IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1789-d1497127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Camellia oleifera Tree Detection and Counting Based on UAV RGB Image and YOLOv8

Author

Listed:
  • Renxu Yang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Debao Yuan

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    Inner Mongolia Research Institute of China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Ordos 010300, China)

  • Maochen Zhao

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhao Zhao

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Liuya Zhang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuqing Fan

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guangyu Liang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yifei Zhou

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The detection and counting of Camellia oleifera trees are important parts of the yield estimation of Camellia oleifera . The ability to identify and count Camellia oleifera trees quickly has always been important in the context of research on the yield estimation of Camellia oleifera . Because of their specific growing environment, it is a difficult task to identify and count Camellia oleifera trees with high efficiency. In this paper, based on a UAV RGB image, three different types of datasets, i.e., a DOM dataset, an original image dataset, and a cropped original image dataset, were designed. Combined with the YOLOv8 model, the detection and counting of Camellia oleifera trees were carried out. By comparing YOLOv9 and YOLOv10 in four evaluation indexes, including precision, recall, mAP, and F1 score, Camellia oleifera trees in two areas were selected for prediction and compared with the real values. The experimental results show that the cropped original image dataset was better for the recognition and counting of Camellia oleifera , and the mAP values were 8% and 11% higher than those of the DOM dataset and the original image dataset, respectively. Compared to YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv9, and YOLOv10, YOLOv8 performed better in terms of the accuracy and recall rate, and the mAP improved by 3–8%, reaching 0.82. Regression analysis was performed on the predicted and measured values, and the average R 2 reached 0.94. This research shows that a UAV RGB image combined with YOLOv8 provides an effective solution for the detection and counting of Camellia oleifera trees, which is of great significance for Camellia oleifera yield estimation and orchard management.

Suggested Citation

  • Renxu Yang & Debao Yuan & Maochen Zhao & Zhao Zhao & Liuya Zhang & Yuqing Fan & Guangyu Liang & Yifei Zhou, 2024. "Camellia oleifera Tree Detection and Counting Based on UAV RGB Image and YOLOv8," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1789-:d:1497127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tran, Huy T. & Balchanos, Michael & Domerçant, Jean Charles & Mavris, Dimitri N., 2017. "A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 73-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Wang, Yuzhi & Zhang, Yingchao, 2022. "Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Maddah, Negin & Heydari, Babak, 2024. "Building back better: Modeling decentralized recovery in sociotechnical systems using strategic network dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    3. Matteo De Marchi & Fanny Friedrich & Michael Riedl & Hartmut Zadek & Erwin Rauch, 2023. "Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Watson, Bryan C & Morris, Zack B & Weissburg, Marc & Bras, Bert, 2023. "System of system design-for-resilience heuristics derived from forestry case study variants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Zhou, Xinxin & Huang, Yun & Bai, Guanghan & Xu, Bei & Tao, Junyong, 2024. "The resilience evaluation of unmanned autonomous swarm with informed agents under partial failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Bhuyan, Kasturi & Sharma, Hrishikesh, 2022. "Reliability analysis & performance-based code calibration for slabs/walls of protective structures subject to air blast loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Zhong, Yuanfu & Li, Hongxu & Sun, Qin & Huang, Zhiwen & Zhang, Yingchao, 2024. "A kill chain optimization method for improving the resilience of unmanned combat system-of-systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Bhuyan, Kasturi & Sharma, Hrishikesh, 2024. "Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimate for NRC and UHSC panels subjected to contact blast," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Pan, Xing & Dang, Yuheng & Wang, Huixiong & Hong, Dongpao & Li, Yuehong & Deng, Hongxu, 2022. "Resilience model and recovery strategy of transportation network based on travel OD-grid analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Ruiying Li & Xiaoyu Tian & Li Yu & Rui Kang, 2019. "A Systematic Disturbance Analysis Method for Resilience Evaluation: A Case Study in Material Handling Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Yodo, Nita & Wang, Pingfeng, 2018. "A control-guided failure restoration framework for the design of resilient engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 179-190.
    12. Shuai Lin & Limin Jia & Hengrun Zhang & Yanhui Wang, 2021. "A method for assessing resilience of high-speed EMUs considering a network-based system topology and performance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 877-895, October.
    13. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng, 2022. "A demand-based framework for resilience assessment of multistate networks under disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Yang, Bofan & Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Bo & Wang, Wenfeng & Zhang, Minglinag, 2021. "Resilience Metric of Equipment System: Theory, Measurement and Sensitivity Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Wróbel, Krzysztof & Montewka, Jakub & Kujala, Pentti, 2017. "Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 155-169.
    16. Cheng, Yao & Elsayed, E.A. & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    17. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    19. Smruti Manjunath & Madhura Yeligeti & Maria Fyta & Jannik Haas & Hans-Christian Gils, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 on Electricity Demand: Deriving Minimum States of System Health for Studies on Resilience," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-20, July.
    20. David Ricardo Pedroza-Martínez & Julio Eduardo Beltrán-Vargas & Carlos Alfonso Zafra-Mejía, 2024. "Socioecological Resilience: Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of an Invasive Species Assemblage on a Lake Ecosystem," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1789-:d:1497127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.