivity enhancement, disease management, and crop monitoring. (5) Conclusions: In this study, we developed an automated method to predict the growth trajectory of onion and garlic bulb weights throughout the growing season by utilizing multispectral images, growth factors, and live bulb weight data, revealing that the FCR model demonstrated the most robust predictive performance among six artificial intelligence models tested.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahyun Kim & Wanhyun Cho & Inseop Na & Myung Hwan Na, 2024. "Prediction of Live Bulb Weight for Field Vegetables Using Functional Regression Models and Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:754-:d:1393235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo P. Masini & Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2023. "Machine learning advances for time series forecasting," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 76-111, February.
    2. repec:hal:journl:hal-04675599 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Philippe Goulet Coulombe, 2020. "The Macroeconomy as a Random Forest," Papers 2006.12724, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    4. Goller, Daniel & Harrer, Tamara & Lechner, Michael & Wolff, Joachim, 2021. "Active labour market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learning," Economics Working Paper Series 2108, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    5. Eleni Kalamara & Arthur Turrell & Chris Redl & George Kapetanios & Sujit Kapadia, 2022. "Making text count: Economic forecasting using newspaper text," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 896-919, August.
    6. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 505-519, March.
    7. Goulet Coulombe, Philippe & Leroux, Maxime & Stevanovic, Dalibor & Surprenant, Stéphane, 2021. "Macroeconomic data transformations matter," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1338-1354.
    8. Philippe Goulet Coulombe, 2021. "The Macroeconomy as a Random Forest," Working Papers 21-05, Chair in macroeconomics and forecasting, University of Quebec in Montreal's School of Management.
    9. Daniel Goller & Sandro Heiniger, 2024. "A general framework to quantify the event importance in multi-event contests," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 71-93, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:754-:d:1393235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.